Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims

[hadit]

"Republicans are stepping up calls for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to resign or give up his committee post for repeatedly pushing claims of collusion between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives.

“He’s been on every TV show 50 times a day for practically the last two years, promising Americans that this president would either be impeached or indicted”

“He has no right, as somebody who has been peddling a lie, day after day after day, unchallenged. Unchallenged and not under oath. Somebody should have put him under oath and said, ‘You have evidence, where is it? He's saying there was evidence of collusion in plain sight, that he knew of it. If he's got evidence, put him under oath.”

For two years, Schiff routinely sounded ominous warnings about what Special Counsel Robert Mueller might find on Trump.

Despite Schiff’s claims, Mueller found no evidence of coordination or conspiracy involving Trump, his campaign and the Russian government, Attorney General William Barr wrote in a letter released on Sunday."


In addition to claiming he has clear evidence of Trump collusion and promising Americans for almost 2 years now the President would be indicted Schiff ADMITTED TO LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION in an attempt to aid in Mueller's investigation in hopes the President would be found 'Guilty' in Mueller's report. RATHER THAN LEADING THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, SCHIFF SHOULD BE INDICTED FOR LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION!


He owes an apology to the American public," House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said. “There is no place in Adam Schiff's world or in Congress that he should be chair of the intel committee. There is no way he could lead the intel committee and he should step back."

Despite the withering criticism from GOP leaders and the calls to step down, Schiff has remained defiant – repeating on Monday his assertion that evidence of collusion is in "plain sight."


The Democrats pressured US AG Sessions to recuse himself from the Trump investigation over something that had no impact on the investigation. Deputy US AG Rod Rosenstein, however, declared if there was any conflict of interest that impacted his involvement in the Trump investigation he would admit it and recuse himself. WHAT PROVEN BULLSHIT:
- Rosenstein recommended FBI Director Comey be fired, wrote the justification for the President to do so, and as soon as the President fired Comey it was Rosenstein that recommended Tremp be investigated for Obstruction for firing Comey.
- Rosenstein was one of the Obama Administration / DOJ members proven to have participated in withholding information / defrauding the FISA Court in an attempt to illegally acquire warrants to spy on Carter Paige.
- Comey, Mueller, and Rosenstein are extremely well-known friends.

Now you have an OBVIOUSLY BIASED Democrat who for 2 years has promised President Trump would be removed from office, the goal of the proven / exposed coup attempt, and he is now running the House Intel Committee which he promises to use to continue to investigate and bring down the President despite the Mueller report. THERE IS NO DOUBT SCHIFF, AGAIN - WHO ADMITTED TO ILLEGALLY LEAKING CLASSIFIED, SCHIFF CAN CONTINUE TO LEAD THE HOUSE INTEL COMMITTEE, ESPECIALLY IF CONTINUING TO INVESTIGATE THE PRESIDENT.

For leaking classified he should be Indicted, never to lead the House Intel Committee ever again at the least. For admittedly leaking classified Schiff should have his security clearance revoked!


Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims

.


OP's are to be 3-4 paragraphs, a link, and comment. easyt65

• Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

He has every right to his opinion. The fact is that the Mueller investigation has not answered several questions. Manafort receiving money from Russia and working for Trump who the Russians were trying to elect. The possibility he turned over polling data to a business associate who has ties to Russian intelligence. Russia bought social media ads in several states. Did that polling data help the Russians decide in which states to place those ads? Roger Stone claimed to have a backchannel to WikiLeaks and he knew the Podesta e-mails which were hacked by Russia would be on WikiLeaks before they were actually were. Assange has financial ties to Putin.

Man, if only Mueller would have asked you. He could have spent millions less and taken 5 minutes instead of two years. What makes you think the investigation didn't answer those questions? Perhaps you're just upset that the answer isn't what you wanted.

Mueller asked them all for their collected evidence. If he failed to produce it he is guilty of Criminal Obstruction of Justice..

Seriously, they're screeching that they have to see all of Mueller's report right now, but Schiff can claim all day long that he has some and not produce it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

"Republicans are stepping up calls for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff to resign or give up his committee post for repeatedly pushing claims of collusion between President Trump’s 2016 campaign and Russian operatives.

“He’s been on every TV show 50 times a day for practically the last two years, promising Americans that this president would either be impeached or indicted”

“He has no right, as somebody who has been peddling a lie, day after day after day, unchallenged. Unchallenged and not under oath. Somebody should have put him under oath and said, ‘You have evidence, where is it? He's saying there was evidence of collusion in plain sight, that he knew of it. If he's got evidence, put him under oath.”

For two years, Schiff routinely sounded ominous warnings about what Special Counsel Robert Mueller might find on Trump.

Despite Schiff’s claims, Mueller found no evidence of coordination or conspiracy involving Trump, his campaign and the Russian government, Attorney General William Barr wrote in a letter released on Sunday."


In addition to claiming he has clear evidence of Trump collusion and promising Americans for almost 2 years now the President would be indicted Schiff ADMITTED TO LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION in an attempt to aid in Mueller's investigation in hopes the President would be found 'Guilty' in Mueller's report. RATHER THAN LEADING THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, SCHIFF SHOULD BE INDICTED FOR LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION!


He owes an apology to the American public," House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said. “There is no place in Adam Schiff's world or in Congress that he should be chair of the intel committee. There is no way he could lead the intel committee and he should step back."

