Ryan: There will be no tariffs for companies that take jobs overseas

[TheOldSchool]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

When much of our economy was driven by hunan slave labor? Jesus fucking Christ you loon.

 

[Toro]

Ryan is toast when Trump supports his opponent in the next election cycle.

We need to start a GoFundMe page to get rid of Ryan!

Who's in?

 

[Indeependent]

Ryan is toast when Trump supports his opponent in the next election cycle.

We need to start a GoFundMe page!

Who's in?

Trump has billions; he doesn't need anyone else's money to toss Ryan to the curb.

 

[Toro]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

Estimated per capita GDP growth in the United States in the 19th century was ~1.1%. In the 20th century, it was ~1.8%.

Mercantilism has long been a discredited theory in economics. It is the equivalent of economic Creationism.

It's wealth redistribution, pure and simple. It's why historically liberals and socialists opposed free trade and why conservatives and those believing in individual liberty supported it.

 

[Indeependent]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

Estimated per capita GDP growth in the United States in the 19th century was ~1.1%. In the 20th century, it was ~1.8%.

Mercantilism has long been a discredited theory in economics. It is the equivalent of economic Creationism.

It's wealth redistribution, pure and simple. It's why historically liberals and socialists opposed free trade and why conservatives and those believing in individual liberty supported it.

Yeah, it's the Old Bill Gates in a room with 1,000 people making 20K/year and all of a sudden, everyone's a multi-millionaire.
Any other BS up your sleeve?

 

[Correll]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

When much of our economy was driven by hunan slave labor? Jesus fucking Christ you loon.

I was thinking more of the growth of the industrial north including after the Civil War, and calling me a name does not change the historical facts.

Dumbass.

 

[Correll]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

Estimated per capita GDP growth in the United States in the 19th century was ~1.1%. In the 20th century, it was ~1.8%.

Mercantilism has long been a discredited theory in economics. It is the equivalent of economic Creationism.

It's wealth redistribution, pure and simple. It's why historically liberals and socialists opposed free trade and why conservatives and those believing in individual liberty supported it.

Discredited? Someone needs to tell all of our trading partners.

The WTO airbus ruling proves what we have now is not "Free Trade" it is just US being the world's bitch.

 

[Indeependent]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

Estimated per capita GDP growth in the United States in the 19th century was ~1.1%. In the 20th century, it was ~1.8%.

Mercantilism has long been a discredited theory in economics. It is the equivalent of economic Creationism.

It's wealth redistribution, pure and simple. It's why historically liberals and socialists opposed free trade and why conservatives and those believing in individual liberty supported it.

Discredited? Someone needs to tell all of our trading partners.

The WTO airbus ruling proves what we have now is not "Free Trade" it is just US being the world's bitch.

But that's Toro's bread and butter.

 

[whitehall]

Is that good news for the increasingly incoherent left or is it bad news?

 

[Edgetho]

For decades, especially after WWII, the USA negotiated Trade Treaties that favored the other Country.

We did it on purpose. Countries like China were trying to join the 20th Century and were at a distinct disadvantage. We could have crushed them economically if we tried to but -- We didn't want to. We WANTED them to succeed, so we gave them very favorable trade deals

After WWII we did the same thing with Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK..... Everybody that got their asses tore up in the War.

Hell, we practically gave away the Farm with the Marshall Plan. And what thanks do we get from the Euro-Weenies??? AND Japan

While we're giving away the store, while we're spending TRILLIONS protecting them from the Russians, they're geting fat as hell, giving their people free Health Care, Months of vacation -- Paid. Years of Maternity Leave -- Paid. Unemloyment benefits that we would kill for ---

All paid for by the American Taxpayer.

Same thing with China. When they were an emerging Market, we let them sell their stuff here with practically no duty on it. Even though it meant bankrupting American Industries and putting millions of Americans out of work.

Mexico is no different. They're always crying 'poor' and we're always trying to pull them out of their poverty. Been that way for over a hundred years.

Shit gets old. We're tired of one-way treaties that favor the other Country.

Sick and tired of it.

dimocrap scum would be on our side except for one thing.... dimocrap scum value party loyalty over EVERYTHING!!

"Party Uber Alles'' to dimocrap scum.

If Trump had a 'D' next to his name, they'd be in the streets in Brown Shirts marching to his drum beat.

 

[Indeependent]

For decades, especially after WWII, the USA negotiated Trade Treaties that favored the other Country.

We did it on purpose. Countries like China were trying to join the 20th Century and were at a distinct disadvantage. We could have crushed them economically if we tried to but -- We didn't want to. We WANTED them to succeed, so we gave them very favorable trade deals

After WWII we did the same thing with Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK..... Everybody that got their asses tore up in the War.

Hell, we practically gave away the Farm with the Marshall Plan. And what thanks do we get from the Euro-Weenies??? AND Japan

While we're giving away the store, while we're spending TRILLIONS protecting them from the Russians, they're geting fat as hell, giving their people free Health Care, Months of vacation -- Paid. Years of Maternity Leave -- Paid. Unemloyment benefits that we would kill for ---

All paid for by the American Taxpayer.

Same thing with China. When they were an emerging Market, we let them sell their stuff here with practically no duty on it. Even though it meant bankrupting American Industries and putting millions of Americans out of work.

Mexico is no different. They're always crying 'poor' and we're always trying to pull them out of their poverty. Been that way for over a hundred years.

Shit gets old. We're tired of one-way treaties that favor the other Country.

