skookerasbil
Platinum Member
I think it will wrap up in mid 2019Some say he will play this out past November 2020. Now how hysterical would that be?
Leave time for impeachment by Nov 2020
Whatever you say s0n!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it will wrap up in mid 2019Some say he will play this out past November 2020. Now how hysterical would that be?
Leave time for impeachment by Nov 2020
Well if it's on Hannity's radio show then it must be true.
At this point they are just chickens with the heads cut off. Overwhelming evidence with multiple convictions and indictments, to go along with immunity deals from Trump associates. Their denials are insane at this point.You keep saying that...Let us know when you're done jerking yourself off to yet another of Mueller's nothing burger guilty pleas.In spite of Trumps dismissiveness over Manaforts role, Manafort was heavily involved in the Trump campaign. He was involved in key meetings, had private conversations, knows what Trump knows and what he saidWowYou really are a stupid person..... if anything, Mueller let manafort out of the last trial because he wants this over because there is nothing here and he is already looking like an idiot.....
Talk about dream world
Then why is Manafort cooperating?
This is why...
Paul Manafort's Guilty Plea: Second Trial Held No Benefit | National Review
Naturally, the media are spun up because the plea agreement, which will cap the 69-year-old Manafort’s prison time at ten years, requires Manafort’s cooperation. Anti-Trumpers have visions of the walls closing in on the president. I would counter with what I said after the Virginia convictions:
At this point, it does not appear that Mueller has a collusion case against Trump associates. His indictments involving Russian hacking and troll farms do not suggest complicity by the Trump campaign.
I also find it hard to believe Mueller sees Manafort as the key to making a case on Trump when Mueller has had [Richard] Gates — Manafort’s partner — as a cooperator for six months. You have to figure Gates knows whatever Manafort knows about collusion. Yet, since Gates began cooperating with the special counsel, Mueller has filed the charges against Russians that do not implicate Trump, and has transferred those cases to other Justice Department components.
I elaborated that, when it comes to Manafort, Mueller’s focus is not President Trump. It is Russia, “specifically, Manafort’s longtime connections to Kremlin-connected operatives.” This seems consistent with what Manafort’s camp is telling the press. Politico quotes a source close to Trump’s former campaign chairman: “The cooperation agreement does not involve the Trump campaign. . . .There was no collusion with Russia.”
The guilty plea serves Mueller’s purposes. He already had Manafort looking at a potential 80 years of prison exposure from the first case. He did not need another trial and additional jail time to ratchet up pressure. So prosecutors dropped the money-laundering charges as well as allegations that Manafort made false statements and failed to register as a foreign agent of a Kremlin-connected Ukranian party; but Mueller still got Manafort to admit to the underlying conduct in those charges by having the defendant plead guilty to the special counsel’s favorite device, the amorphous, elastic charge of “conspiracy against the United States.” In addition, Manafort pled guilty to obstructing justice — the witness-tampering allegation based on which he has been detained without bail.
Manafort is facing serious jail time and money laundering is nothing to sneeze at.
Collusion with Russia is not the end of this investigation. Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, tax evasion, malfeasance are all on the table
Manafort is quietly building a case
By his constant tweeting, Trump is obviously worried
Nothing Burger means there is nothing there
Mueller is getting convictions of top Trump aids
More importantly, he is getting their testimony on the inside of Trumps presidency
Whistling past a graveyardAt this point they are just chickens with the heads cut off. Overwhelming evidence with multiple convictions and indictments, to go along with immunity deals from Trump associates. Their denials are insane at this point.You keep saying that...Let us know when you're done jerking yourself off to yet another of Mueller's nothing burger guilty pleas.In spite of Trumps dismissiveness over Manaforts role, Manafort was heavily involved in the Trump campaign. He was involved in key meetings, had private conversations, knows what Trump knows and what he saidWow
Talk about dream world
Then why is Manafort cooperating?
This is why...
Paul Manafort's Guilty Plea: Second Trial Held No Benefit | National Review
Naturally, the media are spun up because the plea agreement, which will cap the 69-year-old Manafort’s prison time at ten years, requires Manafort’s cooperation. Anti-Trumpers have visions of the walls closing in on the president. I would counter with what I said after the Virginia convictions:
At this point, it does not appear that Mueller has a collusion case against Trump associates. His indictments involving Russian hacking and troll farms do not suggest complicity by the Trump campaign.
