bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
That's Right, a president who doesn't want to bankrupt the country will keep vetoing the budget until what he doesn't want is removed. That is the power of the veto. If congress wants the spending they will have to override the veto. No veto, the president owns the budget, override the veto and Congress owns the budget. Period.There were never enough Dems to overcome a presidential veto so Reagan, Bush I and Bush II had the power to block any spending they didn't want.
That is a bit simplistic you realize. They would have had to Veto the entire budget as no line Item Veto Exists. Then the congress would just send up another one spending to much, and what they just keep vetoing them and let the government shut down?
You are over stating the power the president has when it comes to the budget. All he can do is veto the whole thing, or sign it. He can not force congress to remove certain spending programs.
The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
Drilling is still going on.The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
Bhoener hasn't tried to restrict drilling. Pelsoi has.
Colossal fail.
Drilling is still going on.The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
Bhoener hasn't tried to restrict drilling. Pelsoi has.
Colossal fail.
Crybaby Boner hasn't tried to restrict capping new wells. He still lets the oil monopoly cap new wells to keep the price high. Remember BP made a huge oil find in the Gulf, and what did they do, they CAPPED it rather than put that new oil on the market. It was a bad cap job and it exploded, but it didn't explode because they were pumping oil from it!!!!!!
The Dems realized only foreign oil companies, like from Brazil, will put the new oil they find on the market. CON$ are, of course, against any country that actually puts more oil on the market while Obama is president. CON$ want Americans to suffer as much as possible so the GOP can score cheap political points.
November 5, 2008
RUSH: I hope all your Joe the Plumbers are unemployed in six months! There.
October 31, 2008
RUSH: Joe the Plumber. Now, Joe the Plumber is an average citizen
The last Rasmussem Poll has the "Strongly Obama Approval" rating at 19%. So who are these people? Are they on the same level as Hitler and Castro? Did any of you conservatives ever think we would see the day where we would have an angry-anti-american leftist in office with millions of supporters who want him to collapse the system so that the Democrats would stay in power and steal all the billions from the rich to give back to all his staunch supporters? Isn't that where a chunk of the addition 4 Trillion of Obama debt went to? Buying More Votes For His Re-Election?
EdSchultzIsFat is now nominated and the leader for dumbest troll of the week. Some trolls are creative, some are provocative, some are funny, but only the very dumb qualify for dumbest. ESIF not only has the dumbest nom de plume, his posts are silly, childish, thoughtless and mean spirited. Never provocative or creative, ESIS is the essence of dumb; he is the archetype of dumb, and is beyond doubt qualified for dumbest troll of the week.
There were never enough Dems to overcome a presidential veto so Reagan, Bush I and Bush II had the power to block any spending they didn't want.
That is a bit simplistic you realize. They would have had to Veto the entire budget as no line Item Veto Exists. Then the congress would just send up another one spending to much, and what they just keep vetoing them and let the government shut down?
You are over stating the power the president has when it comes to the budget. All he can do is veto the whole thing, or sign it. He can not force congress to remove certain spending programs.
The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.Actually, using CON$ervative "logic," the last $1.50 increase is due to Crybaby Boner and the GOP house.
What "logic" is that? I'd really like to know.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
Drilling is still going on.The exact same "logic" you CON$ used to demonize Pelosi while the lying BushWacker was president. Crybaby Boner owns the increases in gas prices, inflation, debt etc., from the time the GOP took over the House just like you CON$ did with Pelosi.
CON$ always have a shit fit when their own rationalizations bite them in their ass.
Bhoener hasn't tried to restrict drilling. Pelsoi has.
Colossal fail.
Crybaby Boner hasn't tried to restrict capping new wells. He still lets the oil monopoly cap new wells to keep the price high. Remember BP made a huge oil find in the Gulf, and what did they do, they CAPPED it rather than put that new oil on the market. It was a bad cap job and it exploded, but it didn't explode because they were pumping oil from it!!!!!!
The Dems realized only foreign oil companies, like from Brazil, will put the new oil they find on the market. CON$ are, of course, against any country that actually puts more oil on the market while Obama is president. CON$ want Americans to suffer as much as possible so the GOP can score cheap political points.
That's Right, a president who doesn't want to bankrupt the country will keep vetoing the budget until what he doesn't want is removed. That is the power of the veto. If congress wants the spending they will have to override the veto. No veto, the president owns the budget, override the veto and Congress owns the budget. Period.There were never enough Dems to overcome a presidential veto so Reagan, Bush I and Bush II had the power to block any spending they didn't want.
