Russian Oligarch, Chris Steele, The DOJ And A Clear Case Of Collusion

[AntonToo]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

 

[jon_berzerk]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

pled

pled doesnt mean much

now mueller is backing away from the 13

charged --LOL

so as you are saying you have nothing

it will be fun to see you twisting your tit in a wringer

when the the collusion between the fbi mueller clinton and the Russians comes out

phony fisa warrants

fake dossier

 

[whitehall]

The term "collusion" seems to be thrown around so much that you would think it was a freaking crime. Administrations have to deal with foreign governments and the freaking CIA is up to their necks in collusion 24/7. So what's the problem? It was a redundant question. The problem is the collusion between the so-called "intelligence" agencies and the mainstream media for the purpose of a political coup.

 

[Weatherman2020]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

ANYDAY NOW!
Part 856

 

[AntonToo]

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

pled

pled doesnt mean much

now mueller is backing away from the 13

charged --LOL

so as you are saying you have nothing

it will be fun to see you twisting your tit in a wringer

when the the collusion between the fbi mueller clinton and the Russians comes out

phony fisa warrants

fake dossier

...dummy, pleading guilty is equivalent of getting convicted.

 

[AntonToo]

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

ANYDAY NOW!
Part 856

You know, there were tiny brained penguin lemmings just like you, talking just like you about Watergate investiation and how long it took.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

ANYDAY NOW!
Part 856

You know, there were tiny brained penguin lemmings just like you, talking just like you about Watergate investiation and how long it took.

I’m sure you’ll find Trump didn’t pay s landscaper on time and owes him $65.35.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

pled

pled doesnt mean much

now mueller is backing away from the 13

charged --LOL

so as you are saying you have nothing

it will be fun to see you twisting your tit in a wringer

when the the collusion between the fbi mueller clinton and the Russians comes out

phony fisa warrants

fake dossier

...dummy, pleading guilty is equivalent of getting convicted.

--LOL saying that and you calling someone dummy now that is funny ya idiot

 

[oreo]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

 

[Billy_Bob]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is perfectly legal.

Recieving, or conspiring to recieve campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Your ignorance is stunning.... Wait no it isn't...

Your forgetting that the dossier's author Steel was discredited and fired by the FBI. Ohr then became that back door shuttling the information from his wife at Fusion GPS to Andrew Wiseman who is still employed today by Mueller... And he did so with the full knowledge of superiors at both the DOJ and FBI. Ohr also informed congress that he made his conflict with his wife known to them as well.

Continue running around with your head up your ass...

 

[Vel]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

You mean willfully blind like those that ignore the fact that it was Clinton operatives that sent the Russians to try to set up Trump? That kind of willfully blind?

 

[Weatherman2020]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

yup it is time to start bringing charges against these treasonous bastards

LMAO

Which part of HItlery and the DNC paying Steele for a bogus dossier of dirt on Trump is "not compelling" for you??

Dummy, paying for private company to conduct opposition research is ethical and legal.

Reciving campaign contributions from adversarial governments who are looking to harm America is ILLEGAL, not to mention generally treasonous.


The evidence of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign is in fact compelling.

Bullshit.

Cohen paid Stormy and Trump paid him back. Hell they used their own money. To call that campaign fraud is ludicrous at best.

Oh as the Russians. No sign of collusion yet. And you can bet there won't be.

Oh and Barry's intelligence and cyber people were aware of the hack. Why they did nothing is beyond me and everyone else.

The FBI told the DNC IT guy to watch for hackers and he did nothing.

To bad. So sad. Light a candle.

If you do not see the FACT of Trump campaign eagerly looking to work with Russians for an edge in the presidential campaign as a sign of colllusion, then the only explanation is that you are wilfully blind.

It absolutely is a sign, wether or not you Trumpsters have the intelectual ability to admit it.

two fucking solid years of investigation and all they came up with

was crimes of someone else from years ago

not even related to the Russians

get real ya loser

Flynn and Papadopolous both pled guilty to lying to FBI about Russians.

13 Russian naitonals and companies were indicted.

Richard Pinedo - indicted for selling bank accounts to Russians who were conducting electioneering.

12 Russian intelligence officers were indicted for political hacking.

Manafort did get convicted of charges not yet directly related to Russians, but he and his Russian associate (Konstantin Kilimnik) were indicted on other charges - those hearings will begin shortly.

Who's been charged by Mueller in the Russia probe so far?


Trump&family will be indicted/impeached last ofcourse just because he happens to be a president.

Even Comey thought the Flynn charge was ludicrous. Comey pled to spare his family the annoyance. Has yet to be sentenced. He and Pap are in trouble for lying to the FBI not for selling secrets to Russia. Again yes or no? Are you saying you are more of an expert on this than the preeminent constitutional lawyer in this country and a lifelong Democrat btw?

Do tell.

 

[oreo]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

 

[Clementine]

 

[jillian]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

Not compelling only to the uninformed.

Mueller hadn’t told you what he has yet.

And if you don’t see where this is going, you are being intentionally obtuse.

Trumpkins are as delusional as their orange treasonous loon.

 

[Weatherman2020]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

If you want to insist Obama’s is responsible for Hillary losing because he told the FBI to stand down on Russia involvement in the election, I’m just going to not add anything.

 

[oreo]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

If you want to insist Obama’s is responsible for Hillary losing because he told the FBI to stand down on Russia involvement in the election, I’m just going to not add anything.

There is no doubt that Obama didn't want to be seen as interfering into the election himself, and was extremely slow at reacting to Russian interference. If he would have told you that Putin was colluding with Trump--admit it, you would have had a coniption shit fit over it.

And then again we might want to consider that Obama let this go on, to bring down the entire Republican party--knowing that it would.

In the final hours of Barack Obama's presidency, some White House officials reportedly raced to spread and preserve information about possible communications between associates of then-candidate Donald Trump and Russians.The New York Times, citing former American officials, reported that these officials were concerned that the information they were gaining on the Russian meddling in the election and the possible campaign contact could be compromised with the new administration, and they wanted to set up any future investigation with the information.According to The Times, after Obama asked for an investigation into Russian tampering into the elections, officials found some "damning" evidence.

Obama administration reportedly raced to preserve intelligence on possible contact between Russians and Trump associates

It appears that Trump & Company have been wholly outfoxed by Barack Obama--

At any rate it's all explained in this book.

 

[bripat9643]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

This is the FBI strong arm tactic to get false data or evidence. Best be sure that if you give anything they use you better stick with the story or they will get you on the flip side. I speak from knowledge on this subject having seen it used in several Fla cases. Even tho the suspects were guilty, false evidence was put in the case that I knew was false, and told to "shut up".