I also find it hard to believe Mueller sees Manafort as the key to making a case on Trump when Mueller has had [Richard] Gates — Manafort’s partner — as a cooperator for six months. You have to figure Gates knows whatever Manafort knows about collusion. Yet, since Gates began cooperating with the special counsel, Mueller has filed the charges against Russians that do not implicate Trump, and has transferred those cases to other Justice Department components.
I elaborated that, when it comes to Manafort, Mueller’s focus is not President Trump. It is Russia, “specifically, Manafort’s longtime connections to Kremlin-connected operatives.” This seems consistent with what Manafort’s camp is telling the press. Politico quotes a source close to Trump’s former campaign chairman: “The cooperation agreement does not involve the Trump campaign. . . .There was no collusion with Russia.”
The guilty plea serves Mueller’s purposes. He already had Manafort looking at a potential 80 years of prison exposure from the first case. He did not need another trial and additional jail time to ratchet up pressure. So prosecutors dropped the money-laundering charges as well as allegations that Manafort made false statements and failed to register as a foreign agent of a Kremlin-connected Ukranian party; but Mueller still got Manafort to admit to the underlying conduct in those charges by having the defendant plead guilty to the special counsel’s favorite device, the amorphous, elastic charge of “conspiracy against the United States.” In addition, Manafort pled guilty to obstructing justice — the witness-tampering allegation based on which he has been detained without bail.
Manafort is facing serious jail time and money laundering is nothing to sneeze at.
Collusion with Russia is not the end of this investigation. Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, tax evasion, malfeasance are all on the table
Manafort is quietly building a case
By his constant tweeting, Trump is obviously worried
Nothing Burger means there is nothing there
Mueller is getting convictions of top Trump aids
More importantly, he is getting their testimony on the inside of Trumps presidency
Once again, no, a president cannot be criminally prosecuted, or indicted while in office. In other words, partisan Libtards cannot prevent a president from doing his job.No dumbass, it's the constitution, which says that a president needs to do his job, and not have to respond to partisan generated fake investigations and "reports" with the purpose of derailing or indicting a presidency.From what I understand one of Trump's lawyers was going to file a claim based on past precedent that Mueller can't even submit a report. Which makes this whole Russia collusion hoax "much ado about nothing", which should actually be the Democrat party's motto. ,
Now why would Trump do that? Trump claims he has done nothing wrong?
And do you think that if this truly happened, it would be good? I would have to assume, that you are a Trump over country? That would be definitely Anti-American.
This country is a country with laws and no one is above the law.
Where in the Constitution does it say "the president needs to do his job"? Why is there this?
The Constitution, Article II, Section 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
I'll wait patiently for you to point out, that the Constitution says "the president needs to do his job" and impeachment is unconstitutional.
And you still got nothing that points to collusion, which, isnt' even a crime. Bunch of meaningless technicalities like lying to FBI, and tax evasion. Whoop Dee Do.At this point they are just chickens with the heads cut off. Overwhelming evidence with multiple convictions and indictments, to go along with immunity deals from Trump associates. Their denials are insane at this point.You keep saying that...Let us know when you're done jerking yourself off to yet another of Mueller's nothing burger guilty pleas.In spite of Trumps dismissiveness over Manaforts role, Manafort was heavily involved in the Trump campaign. He was involved in key meetings, had private conversations, knows what Trump knows and what he saidWow
Talk about dream world
Then why is Manafort cooperating?
This is why...
Paul Manafort's Guilty Plea: Second Trial Held No Benefit | National Review
Naturally, the media are spun up because the plea agreement, which will cap the 69-year-old Manafort’s prison time at ten years, requires Manafort’s cooperation. Anti-Trumpers have visions of the walls closing in on the president. I would counter with what I said after the Virginia convictions:
At this point, it does not appear that Mueller has a collusion case against Trump associates. His indictments involving Russian hacking and troll farms do not suggest complicity by the Trump campaign.
I also find it hard to believe Mueller sees Manafort as the key to making a case on Trump when Mueller has had [Richard] Gates — Manafort’s partner — as a cooperator for six months. You have to figure Gates knows whatever Manafort knows about collusion. Yet, since Gates began cooperating with the special counsel, Mueller has filed the charges against Russians that do not implicate Trump, and has transferred those cases to other Justice Department components.
