Russian Oligarch, Chris Steele, The DOJ And A Clear Case Of Collusion

[Dan Stubbs]

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Hey dumbass what part of Trump campaign meeting with Russian government reps to get dirt on Hillary "not compelling" enough for you?

Well it seems that is not a crime. When you consider the stuff Hilly was involved in that was of a Criminal Nature. This would be the same thing that all politicians do to get the background of the person they are running against. Some of the stuff might just be criminal and should be brought to the front so that the voters know about who they are voting for.

 

[oreo]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

There's plenty of evidence of collusion, you just don't want to admit you fucked up by supporting and or voting for Trump. It's very difficult for many to admit they were stupid enough to vote for the Russian Manchurian candidate, but you did.

At this link on this board you can read one article that was confirmed by James Clapper under sworn testimony over a year ago. Watch 2 FOX NEWS video's and another of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

 

[bripat9643]

We found the collusion.

In a 20-month search for evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s campaign and Russia, none that is compelling has emerged.

Former FBI Director James Comey told Congress he found none. The U.S. intelligence community has given a similar assessment, though it did prove convincingly that Moscow meddled in the 2016 election through cyber warfare. And, so far, special counsel Robert Mueller has not offered any collusion evidence, though his work continues.

But, for the first time, I can say there is evidence of collusion between Russians and Americans — specifically, the sort that is at the heart of counterintelligence work.

Before we review that evidence, let’s define collusion. The Collins Dictionary says its original British meaning was “secret or illegal cooperation, especially between countries or organizations.” Using that definition, collusion can be secret but good, if the outcome is well-intended. Or, it can be bad, if it is meant to defraud, deceive or create illegality.

Now for the evidence, as presented to me by several sources, American and foreign:

In September 2015, senior Department of Justice (DOJ) official Bruce Ohr and some FBI agents met in New York with Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to seek the Russian billionaire’s help on organized crime investigations. The meeting was facilitated — though not attended — by British intelligence operative Christopher Steele.

In 2012, Steele’s private firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, was hired as a subcontractor by a law firm working for Deripaska, who then headed Russia’s largest aluminum company. Steele’s firm was asked to do research to help the law firm defend a lawsuit filed against Deripaska by a business rival.

Russian oligarch, Justice Department and a clear case of collusion

You're basing it on the Dossier file which is completely WRONG, and it's what has been preached to you over the last 2 years. That the Russian investigation started because of the Dossier file. It didn't. James Comey has testified that the Russian investigation had nothing to do with the Dossier file. He started the Russian investigation in July 2016, months before the Dossier file ever showed up.

Trump surrogates were being picked up in daily routine spying operations of Russian intelligence agents by several different foreign countries since 2015, and that information was passed onto the FBI, long before the Dossier file was given to John McCain who then handed it over to James Comey--who basically said "yeah we know." Obviously, Trump surrogates weren't selling girl scout cookies to the Russians.

Go to this link you can read one article that was confirmed under sworn testimony over a year ago by James Clapper, and watch 2 FOX NEWS video's, and another video of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V. There is collusion everywhere. Click this link and it will redirect you to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

If you want to think a hundred thousand dollars spent in States Hillary was too stupid to not campaign in but Russia was smart enough too made Hillary lose, that’s your problem.

It had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. Her only mistake was underestimating the astounding ignorance in this country.

Vladimir Putin did change the outcome of the election, & James Clapper was the first to make that statement.

You can click this link on this board to see how he did it. To be honest it was brilliant. Targeting white conservative voters in swing states with adds especially designed for them, that were then shared by millions on social media outlets, while at the same time alienating Bernie Sanders supporters against Hillary Clinton. It worked. Click this link to redirect another post on this board. Here you can see some of the adds, and how it was done.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

And that time Trump invited the Russians to meet in the Oval office and gave them classified information. Click this link, to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

For the collusion, click this link to redirect to another post on this board.
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

3 different links to 3 different posts on this board.

There's plenty of evidence of collusion, you just don't want to admit you fucked up by supporting and or voting for Trump. It's very difficult for many to admit they were stupid enough to vote for the Russian Manchurian candidate, but you did.

At this link on this board you can read one article that was confirmed by James Clapper under sworn testimony over a year ago. Watch 2 FOX NEWS video's and another of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V
Do You Believe Based on Evidence, Russia Changed Outcome of 2016 Election

There isn't a shred of evidence for collusion, dumb fuck. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada.