Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because of course Rustic is a liberal......No, just liberalsThankfully those days are long goneShe sucks hairy ass...Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
Remember the days when Conservatives could be friends with Liberals.....and even treat each other with respect....
View attachment 194917
The contards do hate civility.
I am calling you a pest ! What the fuck are you talking about.? Not only are you a pest but you're a lazy pest.You just posted a link to a lengthy article with no explanation as to how it is supposed to support whatever bizarre point that your trying to make. Lazy!!OOOK, so you are calling the NYT liars lolI have a news flash for you. It is the voices in your head that are telling you about well known things. They are well know to you and anyone else that you share the mass delusion with and that is all.You would not just be making that shit up , like you're known to do. When you make outlandish claims like that , you might want to include a source, even a bogus one, so that you don't look completely stupidGinsberg doesn't follow the constitution, and she is a left wing wacko.
Judge Ginsberg once said “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”
She has never satisfactorily explained who the Left Wingers do not want “too many of”.
She sounds like a genocidal racist.
well known things should not have to be sourced, but ok
"particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”
She slipped-up and was being candid.
The Place of Women on the Court
And what in the name of chirst is this link? Do you really think that anyone is going to read it and try to figure out what your point is. ?
I am calling you a pest ! What the fuck are you talking about.? Not only are you a pest but you're a lazy pest.You just posted a link to a lengthy article with no explanation as to how it is supposed to support whatever bizarre point that your trying to make. Lazy!!OOOK, so you are calling the NYT liars lolI have a news flash for you. It is the voices in your head that are telling you about well known things. They are well know to you and anyone else that you share the mass delusion with and that is all.You would not just be making that shit up , like you're known to do. When you make outlandish claims like that , you might want to include a source, even a bogus one, so that you don't look completely stupidGinsberg doesn't follow the constitution, and she is a left wing wacko.
Judge Ginsberg once said “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe(abortion) was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”
She has never satisfactorily explained who the Left Wingers do not want “too many of”.
She sounds like a genocidal racist.
well known things should not have to be sourced, but ok
"particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of”
She slipped-up and was being candid.
The Place of Women on the Court
And what in the name of chirst is this link? Do you really think that anyone is going to read it and try to figure out what your point is. ?
I mean like a Strict Constitutionalist does.You mean like the right wing of the court doesI wonder if you understand that it is not the job of any justice to oppose a political ideology, but to interpret law to ensure it meets with the US Constitution?Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
It seems that it has died, You get what you give, Liberals have not been very civil at all since Trump beat the hildabeast and Conservatives are just returning the gesture.Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
Well yes....because Scalia is dead.
So in your opinion- should all civility have died with Scalia?
Yeah, cons were the very pinnacle of civility during the Obama administration.It seems that it has died, You get what you give, Liberals have not been very civil at all since Trump beat the hildabeast and Conservatives are just returning the gesture.Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
Well yes....because Scalia is dead.
So in your opinion- should all civility have died with Scalia?
Liberals have not been very civil at all since Trump beat the hildabeast .Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
Well yes....because Scalia is dead.
So in your opinion- should all civility have died with Scalia?
I guess that was pretty "Deplorable" of meLiberals have not been very civil at all since Trump beat the hildabeast .Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
Well yes....because Scalia is dead.
So in your opinion- should all civility have died with Scalia?
I love the irony of you using the term hildabeast while whining that liberals have not been very civil at all......
Getting along is way overratedShe sucks hairy ass...Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
Remember the days when Conservatives could be friends with Liberals.....and even treat each other with respect....
View attachment 194917
Same difference, just Like global warming/global cooling/climate change…Ruth Bader is a geriatric socialist / commie who hates America and the Constitution.
Which makes a darling to the liberals and an idol to the far left.. ....
Of course anyone who doesn't push loony right wing policies is a socialist and a commie (despite socialism and communism being two very different things).
At least you are consistent. Your topics always get down to gays or pedos.Thank you for admitting that you actually believe that she is in favor of pedophilia. It is fucking moronic.No, YOU"RE lying by omission. You left this part outProof that bear513 is lying.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf
Stop lying.
Proof you are spinning this .
A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than twelve years old."
As with her opinion that the rights of workers should be equal to that of employers, this shows that she was actually saying the law should treat men and women equally.
Ginsburg and her coauthor argue that the law should be rewritten to outlaw sexual abuse of any minor, male or female, by any person who is significantly older, male or female (thereby obviating the absurd possibility that a 13-year-old boy would be prosecuted for seducing a 15-year-old girl).
And the part that you posted in, in no way an endorsement of pedophilia
If we are debating about it...she is guilty as charged. All you are doing is defending her asinine behavior .
The term is endearingLiberals have not been very civil at all since Trump beat the hildabeast .Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so
That was then, this is now.....
Well yes....because Scalia is dead.
So in your opinion- should all civility have died with Scalia?
I love the irony of you using the term hildabeast while whining that liberals have not been very civil at all......
She probably had him knocked off… LOLBecause of course Rustic is a liberal......No, just liberalsThankfully those days are long goneShe sucks hairy ass...
Remember the days when Conservatives could be friends with Liberals.....and even treat each other with respect....
View attachment 194917
The contards do hate civility.
She sucks hairy ass...
Ginsberg and Scalia were best friends- who disagreed vehemently about the law- but could appreciate each other even so.
We need more people like Ginsberg and Scalia and less like Rustic and Trump.
Thank you for that brilliant, eloquent and well thought out commentary. Clearly your one of the valued members here who consistently go all out to raise the level of intellectual discourse. You are a blessing.
No. She doesn’t Trump scum hate the constitution. Try agaonYou do know that she hates the U.S. Constitution, right?
Thank you for that brilliant, eloquent and well thought out commentary. Clearly your one of the valued members here who consistently go all out to raise the level of intellectual discourse. You are a blessing.
Your "brilliance is shining through here".....
Buh LIEVE it
BTW...if the SC was full of your beloved idiot clones, we'd all be poverty stricken by now and in a Jihad with all the ME friends she would have allowed in and China would be our masters.
You'RE such a first class ignoramus. Seriously.
You seem confused