I elaborated that, when it comes to Manafort, Mueller’s focus is not President Trump. It is Russia, “specifically, Manafort’s longtime connections to Kremlin-connected operatives.” This seems consistent with what Manafort’s camp is telling the press. Politico quotes a source close to Trump’s former campaign chairman: “The cooperation agreement does not involve the Trump campaign. . . .There was no collusion with Russia.”
The guilty plea serves Mueller’s purposes. He already had Manafort looking at a potential 80 years of prison exposure from the first case. He did not need another trial and additional jail time to ratchet up pressure. So prosecutors dropped the money-laundering charges as well as allegations that Manafort made false statements and failed to register as a foreign agent of a Kremlin-connected Ukranian party; but Mueller still got Manafort to admit to the underlying conduct in those charges by having the defendant plead guilty to the special counsel’s favorite device, the amorphous, elastic charge of “conspiracy against the United States.” In addition, Manafort pled guilty to obstructing justice — the witness-tampering allegation based on which he has been detained without bail.
Manafort is facing serious jail time and money laundering is nothing to sneeze at.
Collusion with Russia is not the end of this investigation. Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, tax evasion, malfeasance are all on the table
Manafort is quietly building a case
By his constant tweeting, Trump is obviously worried
Nothing Burger means there is nothing there
Mueller is getting convictions of top Trump aids
More importantly, he is getting their testimony on the inside of Trumps presidency
Mueller is getting convictions! On what, parking tickets, not paying taxes, and campaign finance violations. Nothing burger. Waste of time and money.You keep saying that...Let us know when you're done jerking yourself off to yet another of Mueller's nothing burger guilty pleas.In spite of Trumps dismissiveness over Manaforts role, Manafort was heavily involved in the Trump campaign. He was involved in key meetings, had private conversations, knows what Trump knows and what he saidWowYou really are a stupid person..... if anything, Mueller let manafort out of the last trial because he wants this over because there is nothing here and he is already looking like an idiot.....
Talk about dream world
Then why is Manafort cooperating?
This is why...
Paul Manafort's Guilty Plea: Second Trial Held No Benefit | National Review
Naturally, the media are spun up because the plea agreement, which will cap the 69-year-old Manafort’s prison time at ten years, requires Manafort’s cooperation. Anti-Trumpers have visions of the walls closing in on the president. I would counter with what I said after the Virginia convictions:
At this point, it does not appear that Mueller has a collusion case against Trump associates. His indictments involving Russian hacking and troll farms do not suggest complicity by the Trump campaign.
I also find it hard to believe Mueller sees Manafort as the key to making a case on Trump when Mueller has had [Richard] Gates — Manafort’s partner — as a cooperator for six months. You have to figure Gates knows whatever Manafort knows about collusion. Yet, since Gates began cooperating with the special counsel, Mueller has filed the charges against Russians that do not implicate Trump, and has transferred those cases to other Justice Department components.
I elaborated that, when it comes to Manafort, Mueller’s focus is not President Trump. It is Russia, “specifically, Manafort’s longtime connections to Kremlin-connected operatives.” This seems consistent with what Manafort’s camp is telling the press. Politico quotes a source close to Trump’s former campaign chairman: “The cooperation agreement does not involve the Trump campaign. . . .There was no collusion with Russia.”
The guilty plea serves Mueller’s purposes. He already had Manafort looking at a potential 80 years of prison exposure from the first case. He did not need another trial and additional jail time to ratchet up pressure. So prosecutors dropped the money-laundering charges as well as allegations that Manafort made false statements and failed to register as a foreign agent of a Kremlin-connected Ukranian party; but Mueller still got Manafort to admit to the underlying conduct in those charges by having the defendant plead guilty to the special counsel’s favorite device, the amorphous, elastic charge of “conspiracy against the United States.” In addition, Manafort pled guilty to obstructing justice — the witness-tampering allegation based on which he has been detained without bail.
Manafort is facing serious jail time and money laundering is nothing to sneeze at.
