Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
View attachment 194871
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
That was Obama's SOTU address. I guess she hates mulattos.She just can't stand to look at TrumpShe's so dynamic........
Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
View attachment 194871
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
I wonder if you understand that it is not the job of any justice to oppose a political ideology, but to interpret law to ensure it meets with the US Constitution?Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
View attachment 194871
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
View attachment 194871
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
From scopes?
Got to love the spin.
Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
View attachment 194871
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
Meant to post the rest - The accusation comes from a book called Sex Bias in the U.S. Code
The quote above was NOT written or supported by Ginsberg. It concerns that what was illegal for men was legal for women.
Stop lying.
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
From scopes?
Got to love the spin.
I don't know what "scopes" is and suspect you meant Snopes.
If you did mean Snopes ... Nopes.
Stop lying.
You're either a shameless liar or really stupid!Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
View attachment 194871
bear513
Yet another LIE from a LIAR.
Why can't RWNJs argue facts? This accusation is reprehensible. As are the comments above that she hates the constitution (this from a trumpanzee!!!!!!), that she's a Marxist (stupid, just stupid) and the rest of the RWNJ lies.
Please stop lying.
FACTS.
Why can't you ever state facts?
Those are the facts, she was arguing in 1974 to lower the age of consent to 12 years old..
Truth hurts
No?
You mean like the right wing of the court doesI wonder if you understand that it is not the job of any justice to oppose a political ideology, but to interpret law to ensure it meets with the US Constitution?Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
The sooner she goes away the better. She's an America fating commie bitch.Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
Fucking bullshit. When did she say that asshole?
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
From scopes?
Got to love the spin.
I don't know what "scopes" is and suspect you meant Snopes.
If you did mean Snopes ... Nopes.
Stop lying.
Did it on purpose , caught you because I know where your spin came from..
lolYou're either a shameless liar or really stupid!Also known as the notorious RBG, Justice Ginsburg, at 85 is showing no sign of slowing down or letting up on opposing the conservatives on the high court. On Monday, she delivered a scathing dissenting opinion on the narrowly decided labor relations case.
As she did on Monday in an important employee wage dispute, Ginsburg dons her classic dissenting collar -- black with silver crystal accents -- over her robe when she is about to take the unusual step of protesting a majority decision from the bench.
"Nothing compels the destructive result the court reaches today," she said, adding in her written opinion that the majority was "egregiously wrong," retrenching on 80 years of federal labor law that sought "to place employers and employees on more equal footing."
Here is more:
This Ruth Bader Ginsburg Dissent Is An Unforgettable Defense Of Workers' Rights In America
On Monday, the so-called Notorious RBG opposed the majority of her colleagues in a landmark decision that inhibits the ability for employees with mandatory arbitration contracts to collectively sue their employers. In a fiery dissent on workers' rights, Ruth Bader Ginsburg lambasted the conservative justices that decided in favor of bolstering mandatory arbitration clauses that frequently appear in employment contracts, describing the ruling as "egregiously wrong."
As part of her dissent, RBG warned that inhibiting the right for workers to collectively sue their employers for compensation-related issues, or other workplace problems, could pitch U.S. labor rights back nearly a century. "The end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th was a tumultuous era in the history of our Nation’s labor relations," Ginsburg wrote. "Under economic conditions then prevailing, workers often had to accept employment on whatever terms employers dictated."
View attachment 194871
bear513
Yet another LIE from a LIAR.
Why can't RWNJs argue facts? This accusation is reprehensible. As are the comments above that she hates the constitution (this from a trumpanzee!!!!!!), that she's a Marxist (stupid, just stupid) and the rest of the RWNJ lies.
Please stop lying.
FACTS.
Why can't you ever state facts?
Those are the facts, she was arguing in 1974 to lower the age of consent to 12 years old..
Truth hurts
No?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-ruth-bader-ginsburg-say-that-pedophilia-was-good-for-children/
Proof that bear513 is lying.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf
Stop lying.
She's so dynamic........
Bullshit she wanted to lower the age of consent to 12 years old in 1974 .
Here's the source of your lie.
Its clear. But lazy minded RWNJs refuse to actually fact check before spewing so the lie gets passed around. The worst is that even after RWNJs learn they are wrong, they continue to tell and retell the same lies.
From scopes?
Got to love the spin.
I don't know what "scopes" is and suspect you meant Snopes.
If you did mean Snopes ... Nopes.
Stop lying.
Did it on purpose , caught you because I know where your spin came from..
Stop lying.
If I had quoted Snopes, I would have linked to it.
Educate yourself.
Stop lying.
No, YOU"RE lying by omission. You left this part outProof that bear513 is lying.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG/pdf/GPO-CHRG-GINSBURG-2-4-3-12.pdf
Stop lying.
Proof you are spinning this .
A person is guilty of an offense if he engages in a sexual act with another person, not his spouse, and: (1) compels the other person to participate: (A) by force; or (B) by threatening or placing the other person in fear that any person will imminently be subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping; (2) has substantially impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the conduct by administering or employing a drug or intoxicant without the knowledge or against the will of such other person, or by other means; or (3) the other person is, in fact, less than twelve years old."
As with her opinion that the rights of workers should be equal to that of employers, this shows that she was actually saying the law should treat men and women equally.
Ginsburg and her coauthor argue that the law should be rewritten to outlaw sexual abuse of any minor, male or female, by any person who is significantly older, male or female (thereby obviating the absurd possibility that a 13-year-old boy would be prosecuted for seducing a 15-year-old girl).
