Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,396
- 2,180
No, YOU"RE lying by omission. You left this part outProof that bear513 is lying.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf
Stop lying.
Proof you are spinning this .
A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than twelve years old."
As with her opinion that the rights of workers should be equal to that of employers, this shows that she was actually saying the law should treat men and women equally.
Ginsburg and her coauthor argue that the law should be rewritten to outlaw sexual abuse of any minor, male or female, by any person who is significantly older, male or female (thereby obviating the absurd possibility that a 13-year-old boy would be prosecuted for seducing a 15-year-old girl).
And the part that you posted in, in no way an endorsement of pedophilia
If we are debating about it...she is guilty as charged. All you are doing is defending her asinine behavior .