Collusion with Russia is not the end of this investigation. Obstruction of Justice, Money Laundering, tax evasion, malfeasance are all on the table
Manafort is quietly building a case
By his constant tweeting, Trump is obviously worried
Nothing Burger means there is nothing there
Mueller is getting convictions of top Trump aids
More importantly, he is getting their testimony on the inside of Trumps presidency
Comey admitted he stopped being a republican decades ago, and he is clearly now a Democrat. And the rest on that list are all crooked corrupt criminals that need to be locked up. Keep up will ya?They were Conservatives until their integrity kicked in and they had to prosecute crimesWow, Comey, Strock, Mc Cabe, Brenner, etc. and Mueller's band of angry Dems are staunch conservatives. Ha ha ha. That was a good joke.Republicans control Congress
Republicans run the Justice Department
What exactly are Democrats investigating?
See that's what Trumpeters don't understand, when it comes to real justice, there are no party lines, only the line of guilty or not guilty.
What you don't understand is the leadership of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA were stocked with obama loyalists who used the powers of the Federal Government to spy on reporters, the senate and on the opposition political party....you dope.
DEEP STATE!
FBI, DOJ and CIA are stocked with Conservatives
Always have been
Sarah Carter and Jarrett as well as Joe Digenova two reporters and lawyer with contacts in the DOJ are telling Sean Hannity that mueller and rosenstein are looking for a way to wrap up the investigation....and will not release a report, but simply claim their current convictions of Flynn, Manafort and popadopolous are enough.....
This was on Hannity's radio show today........the plea deal with Manafort, for nothing involving Russia, seems to be a clue in that direction....
Oh great, another Libtard jerkoff chimes in, forgetting that Hillary is a crooked criminal that stole the nomination from Sanders, smashed and erased cell phones and 30,000 emails to hide evidence of her criminality, and then paid for a fake Russian dossier to conspire with Obama admin officials to spy on, frame and derail Trump. If justice were truly to be served, Hillary snd about 20 other high ranking Obama officials would already be in prison for treason.Did Trump get 180 million funneled into his foundation from the Russians in exchange for our Uranium, like the Clintons? Did Trump pay for a fake Russian dossier to use it in a criminal conspiracy to spy in and frame Trump, like Hillary did? Did Trump get half a million for one hour speeches given in Russia, like the Clintons? Did Trump tell the Russian ambassador "I'll have more flexibility with missile defense after I get elected" like Obama did? Ya gotta love the fake outrage by the Left over Russian collusion when they themselves have a history of sucking Russian cork for decades!Trump stands in front of the world at Helsinki and defends Vladimir Putin.
The Trump campaign changes the republican party platform to make it favorable to Russia.
The Trump sons say money is pouring in from Russia.
And nitwits say there is nothing to do with Russia?
They have already been bitch slapped with truth. What does it take?
"Did Trump get 180 million funneled into his foundation from the Russians in exchange for our Uranium"
Well, no. He was aided by Putin, by appointing Manafort as his campaign manager, to dupe you into believing that money was funnelled into the independent non-profit charitable organization in order to get The Committee on Foreign Investments, which has nine members, including the secretaries of the treasury, state, defense, homeland security, commerce and energy; the attorney general; and representatives from two White House offices (the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy), which has no authority to stop a sale to somehow approve of a sale by a private company. The company was Uranium One which, at the time, had two licensed mining operations in Wyoming that amounted to about “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.,” Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.
In fact, there is no evidence that Clinton was even involved in the decision to not object to the sale.
Oh, and First, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to approve the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses in Wyoming from Uranium One to the Russian company. The NRC announced it approved the transfer on Nov. 24, 2010. But, as the NRC explained at the time, “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.”
Okay, so explain why this is a bad thing? Because uranium ore is used in power plants and nuclear missiles and nuclear missiles are bad? The U.S is estimated to have about 6,550 nuclear warheads. Russia has about 6,850. The US has about 99 nuclear power reactors. Russia has about 31 with 2012 plans to increase it to 59. Of the 440 reactors in the world, the US had far more than any other country.
Again, ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, obtaining a 51% stake in a private Canadian company, Uranium One which is licenced in Wyoming and “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.” And the Russian company would have to apply for and obtain an export license and “commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes” in accordance with “the U.S.-Russia Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation.” That would be for nuclear power reactors, that increase from 31 to 59 which falls short, by 40%, of the 99 in the US.
