Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 36,365
- 23,978
LOLOLLOLLOLLeschenko announced this in a Facebook post -
I laugh!
We're laughing at you too...
Court cancels earlier ruling that Ukrainian officials interfered in US election | KyivPost - Ukraine's Global Voice
The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeals has canceled a court ruling that found that independent lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, unlawfully interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
The appeals court made its ruling on July 16 and published the document the next day.
I laugh -
From your own link -
The verdicts were set aside, not because they were innocent, but -
" Rozenblat had no right to file the lawsuit because his interests had not been affected and because, according to the Supreme Court, administrative courts cannot consider lawsuits against Verkhovna Rada lawmakers. Leshchenko added that the statute of limitations for the lawsuit had expired."
You said they were guilty of interfering in the election on behalf of Hillary. Ukraine's courts say they aren't. I believe them over a fruit loop dingus like you.
Take a remedial reading class
Pass that class
Get back to me with evidence that you passed.
Dumbfuck: The country of Ukraine prosecuted officials in Ukraine for interfering in our election on behalf of Hillary. They were found guilty under Ukrainian law.
kyivpost: The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeals has canceled a court ruling that found that independent lawmaker Sergii Leshchenko and Artem Sytnyk, head of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, unlawfully interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
So no, they were not found guilty under Ukrainian law.![]()
Remedial reading 101
C'mon you can do it.