Schiff Directing Witnesses Not To Answer GOP Questions

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,866
400
The Federalist ^ | 10/29/2019 | Tristan Justice

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is overseeing the ongoing illegitimate impeachment inquiry set in motion by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is reportedly telling witnesses testifying not to answer questions asked by Republican lawmakers.

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., slammed the hidden process claiming Schiff was instructing witnesses testifying behind the closed doors of the SCIF not to answer questions asked by Republican members.

“He’s directing witnesses not to answer questions that he doesn’t want the witness to answer if they’re asked by Republicans,” Scalise charged. “He’s not cut off one Democrat. He’s not interrupted one Democrat and told a witness not to answer Democrat members’ questions but today he started telling witnesses not to answer questions by certain Republicans.”

One question that Schiff barred a witness from answering reportedly came from Ohio Republican Congressman Jim Jordan who attempted to asked the initial anonymous “whistleblower” who they spoke with following the infamous July phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president.

“Adam Schiff says, ‘no-no-no we’re not going to let him answer that question,’” Jordan said as reported by Fox News.

The latest charges against Schiff come as the ongoing impeachment process has been rot with allegations of bias where Schiff has been conducting a closed-door investigation interviewing witnesses whose testimony has been selectively leaked to the press to frame the president.

The secrecy of the House proceedings followed by an array of leaked testimony to promote a false narrative being peddled by the corporate media prompted about 30 House Republicans led by Rep. Matt Gaetz, D-Fla., to storm the SCIF to demand previously denied records relating to the investigation.

Schiff is blocking GOP lawmakers from asking critical questions in the proceedings two days before Pelosi has set a tentative full-chamber vote to formalize the impeachment inquiry.

The text of the resolution was released Tuesday afternoon and denies Republicans subpoena powers. In both the Nixon and Clinton proceedings, the minority party was given this right.

-------------

WITNESS TAMPERING is no longer a CRIME? This sounds like a scenario right out of Mao's regime!!!!!
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
 
Why isn't this being brought before the SC.
This is absolutely fucking ridiculous!
We need to organize a nation wide protest through SM
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.

The prosecutor was fired because Joe Biden threatened Ukraine. Don't you watch the news?
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.

The prosecutor was fired because Joe Biden threatened Ukraine. Don't you watch the news?
Removing him was government policy and supported by other governments in Europe. They wanted him removed because he wasn't investigating things.

This is all out there, open your eyes.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.

The prosecutor was fired because Joe Biden threatened Ukraine. Don't you watch the news?
Removing him was government policy and supported by other governments in Europe. They wanted him removed because he wasn't investigating things.

This is all out there, open your eyes.

What governments? Ukraine doesn't belong to the EU. The clip of Biden threatening Ukraine and bragging about it on TV has been posted a couple of times the past week.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.
THAT IS NOT TRUE...
HE OPENED AN INVESTIGATION INTO BURISMA
THAT IS WHY ZLOCHEVSKYI FLED UKRAINE

THE REASON BURISMA WAS BEING INVESTIGATED
HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF INVESTIGATING
MONEY THAT WAS FUNNELED OUT OF UNB
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.

The prosecutor was fired because Joe Biden threatened Ukraine. Don't you watch the news?
Removing him was government policy and supported by other governments in Europe. They wanted him removed because he wasn't investigating things.

This is all out there, open your eyes.
USAID~ Ukraine

2009~ $195 Million
2010~ $315 Million
2011~ $291 Million
2012~ $283 Million
2013~ $254 Million
2014~ $308 Million
2015~ $272 Million
2016~ $513 Million
2017~ $511 Million
(2015-2017 PAYMENT WAIVED)

Gee, do those figures suggest corruption concerns
and how do you explain 2016-2017?
And what explanation do you offer for waiving loans
oh so conveniently from 2015-2017?

Money was funneled out of the UNB
through various shadow banks tied to Burisma subsidiaries
Money which found its way to HILLARY CLINTON

GO FUCK YOURSELF!
Barry Fife could figure this shit out
This is Whitewater wearing a disguise
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.
THAT IS NOT TRUE...
HE OPENED AN INVESTIGATION INTO BURISMA
THAT IS WHY ZLOCHEVSKYI FLED UKRAINE

THE REASON BURISMA WAS BEING INVESTIGATED
HAPPENED AS A RESULT OF INVESTIGATING
MONEY THAT WAS FUNNELED OUT OF UNB
And the $19 BILLION DOLLARS funneled out of the UNB
was money the IMF loaned Ukraine
The bulk of the stolen $19 Billion was under
the director of finance in Ukraine, Natalie Jaresko

THE SAME FUCKING WOMAN IN CHARGE OF
AID FOR PUERTO RICO RIGHT FUCKING NOW, SINCE 2017
AND FUNNY HOW $91 BILLION OF THAT MONEY IS NOW MIA

That's right, $91 BILLION DOLLARS IS UNACCOUNTED FOR

A woman who lived in Ukraine for 25 years,
was the director of finance over the UNB from 2014-2016
during which time $19 BILLION DOLLARS was stolen
funneled through shadow banks by way of shadow loans
tied to subsidiaries of Burisma holdings and Clinton donors
was put in charge of managing money for Puerto Rico

EXPLAIN THIS
 
The Federalist ^ | 10/29/2019 | Tristan Justice

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who is overseeing the ongoing illegitimate impeachment inquiry set in motion by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., is reportedly telling witnesses testifying not to answer questions asked by Republican lawmakers.