Okay, so Hillary was not involved in a minor decision to not disapprove of a sale of a stake by a Canadian company with licences in Wyoming that could no export the Uranium to a Russian nuclear power company. And this is bad because uranium is used in nuclear missiles of which the US and Russia both have almost 7 thousand each.
And The NY Times claims that the independent charitable foundation called the Clinton Foundation, which has their name because they started it, and has projects like connecting patients to essential treatment, where millions of people continue to die unnecessarily from AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and other treatable diseases received a donation from individuals investors (stock holders) in Uranium One through a charitable organization.
As well, in 10 years as a private citizen, Clinton has delivered a total of 417 paid speeches and earned an average of $181,000 per event. Almost two-thirds of his total speech earnings, about $44.9 million, have come from 215 overseas events in 48 countries. One of those was from a June 2010 event in Moscow organized by Renaissance Capital which reportedly has ties to "the Kremlin".
Now, this grand conspiracy which, I am sure is to complicated for you to even read, let alone research, is somehow comparable to the facts that
Paul Manafort was running a campaign in the US to discredit HIllary Clinton who was well knows as a pain in Putin's ass.
And he was "hired" for free by Trump to run the his campaign
And connected the Trump team with a known Russian lawyer
Who was known to be as proven by Trump Jr's own emails
To get dirt on Hillary Clinton
That Trump made clear to be emails illegally hacked from the Democratic National Committee.
And numerous Trump associates have plead guilty to crimes.
And this is just the start of the Mueller investigation.
But it's all a conspiracy by every national news agency and only FOX News it telling the truth.
Oh, wait, except FOX news doesn't do it's own investigative reporting. They rely on reporting from the failing New York Times and the lying CNN to pick and choose tenuous alternative facts that they add 99% of conspiracy theory to in order to prove that the failing New York Times and the lying CNN are part of a grand conspiracy against Trump and Republicans.
No wonder you are confused.
Sure! Comey, a democrat as you claimed, single handily, destroyed Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency during the campaign period TWICE, and kept from the American people that the Trump Campaign was being investigated for their relationship with the Russians who orchestrated the hacking and theft of the private records of the DNC/DCCC/Campaign, was the perfect example of how Comey is a Democrat, eh?Comey admitted he stopped being a republican decades ago, and he is clearly now a Democrat. And the rest on that list are all crooked corrupt criminals that need to be locked up. Keep up will ya?They were Conservatives until their integrity kicked in and they had to prosecute crimesWow, Comey, Strock, Mc Cabe, Brenner, etc. and Mueller's band of angry Dems are staunch conservatives. Ha ha ha. That was a good joke.See that's what Trumpeters don't understand, when it comes to real justice, there are no party lines, only the line of guilty or not guilty.
What you don't understand is the leadership of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA were stocked with obama loyalists who used the powers of the Federal Government to spy on reporters, the senate and on the opposition political party....you dope.
DEEP STATE!
FBI, DOJ and CIA are stocked with Conservatives
Always have been
Sure! Comey, a democrat as you claimed, single handily, destroyed Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency during the campaign period TWICE, and kept from the American people that the Trump Campaign was being investigated for their relationship with the Russians who orchestrated the hacking and theft of the private records of the DNC/DCCC/Campaign, was the perfect example of how Comey is a Democrat, eh?Comey admitted he stopped being a republican decades ago, and he is clearly now a Democrat. And the rest on that list are all crooked corrupt criminals that need to be locked up. Keep up will ya?They were Conservatives until their integrity kicked in and they had to prosecute crimesWow, Comey, Strock, Mc Cabe, Brenner, etc. and Mueller's band of angry Dems are staunch conservatives. Ha ha ha. That was a good joke.What you don't understand is the leadership of the FBI, DOJ, and CIA were stocked with obama loyalists who used the powers of the Federal Government to spy on reporters, the senate and on the opposition political party....you dope.
DEEP STATE!
FBI, DOJ and CIA are stocked with Conservatives
Always have been
GET A CLUE, please!!!
