TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2015
- 27,485
- 7,922
- Thread starter
- #141
Thank you for proving my point. You (stupidly - but that is beside the point) agree with Citizens United, so that is not "legislating from the bench-or judicial activism, and if it is, it's ok in this case.[
Geeez Wasted on you apparently because you're obviously unable to comprehend the issue that I raised. What was Citizens United?? was it based on evidence. Was it based on the constitution? Or was it partisan advocacy? Get fucking real!
Liberals Want to Overturn Citizens United. A New Study Shows Conservatives Do Too
Citizens United is the most important defense of the 1st Amendment in a hundred years. You seek to overturn CU because you seek to end the 1st Amendment - simple as that.