NightFox
Wildling
Do those companies provide fair wage rates, safe and clean workplace conditions and generous benefits? Perhaps, in those cases, organized labor is not necessary.In some cases that's exactly what they are, in others not, depends on the particular union you're talking about.Just because you have a cynical idea of what organized labor is and does on behalf of the workers, it does not bear truth.I have. The bottom line is we do not charge people who benefit from the actions that were not taken in their behalf. You may say that the unions are working in their behalf, but the truth is, the unions are working for their own purposes.The 40 hour week is federal law. The wages and benefits in a union shop that are greater than those protected by federal law are in place due to union/company negotiations. So, at least in my situation, the unions negotiated the wage rate, the benefits package and the workplace conditions. You need to consider that.I'm not sure if you can see this or not, but that argument is really weak.
Unions helped bring about a 40 hour work week decades ago. By your logic, everyone in America should pay the unions for that. The same for anything that helps other people.
We all should be paying dues to the phone switching company, the auto manufacturer; hell, the inventor of velcro or a thousand other things that help everyone.
Sorry, but it is un-American to require people to pay protection money. That's why it is against the law.
To Me, the dues being forced on nonmembers was nothing more than figuratively sending hired muscle into the neighborhood businesses and demanding extortion money so they wouldn't break the store owners legs.
I did, however; think that the SCOTUS would rule in favor of the Unions. Looks like I didn't call that one right.
You make unions sound as if they are the mafia extorting and robbing innocent companies.
Yeah it's been tried before and it works just fine, ask all the non-union workers at Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, etc..,etc..., if you need more details.If you want the lowest possible pay rates, the poorest workplace conditions and no benefits to the workers, fine. It's been tried before. But to what end?
What about the companies that do not provide fair wage rates, safe and clean workplace conditions and benefit packages? Do the workers there have a right to organize?
Of course they have a right to organize, freedom of association is an inherent human right, what they don't have a right to do is use government coercion to force employers into collective bargaining.
… and there is no such thing as "fair" wage rates, there are market rates if you think you deserve more than what the market thinks your labor is worth then you're living in fantasy land and you don't need unions for "safe and clean workplace conditions" we already have multiple government agencies at the Federal and State levels that regulate that.