I do not know if he is or is not in trouble, we have not seen the reporting from Mueller's team, yet.Sure! Comey, a democrat as you claimed, single handily, destroyed Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency during the campaign period TWICE, and kept from the American people that the Trump Campaign was being investigated for their relationship with the Russians who orchestrated the hacking and theft of the private records of the DNC/DCCC/Campaign, was the perfect example of how Comey is a Democrat, eh?Comey admitted he stopped being a republican decades ago, and he is clearly now a Democrat. And the rest on that list are all crooked corrupt criminals that need to be locked up. Keep up will ya?They were Conservatives until their integrity kicked in and they had to prosecute crimesWow, Comey, Strock, Mc Cabe, Brenner, etc. and Mueller's band of angry Dems are staunch conservatives. Ha ha ha. That was a good joke.DEEP STATE!
FBI, DOJ and CIA are stocked with Conservatives
Always have been
GET A CLUE, please!!!
You must be nervous since Mueller is also a Republican and is Comey's mentor and good friend. Based on this logic, Trump should be in the clear.
Oh great, another Libtard jerkoff chimes in, forgetting that Hillary is a crooked criminal that stole the nomination from Sanders, smashed and erased cell phones and 30,000 emails to hide evidence of her criminality, and then paid for a fake Russian dossier to conspire with Obama admin officials to spy on, frame and derail Trump. If justice were truly to be served, Hillary snd about 20 other high ranking Obama officials would already be in prison for treason.Did Trump get 180 million funneled into his foundation from the Russians in exchange for our Uranium, like the Clintons? Did Trump pay for a fake Russian dossier to use it in a criminal conspiracy to spy in and frame Trump, like Hillary did? Did Trump get half a million for one hour speeches given in Russia, like the Clintons? Did Trump tell the Russian ambassador "I'll have more flexibility with missile defense after I get elected" like Obama did? Ya gotta love the fake outrage by the Left over Russian collusion when they themselves have a history of sucking Russian cork for decades!Trump stands in front of the world at Helsinki and defends Vladimir Putin.
The Trump campaign changes the republican party platform to make it favorable to Russia.
The Trump sons say money is pouring in from Russia.
And nitwits say there is nothing to do with Russia?
They have already been bitch slapped with truth. What does it take?
"Did Trump get 180 million funneled into his foundation from the Russians in exchange for our Uranium"
Well, no. He was aided by Putin, by appointing Manafort as his campaign manager, to dupe you into believing that money was funnelled into the independent non-profit charitable organization in order to get The Committee on Foreign Investments, which has nine members, including the secretaries of the treasury, state, defense, homeland security, commerce and energy; the attorney general; and representatives from two White House offices (the United States Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy), which has no authority to stop a sale to somehow approve of a sale by a private company. The company was Uranium One which, at the time, had two licensed mining operations in Wyoming that amounted to about “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.,” Uranium One announced it had signed an agreement that would give “not less than 51%” of the company to JSC Atomredmetzoloto, or ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, the Russian nuclear energy agency.
In fact, there is no evidence that Clinton was even involved in the decision to not object to the sale.
Oh, and First, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had to approve the transfer of two uranium recovery licenses in Wyoming from Uranium One to the Russian company. The NRC announced it approved the transfer on Nov. 24, 2010. But, as the NRC explained at the time, “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.”
Okay, so explain why this is a bad thing? Because uranium ore is used in power plants and nuclear missiles and nuclear missiles are bad? The U.S is estimated to have about 6,550 nuclear warheads. Russia has about 6,850. The US has about 99 nuclear power reactors. Russia has about 31 with 2012 plans to increase it to 59. Of the 440 reactors in the world, the US had far more than any other country.
Again, ARMZ, the mining arm of Rosatom, obtaining a 51% stake in a private Canadian company, Uranium One which is licenced in Wyoming and “no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.” And the Russian company would have to apply for and obtain an export license and “commit to use the material only for peaceful purposes” in accordance with “the U.S.-Russia Atomic Energy Act Section 123 agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation.” That would be for nuclear power reactors, that increase from 31 to 59 which falls short, by 40%, of the 99 in the US.
Okay, so Hillary was not involved in a minor decision to not disapprove of a sale of a stake by a Canadian company with licences in Wyoming that could no export the Uranium to a Russian nuclear power company. And this is bad because uranium is used in nuclear missiles of which the US and Russia both have almost 7 thousand each.