Speaking to reporters on Capitol Hill, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., slammed the hidden process claiming Schiff was instructing witnesses testifying behind the closed doors of the SCIF not to answer questions asked by Republican members.

“He’s directing witnesses not to answer questions that he doesn’t want the witness to answer if they’re asked by Republicans,” Scalise charged. “He’s not cut off one Democrat. He’s not interrupted one Democrat and told a witness not to answer Democrat members’ questions but today he started telling witnesses not to answer questions by certain Republicans.”

One question that Schiff barred a witness from answering reportedly came from Ohio Republican Congressman Jim Jordan who attempted to asked the initial anonymous “whistleblower” who they spoke with following the infamous July phone call between Trump and Ukrainian president.

“Adam Schiff says, ‘no-no-no we’re not going to let him answer that question,’” Jordan said as reported by Fox News.

The latest charges against Schiff come as the ongoing impeachment process has been rot with allegations of bias where Schiff has been conducting a closed-door investigation interviewing witnesses whose testimony has been selectively leaked to the press to frame the president.

The secrecy of the House proceedings followed by an array of leaked testimony to promote a false narrative being peddled by the corporate media prompted about 30 House Republicans led by Rep. Matt Gaetz, D-Fla., to storm the SCIF to demand previously denied records relating to the investigation.

Schiff is blocking GOP lawmakers from asking critical questions in the proceedings two days before Pelosi has set a tentative full-chamber vote to formalize the impeachment inquiry.

The text of the resolution was released Tuesday afternoon and denies Republicans subpoena powers. In both the Nixon and Clinton proceedings, the minority party was given this right.

-------------

WITNESS TAMPERING is no longer a CRIME? This sounds like a scenario right out of Mao's regime!!!!!
The Dems were going to bring impeachment when they took back the House--regardless of facts and indifferent to the good of the country. Don't waste time with keeping up with these kangaroo proceedings. When it gets to the Senate, "lock and load".

VDARE.com’s Peter Brimelow On Impeachment: Democrats Huff And Puff—YAWN! Wake Up When Senate Trial Begins. Then Lock And Load. | Articles
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Coaching a witness is prosecutorial misconduct, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. Not to mention that Schiff is a material witness as he coached the whistle blower and should be recused....

This is a full blown Coup D'etat...

Republicans are not allowed to call witnesses..
Republicans are not allowed to question or cross examine witnesses..
The accused is not allowed to have attorneys present nor allowed to question or cross examine witnesses..

THIS ISA FUCKING FULL BLOWN COUP.... Denial of ALL DUE PROCESS.. THEY ARE TREATING THIS LIKE THE SOVIET GULAG!
 
Last edited:
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.
Oh please, STFU

If Trump was doing something wrong
why didn't anyone tell him?

If there is nothing to Burisma then investigate

WHY ARE THESE PEOPLE STILL IN OFFICE?!
CONGRESS NEEDS TO FUCKING GO!
WTF, WHAT IS IT GOING TO TAKE PEOPLE?
People who tell tRuml he's wrong get fired.

The prosecutor was fired for NOT investigating Burisma.

Not a big fan of the constitution are you.

The prosecutor was fired because Joe Biden threatened Ukraine. Don't you watch the news?
Removing him was government policy and supported by other governments in Europe. They wanted him removed because he wasn't investigating things.

This is all out there, open your eyes.

What governments? Ukraine doesn't belong to the EU. The clip of Biden threatening Ukraine and bragging about it on TV has been posted a couple of times the past week.

That it has and the dumbass outed himself on National television. The lefty loons like to ignore that fact.

What a bunch of dumbasses.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.

Think about what you're saying in your reflexive attempt to defend the attacks on Trump at all costs. If this is correct, the question Schiff didn't want asked (and answered) likely would have led straight to him. He wasn't protecting the witness, he was protecting himself.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.

Think about what you're saying in your reflexive attempt to defend the attacks on Trump at all costs. If this is correct, the question Schiff didn't want asked (and answered) likely would have led straight to him. He wasn't protecting the witness, he was protecting himself.
Exactly and most call that obstruction.
 
It's not witness tampering, it's protecting the whistleblower. dOnald tRump has made death threats.

Think about what you're saying in your reflexive attempt to defend the attacks on Trump at all costs. If this is correct, the question Schiff didn't want asked (and answered) likely would have led straight to him. He wasn't protecting the witness, he was protecting himself.
Exactly and most call that obstruction.

They certainly would had Trump directed a witness to not answer a question.
 

Forum List

Back
Top