Safe And Effective ®

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
94,544
66,449
3,605
Right coast, classified
Three of my sister-in-laws all have covid the last few weeks. Ages 65 and up. They get together often and go out to eat together. None of them took the jab. One is in the hospital after having a stroke but that was a day after a very bad reaction to monoclonal antibody infusion; she was immune compromised already from a bone infection she got at surgery a few years back. One got pretty sick but she is also very near a 5G tower and now on the mend. The other was pretty sick took two days off work and when we heard we asked if she wanted a it and we sent her a care package of natural goodies; she's totally better according to our conversation day two after care package; her guy got the jab and is still suffering terribly from his covid. The fourth sister-in-law did not get it at all; she walks every day and takes supplements.
 
The sheeple make me sick!:mad-61:



1639693398699.png
 
They are playing variant roulette. On today's Flutrackers board a 10 Dec 2021 report uses Fau Chi's famous mutation, the one he gets backwards in his video, with which to establish Omicron credibility.
First, the video. Fau gets the D614G mutation backwards where the girls asks him a question. Notice Fau says "assumption" starting @timepoint 6:45:
3 Jun 2021 post #406

Next, in this report, the use the D614G mutation because it is based on VSV pseudoparticles, VSV being the basis for ebola vaccine. But Fau Chi's "assumption" is based on in vitro (ex vivo) parameters:

'....D614G....Omicron may lead to more significant escape from immune protection....'

Many Homo sapiens will buy this authoritarian-looking scientific study. But then, SARS-CoV-1 at position 614 is Q (glutamine) while 613 is D (aspartic acid). As POSPOTUS JoeXi might ask, "What's the big deal?"
 
 

Forum List

Back
Top