- Banned
- #281
Yeah, here's the thing about Bush...
Aside from people being upset over the whole losing the election thing, which really wasn't Bush's fault exactly, just a bad set of circumstances, people weren't all that hard on Bush, aside from a few criticisms here and there, until he really started to fuck things up.
Which was a good 2-3 years into his first term.
In fact, Bush had near universal support and approval immediately following 9/11.
You see, there was a REASON why people hated on W. He fucked up, big time, and people turned on him for it.
In Obama's case, however, you all have been screaming about how he's a "Socialist, Nazi, Fascist" since Day 1.
Hell, he still really hasn't done anything wrong yet. The situation our economy is in still hasn't receovered from the Bush years. The two wars we're in were started by Bush.
But if people were to listen to your insane rhetoric, he's pretty much the Anti-Christ.
You pick on the tiniest minutae of everything the man does and make a big deal out of it, whining and criticizing to no end about it.
That's why South Park, SNL, and all the other comedy outlets are making fun of you now. You're acting like a bunch of certifiable psychotics.
Your a fuckin ditz....they were after him from the time that he was elected....remember the "stolen election"? Get a reality check.
The only problem I have with obama is his policies, period.I didn't have a problem with him bowing, I'm not a birther.
I do have a problem with the msm, and their journalism abilities, and I have problems with the partisan hacks like yourself, Vast......but with Obama it's just his policies.
So take your drivel, and pander it elsewhere, OK?
Yes, I do in fact remember the "Stolen Election" thing, as I mentioned in the the post that you were responding to (see the first bolded paragraph).
Which of course, was not a criticism of Bush directly, but a criticism of the election process and the way it was handled.
Bush really didn't have much to do with that, now did he? So how would that be a criticism of Bush? Hmmm?
And you call ME a "partisan hack", but you're the one who seems to be trying to paint every media outlet on the planet that doesn't agree with you as some sort of (ahem) Vast Left-Wing conspiracy, which you and your right-wing partisan hack buddies have nick-named the "MSM". (The "MSM" of course being all media but Murdoch's media and Talk Radio)
Now, you say you're not a "Birther", yet you claim Obama has not presented the proper birth credentials (which he did) and that George Bush did (though he presented the same stuff Obama did).
You claim you have a problem with Obama's "policies" without elaborating on what specific policies those might be.
Forgive me for doubting your "non-partisan" nature, but it would seem there's good reason for me to do so.