Santos Expelled from House

[Procrustes Stretched]

Dem cheaters lost in 2020 and everyone knows it. You people are illegitimate.

Trump's own staff and family said he knew he lost.

 

[Papageorgio]

Not butthurt at all. Trying to show/prove how rules are enforced.

Gotcha, you’re a crybaby and a tattletale.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I don’t speak for the GOP, Dumpty.
Take some advice from Elon and go fuck yourself.

I have to take it out of your mouth first.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Gotcha, you’re a crybaby and a tattletale.

Believe what you want. It's nothing in the way of offense. What it is is something many have been banned over.

 

[Magnus]

Primary half of the GOP congresscritters who voted to oust him

Go for it. You have our blessing.

 

[Failzero]

Go for it. You have our blessing.

We need Newsmax and the New York Post ... blessing

 

[Papageorgio]

Believe what you want. It's nothing in the way of offense. What it is is something many have been banned over.

Evidence is that you are a crybaby, tattletale, sellout and loser. You can make all the excuses you want doesn’t change that you are a crybaby.

 

[initforme]

So big deal they kicked him out. Affects nobody.

 

[Magnus]

We need Newsmax and the New York Post ... blessing

Actually, you would need your orange fuhrer's blessing more than anything else.

 

[Orangecat]

I have to take it out of your mouth first.

What’s that, your mangina?

 

[Failzero]

Actually, you would need your orange fuhrer's blessing more than anything else.

If rather have Joe Rogan’s & EMs

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

So big deal they kicked him out. Affects nobody.

Then why comment?

 

[BackAgain]

It's about the authority of each house and it's enforcement of it's own rules. You questioned the constitutionality of the rules.

What suggested, you thicker than a brick lame-o, is just because the House ruoes may provide for a certain thing doesn’t mean that you t would pas the Constitutional sniff test.

Naturally, you’re still ducking the question. Your effeminate propensities to remain in hiding was expected and even predicted.

But the question remains. Is it your country intention that all that is required for the House to expel a Mwmber is the 2/3rds Supermajority agreeing to it.

It really is a straightforward question. Yes or no. Sack up.

 

[BackAgain]

You lobe being consistent, even if it's a consistency or wrongness.

I don’t lobe any such thing.

But you love running away. You pussy.

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 866676

View attachment 866680

Libturd Shittiing Bull wants to have it both ways. 100 Repbs voted for the expulsion.

They shouldn’t have. But they did.

And Chief Shitting Bull ignores that part not the story. What a pussy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evidence is that you are a crybaby, tattletale, sellout and loser. You can make all the excuses you want doesn’t change that you are a crybaby.

Then stop whining about it.

 

[BackAgain]

Posts #166 and #167 extreme violation. It was not an error with copying -- it's purposeful.


View attachment 866644

What a wuss.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Evidence is that you are a crybaby, tattletale, sellout and loser. You can make all the excuses you want doesn’t change that you are a crybaby.

nope. But your turn will come loser

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

What suggested, you thicker than a brick lame-o, is just because the House ruoes may provide for a certain thing doesn’t mean that you t would pas the Constitutional sniff test.

Naturally, you’re still ducking the question. Your effeminate propensities to remain in hiding was expected and even predicted.

But the question remains. Is it your country intention that all that is required for the House to expel a Mwmber is the 2/3rds Supermajority agreeing to it.

It really is a straightforward question. Yes or no. Sack up.

Whatever your talking about is some scenario living in your head. Some of us deal with the real world.

 

[BackAgain]

View attachment 866688

One thing in common. Zero convictions.