And The NY Times claims that the independent charitable foundation called the Clinton Foundation, which has their name because they started it, and has projects like connecting patients to essential treatment, where millions of people continue to die unnecessarily from AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and other treatable diseases received a donation from individuals investors (stock holders) in Uranium One through a charitable organization.
As well, in 10 years as a private citizen, Clinton has delivered a total of 417 paid speeches and earned an average of $181,000 per event. Almost two-thirds of his total speech earnings, about $44.9 million, have come from 215 overseas events in 48 countries. One of those was from a June 2010 event in Moscow organized by Renaissance Capital which reportedly has ties to "the Kremlin".
Now, this grand conspiracy which, I am sure is to complicated for you to even read, let alone research, is somehow comparable to the facts that
Paul Manafort was running a campaign in the US to discredit HIllary Clinton who was well knows as a pain in Putin's ass.
And he was "hired" for free by Trump to run the his campaign
And connected the Trump team with a known Russian lawyer
Who was known to be as proven by Trump Jr's own emails
To get dirt on Hillary Clinton
That Trump made clear to be emails illegally hacked from the Democratic National Committee.
And numerous Trump associates have plead guilty to crimes.
And this is just the start of the Mueller investigation.
But it's all a conspiracy by every national news agency and only FOX News it telling the truth.
Oh, wait, except FOX news doesn't do it's own investigative reporting. They rely on reporting from the failing New York Times and the lying CNN to pick and choose tenuous alternative facts that they add 99% of conspiracy theory to in order to prove that the failing New York Times and the lying CNN are part of a grand conspiracy against Trump and Republicans.
No wonder you are confused.
Sarah Carter and Jarrett as well as Joe Digenova two reporters and lawyer with contacts in the DOJ are telling Sean Hannity that mueller and rosenstein are looking for a way to wrap up the investigation....and will not release a report, but simply claim their current convictions of Flynn, Manafort and popadopolous are enough.....
This was on Hannity's radio show today........the plea deal with Manafort, for nothing involving Russia, seems to be a clue in that direction....
What is your proven "FBI corruption"? Or are you just lying about that?Hard to believe there won't be a report out of it all, after all this time spent. Wonder if they bothered to look at Hillary and the Dems at all.
They may be looking for ways to cover their own asses now.
I won't be surprised if the reason for ending the Russia investigation is so that the investigation of FBI corruption can be down played, no one is charged and Wray sweeps everything under the rug with implementing new special safeguards.
The latest corruption uncovered was the FBI massive leaking to reporters.
That's Mikey Tikey for ya. The USMB Dumb Cluck. What an honor.You turds really need new material.And when this is proven to be false…will you stop regarding what you hear on Fox News as truthful?
Of course not.
Regressive liberal ROE
1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.
2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect
3. Ignore any facts presented.
4. Ridicule spelling and typos, punctuation.
5. Attack the person as being juvenile, ie: "are you 12 years old", question their education, intelligence, Age
6. Employ misdirection,
6a. smear people
6b. attack religion
6c. attack their rationality.
7. Lie, make false assumptions
8. Play race/gender card/misogynist card
9. Play gay/lesbian card
10. Play the Nazi/Fascist/bigot card
11. Make up stuff/So you got nothing?
12. Deny constantly
13. Reword and repeat
14. Pretending not to understand, playing ignorant/what did I lie about
15. When losing, resort to personal attacks.
16. Russia
17. Fox News/Alex Jones/Brietbart/infowars/Stormfront/Gateway/hannity
18. You can’t read.
19. Trump Trump Trump TrumpTrump Trump
excuse me but how is this any different from the typical conservative response? methinks you merely accuse your enemies of your own crimes.
and by the way....you forgot to call us LIBTARDS......
What was this ''massive leaking'' by the FBI???What is your proven "FBI corruption"? Or are you just lying about that?Hard to believe there won't be a report out of it all, after all this time spent. Wonder if they bothered to look at Hillary and the Dems at all.
They may be looking for ways to cover their own asses now.
I won't be surprised if the reason for ending the Russia investigation is so that the investigation of FBI corruption can be down played, no one is charged and Wray sweeps everything under the rug with implementing new special safeguards.
The latest corruption uncovered was the FBI massive leaking to reporters.