Russian Oligarch, Chris Steele, The DOJ And A Clear Case Of Collusion

[AntonToo]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

The person who cannot even spell "receiving" is stating that they are smarter than Alan Dershowitz, the preeminent constitutional lawyer in the US. You cannot make this stuff up.

Misspelled word...thats your counter argument?

My case must be rock solid.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

 

[AntonToo]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

Senior Trump campaign members loving the idea of getting dirt on Hillary from Russians and holding a meeting with them to get it....is NOT evidence of collusion?

I'd say that statement constitutes good evidence that you are fucking stupid.

Absolutely it is evidence and the only question now is if it is ENOUGH evidence to convict.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

Senior Trump campaign members loving the idea of getting dirt on Hillary from Russians and holding a meeting with them to get it....is NOT evidence of collusion?

I'd say we have evidence that you are totally fucking brain dead.

The evidence points to you being incorrect. You're emotional and devoid of any logic or substance.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

Senior Trump campaign members loving the idea of getting dirt on Hillary from Russians and holding a meeting with them to get it....is NOT evidence of collusion?

I'd say we have evidence that you are totally fucking brain dead.

The evidence points to you being incorrect. You're emotional and devoid of any logic or substance.

No it points to me being very correct.

Facts are very straight forward and public. When you post baseless denial you just look silly.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

Senior Trump campaign members loving the idea of getting dirt on Hillary from Russians and holding a meeting with them to get it....is NOT evidence of collusion?

I'd say we have evidence that you are totally fucking brain dead.

The evidence points to you being incorrect. You're emotional and devoid of any logic or substance.

No it points to me being very correct.

Facts are very stright forward and public.

No, it just points to you being a biased hack. Thats all.

 

[DJT for Life]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

The part where Mark Warner contacted that Russian Oligarch for him to
contact Chris Steele, so that Warner could get dirt on the POTUS, but didn't
want to leave a paper trail. That part.

 

[AntonToo]

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

Senior Trump campaign members loving the idea of getting dirt on Hillary from Russians and holding a meeting with them to get it....is NOT evidence of collusion?

I'd say we have evidence that you are totally fucking brain dead.

The evidence points to you being incorrect. You're emotional and devoid of any logic or substance.

No it points to me being very correct.

Facts are very stright forward and public.

No, it just points to you being a biased hack. Thats all.

Facts are not biased.

If that IS NOT evidence of Trump campaign conspiring to collude with Russian government, then you have to explain WTF this is.

 

[Claudette]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

The part where Mark Warner contacted that Russian Oligarch for him to
contact Chris Steele, so that Warner could get dirt on the POTUS, but didn't
want to leave a paper trail. That part.

That's the part they don't want to believe.

Hell Hitlery and the DNC paid Steele for that bogus dossier. Seems to me if they can call a pay off to Stormy a violation then what they paid Steele is the same.

 

[dudmuck]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

no evidence? just in the latest: anticipating Trump Junior indictment.

if hillary, fusion, russia were colluding, then colluding to what end? nobody knew about the dossier (publicly) prior to the vote.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

no evidence? just in the latest: anticipating Trump Junior indictment.

if hillary, fusion, russia were colluding, then colluding to what end? nobody knew about the dossier (publicly) prior to the vote.

Colluding to pass on false infomation to help her in the election. Come on, this isn't difficult. The DNC paid for this fake document.

 

[AntonToo]

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

no evidence? just in the latest: anticipating Trump Junior indictment.

if hillary, fusion, russia were colluding, then colluding to what end? nobody knew about the dossier (publicly) prior to the vote.

Colluding to pass on false infomation to help her in the election. Come on, this isn't difficult. The DNC paid for this fake document.

Yep, Kremlin was colluding with Hillary, who's guts it hated...to piss on Russia and get her elected...so she can continue to bash Putin's regime and advocate sanctions against Russia from the White House.

Makes sense.

Meanwhile we have Trump campaign as a MATTER OF FACT taking a meeting with Russian government reps, eager for some co-operation - and THAT is supposedly NOT evidence of collusion.


Do you know how fucking delusional you Trumpsters sound?

 

[basquebromance]

there was no Trump campaign. it was just Trump himself giving speeches. and when it worked, they want to take it all away from him

 

[Siete]

More desperate thrashing around by our resident tRumpkins.

You’re President sends his best regards.

I'm the president?

you just witnessed another Trumpdrone showcasing the demographic profile.

 

[jon_berzerk]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

 

[Weatherman2020]

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

no evidence? just in the latest: anticipating Trump Junior indictment.

if hillary, fusion, russia were colluding, then colluding to what end? nobody knew about the dossier (publicly) prior to the vote.

Colluding to pass on false infomation to help her in the election. Come on, this isn't difficult. The DNC paid for this fake document.

Yep, Kremlin was colluding with Hillary, who's guts it hated...to piss on Russia and get her elected...so she can continue to bash Putin's regime and advocate sanctions against Russia from the White House.

Makes sense.

Meanwhile we have Trump campaign as a MATTER OF FACT taking a meeting with Russian government reps, eager for some co-operation - and THAT is supposedly NOT evidence of collusion.


Do you know how fucking delusional you Trumpsters sound?

Since when is The Hill a Trump fan?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

No, there is no evidence. But there is evidence of clinton, fbi, russia, fusion, collusion.

no evidence? just in the latest: anticipating Trump Junior indictment.

if hillary, fusion, russia were colluding, then colluding to what end? nobody knew about the dossier (publicly) prior to the vote.

Colluding to pass on false infomation to help her in the election. Come on, this isn't difficult. The DNC paid for this fake document.

Yep, Kremlin was colluding with Hillary, who's guts it hated...to piss on Russia and get her elected...so she can continue to bash Putin's regime and advocate sanctions against Russia from the White House.

Makes sense.

Meanwhile we have Trump campaign as a MATTER OF FACT taking a meeting with Russian government reps, eager for some co-operation - and THAT is supposedly NOT evidence of collusion.


Do you know how fucking delusional you Trumpsters sound?

There is no matter of fact. There is no evidence. Quiy lying.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

The person who cannot even spell "receiving" is stating that they are smarter than Alan Dershowitz, the preeminent constitutional lawyer in the US. You cannot make this stuff up.

Misspelled word...thats your counter argument?

My case must be rock solid.

You missed the Dershowitz part?

 

[Dragonlady]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

What illegal acts were these individuals and entities accused of committing?

 

[Claudette]

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

The person who cannot even spell "receiving" is stating that they are smarter than Alan Dershowitz, the preeminent constitutional lawyer in the US. You cannot make this stuff up.

Misspelled word...thats your counter argument?

My case must be rock solid.

You missed the Dershowitz part?

Of course he did. It doesn't say what he wants to believe. LOL