Sick and tired of it.

dimocrap scum would be on our side except for one thing.... dimocrap scum value party loyalty over EVERYTHING!!

"Party Uber Alles'' to dimocrap scum.

If Trump had a 'D' next to his name, they'd be in the streets in Brown Shirts marching to his drum beat.

I hope you're prepared to be insulted.

 

[Edgetho]

I hope you're prepared to be insulted.

You mean like they did to Trump all during the campaign?

How'd that work out for them??

 

[TheOldSchool]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

When much of our economy was driven by hunan slave labor? Jesus fucking Christ you loon.

I was thinking more of the growth of the industrial north including after the Civil War, and calling me a name does not change the historical facts.

Dumbass.

Yeah it was tariffs that powered the American industrial revolution

 

[blastoff]

Looks like Donald Trump doesn't even have a mandate in his own party:

“We’re not going to be raising tariffs,” Ryan said on “The Hugh Hewitt Show.”

- See more at: Ryan Bucks Trump, Says Congress Will Not Raise Tariffs

Companies that were scared about sending jobs to Mexico can now be in peace again.

It is also possible that Trump always knew that there would be no tariffs, but used this promise to make gullible protectionist vote for him.

Ryan must have forgotten him and Willard LOST the election. Trump is President Trump will do as he pleases. That little snowflake can fuck off or he can see his opponent in 2018 well funded to dethrone his ass.

Amen. RINOs who want to mess with the new sheriff in town face getting primaried by the guy they didn't support but the voters did. Get onboard or face the consequences. Simple choice really, and THAT'S how politics works in D.C.

 

[Indeependent]

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

When much of our economy was driven by hunan slave labor? Jesus fucking Christ you loon.

I was thinking more of the growth of the industrial north including after the Civil War, and calling me a name does not change the historical facts.

Dumbass.

Yeah it was tariffs that powered the American industrial revolution

It was slave labor.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Looks like Donald Trump doesn't even have a mandate in his own party:

“We’re not going to be raising tariffs,” Ryan said on “The Hugh Hewitt Show.”

- See more at: Ryan Bucks Trump, Says Congress Will Not Raise Tariffs

Companies that were scared about sending jobs to Mexico can now be in peace again.

It is also possible that Trump always knew that there would be no tariffs, but used this promise to make gullible protectionist vote for him.

lolol. Do I win the Nostradamus award for 2016? I predicted this. Not that predicting it was that hard.

 

[Indeependent]

Looks like Donald Trump doesn't even have a mandate in his own party:

“We’re not going to be raising tariffs,” Ryan said on “The Hugh Hewitt Show.”

- See more at: Ryan Bucks Trump, Says Congress Will Not Raise Tariffs

Companies that were scared about sending jobs to Mexico can now be in peace again.

It is also possible that Trump always knew that there would be no tariffs, but used this promise to make gullible protectionist vote for him.

lolol. Do I win the Nostradamus award for 2016? I predicted this. Not that predicting it was that hard.

I looks like SOMEONE here doesn't watch Trump interviews.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Looks like Donald Trump doesn't even have a mandate in his own party:

“We’re not going to be raising tariffs,” Ryan said on “The Hugh Hewitt Show.”

- See more at: Ryan Bucks Trump, Says Congress Will Not Raise Tariffs

Companies that were scared about sending jobs to Mexico can now be in peace again.

It is also possible that Trump always knew that there would be no tariffs, but used this promise to make gullible protectionist vote for him.

Did you actually read the article?

'“He strongly supports making our tax system border adjustable by exempting exports from tax and subjecting imports to tax,” she added, referring to a proposal in House Republicans’ tax overhaul blueprint that calls for moving to a “cash-flow based approach” to taxing businesses.'

"subjecting imports to tax" is what Trump promised to do with some imports. Clearly Ryan and Trump are on the same page on this.

So a tariff is or isn't a tax?

 

[toomuchtime_]

It's a shame that Trump doesn't understand how the government works and his promises won't come to pass. It means Trump voters won't learn how horrible the things they support can be.

Because a pro-jobs trade policy and deporting illegals are so crazy?

LOL!!

In the land of the Mad, the sane are vilified.

A policy of massive artificial controls on trade and the free market has never once in all of history been pro-jobs.

In the land of the mad, the mad are elected President.

Sure it was. See the 19th century.

Estimated per capita GDP growth in the United States in the 19th century was ~1.1%. In the 20th century, it was ~1.8%.

Mercantilism has long been a discredited theory in economics. It is the equivalent of economic Creationism.

It's wealth redistribution, pure and simple. It's why historically liberals and socialists opposed free trade and why conservatives and those believing in individual liberty supported it.

Mercantilism is what built the great economies of Europe and would still benefit the developed economies of the world at the expense of the developing economies or the world.

In theory free trade takes place on a level playing field, but when a developed country with higher wages, strict regulations on labor practices and the environment competes against a less developed country which has none of these, there is no level playing field and it will always benefit the less developed country at the expense of the more developed country.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Trump doesn't need Ryan's permission.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/20/u...rt-a-trade-war-with-surprising-ease.html?_r=0

Mr. Trump has said that as president he would “rip up” international trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, withdraw from the World Trade Organization and sharply raise the tariffs charged on goods imported from China and Mexico. As president he could pretty much do it. And there’s very little Congress can do to stop him, even if the result is a costly trade war.

What Trump doesn't know -- probably because he didn't borrow Khizr Khan's copy of the Constitution -- is that his ability as President to impose a tariff exists only because Congress has delegated that authority to Presidents. What Congress giveth, Congress can taketh away.