That is a bit simplistic you realize. They would have had to Veto the entire budget as no line Item Veto Exists. Then the congress would just send up another one spending to much, and what they just keep vetoing them and let the government shut down?
You are over stating the power the president has when it comes to the budget. All he can do is veto the whole thing, or sign it. He can not force congress to remove certain spending programs.
The last Rasmussem Poll has the "Strongly Obama Approval" rating at 19%. So who are these people? Are they on the same level as Hitler and Castro? Did any of you conservatives ever think we would see the day where we would have an angry-anti-american leftist in office with millions of supporters who want him to collapse the system so that the Democrats would stay in power and steal all the billions from the rich to give back to all his staunch supporters? Isn't that where a chunk of the addition 4 Trillion of Obama debt went to? Buying More Votes For His Re-Election?
EdSchultzIsFat is now nominated and the leader for dumbest troll of the week. Some trolls are creative, some are provocative, some are funny, but only the very dumb qualify for dumbest. ESIF not only has the dumbest nom de plume, his posts are silly, childish, thoughtless and mean spirited. Never provocative or creative, ESIS is the essence of dumb; he is the archetype of dumb, and is beyond doubt qualified for dumbest troll of the week.
I think you're biased. Shaman is hands down the dumbest troll simply because he can't put together enough words to make a paragraph.
No, we are in this mess because of wasteful military spending by Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. The military industrial complex has bankrupted this country, as planned by the GOP, to limit spending on programs that help the American people.That's Right, a president who doesn't want to bankrupt the country will keep vetoing the budget until what he doesn't want is removed. That is the power of the veto. If congress wants the spending they will have to override the veto. No veto, the president owns the budget, override the veto and Congress owns the budget. Period.That is a bit simplistic you realize. They would have had to Veto the entire budget as no line Item Veto Exists. Then the congress would just send up another one spending to much, and what they just keep vetoing them and let the government shut down?
You are over stating the power the president has when it comes to the budget. All he can do is veto the whole thing, or sign it. He can not force congress to remove certain spending programs.
The point is idiot that we are in this mess because of all the big government unsustainable liberal social programs. We can't reform them because we are demagogue by the left if we do anything. our debt is driven by these programs. They cannot endure as they are, we can't raise taxes enough... We cannot sustain them, that is fact, get your head out of your ass
And who isn't sick of those far-Right & pansy CON$ervoFascist Commentators on FOX for whenever they get backed into a corner all they can use as an excuse for any of Bush's Screw Up's is "WELL,,WHEN CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT" or,,,WELL CLINTON DID THE SAME DAMN THING !!"And who isn't sick of those far-left & pansy Liberal Commentators on FOX for whenever they get backed into a corner by Beck,Hannity,Oreilly and The Rest ,,all they can use as an excuse for any of Obama's Screw Up's is "WELL,,WHEN BUSH WAS PRESIDENT" or,,,WELL BUSH DID THE SAME DAMN THING !!",,,,Right my conservative friends? All Of Obama's Screw Up's Were Caused By George Bush,,,,,Hmm,,,,Even taking Air-Force One On A Joy Ride In New York City???
And who isn't sick of those far-Right & pansy CON$ervoFascist Commentators on FOX for whenever they get backed into a corner all they can use as an excuse for any of Bush's Screw Up's is "WELL,,WHEN CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT" or,,,WELL CLINTON DID THE SAME DAMN THING !!"And who isn't sick of those far-left & pansy Liberal Commentators on FOX for whenever they get backed into a corner by Beck,Hannity,Oreilly and The Rest ,,all they can use as an excuse for any of Obama's Screw Up's is "WELL,,WHEN BUSH WAS PRESIDENT" or,,,WELL BUSH DID THE SAME DAMN THING !!",,,,Right my conservative friends? All Of Obama's Screw Up's Were Caused By George Bush,,,,,Hmm,,,,Even taking Air-Force One On A Joy Ride In New York City???
CON$ can dish the shit out, but whine like little children when the same crap bites them in their hypocritical ass.
(SFC Ollie Apr 2011)We can all point backwards and blame the other guy.
I would prefer to point forward and ask "what are you going to do about it?"
The cost of two unpaid for wars.
Trillions in tax cuts passed through "reconciliation" without a single "offset".
Trillions for Part D, again passed through "reconciliation", again without a single offset. The entire reason for Part D was to garner the votes from seniors.
An unregulated Wall Street.
Subsidies for oil companies.
Just the fact that the two largest and most expensive programs were passed through "reconciliation" tells you the entire story. Republicans have to be the most delusional political party that ever existed. Seriously. What else could it be?