Despite the withering criticism from GOP leaders and the calls to step down, Schiff has remained defiant – repeating on Monday his assertion that evidence of collusion is in "plain sight."


The Democrats pressured US AG Sessions to recuse himself from the Trump investigation over something that had no impact on the investigation. Deputy US AG Rod Rosenstein, however, declared if there was any conflict of interest that impacted his involvement in the Trump investigation he would admit it and recuse himself. WHAT PROVEN BULLSHIT:
- Rosenstein recommended FBI Director Comey be fired, wrote the justification for the President to do so, and as soon as the President fired Comey it was Rosenstein that recommended Tremp be investigated for Obstruction for firing Comey.
- Rosenstein was one of the Obama Administration / DOJ members proven to have participated in withholding information / defrauding the FISA Court in an attempt to illegally acquire warrants to spy on Carter Paige.
- Comey, Mueller, and Rosenstein are extremely well-known friends.

Now you have an OBVIOUSLY BIASED Democrat who for 2 years has promised President Trump would be removed from office, the goal of the proven / exposed coup attempt, and he is now running the House Intel Committee which he promises to use to continue to investigate and bring down the President despite the Mueller report. THERE IS NO DOUBT SCHIFF, AGAIN - WHO ADMITTED TO ILLEGALLY LEAKING CLASSIFIED, SCHIFF CAN CONTINUE TO LEAD THE HOUSE INTEL COMMITTEE, ESPECIALLY IF CONTINUING TO INVESTIGATE THE PRESIDENT.

For leaking classified he should be Indicted, never to lead the House Intel Committee ever again at the least. For admittedly leaking classified Schiff should have his security clearance revoked!


Schiff faces mounting GOP calls for resignation over collusion claims

.


OP's are to be 3-4 paragraphs, a link, and comment. easyt65

• Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

He has every right to his opinion. The fact is that the Mueller investigation has not answered several questions. Manafort receiving money from Russia and working for Trump who the Russians were trying to elect. The possibility he turned over polling data to a business associate who has ties to Russian intelligence. Russia bought social media ads in several states. Did that polling data help the Russians decide in which states to place those ads? Roger Stone claimed to have a backchannel to WikiLeaks and he knew the Podesta e-mails which were hacked by Russia would be on WikiLeaks before they were actually were. Assange has financial ties to Putin.

Man, if only Mueller would have asked you. He could have spent millions less and taken 5 minutes instead of two years. What makes you think the investigation didn't answer those questions? Perhaps you're just upset that the answer isn't what you wanted.

Mueller asked them all for their collected evidence. If he failed to produce it he is guilty of Criminal Obstruction of Justice..

Seriously, they're screeching that they have to see all of Mueller's report right now, but Schiff can claim all day long that he has some and not produce it.

Schiff needs to put up or shut up.. The more the idiot talks the bigger fool he is exposing himself as.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Schiff's "response" was a bunch of ducking and dodging and avoiding the main issues mixed with a bunch of questionable and/or irrelevant accusations. I guess he's hoping against hope that Barr has grossly misrepresented Mueller's findings.

 

[Markle]

Ohhhh......you say he's lying because he says he has "proof" of something.....but he hasn't told you what it is yet, so he's lying.

Chairman Adam Schiff has said for two or more years that he had EVIDENCE of President Donald Trump in collusion with Russia. If he had evidence, didn't it behoove him to share that evidence with the Special Investigator? NOT doing so, wouldn't that be obstruction of justice? Another term would be spoliation of evidence. Both are crimes, are they not?

"The spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding."

If Adam Schiff really does have EVIDENCE of collusion by President Donald Trump, especially as Chairman of the INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, shouldn't he be arrested? Try to be honest. Shouldn't he be arrested? Not just step down from his chairmanship but be arrested?

 

[Markle]

During one of his rallies Trump called on the Russians to produce Hillarys emails because no one else seemed to be able too. And if you didn't understand that then you are stupid or a liar or both.

So what?

 

[Lakhota]

Adam Schiff will be on Rachel Maddow at 9:00 pm ET - 3 minutes from now...

 

[Care4all]

Ohhhh......you say he's lying because he says he has "proof" of something.....but he hasn't told you what it is yet, so he's lying.

Chairman Adam Schiff has said for two years that he had EVIDENCE of President Donald Trump in collusion with Russia. If he had evidence, didn't it behoove him to share that evidence with the Special Investigator? NOT doing so, wouldn't that be obstruction of justice? Another term would be spoliation of evidence. Both are crimes, are they not?

"The spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding."

If Adam Schiff really does have EVIDENCE of collusion by President Donald Trump, especially as Chairman of the INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, shouldn't he be arrested? Try to be honest. Shouldn't he be arrested? Not just step down from his chairmanship but be arrested?

Markle, that is silly as heck!

First, 'collusion' is not a crime. Trump and acolytes have been saying such for years...

Schiff spelled out what collusion took place in the hearing yesterday.... every single thing he mentioned, HAPPENED... maybe they are not a criminal conspiracy, but seemingly WRONG none the less... witting or unwittingly.

Right HERE are the things they did that are just shocking, and as said, we need to know what Mueller found out on them, and if he had determined why they did all of these things, whether criminal or not:

My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign. You might think that’s OK.

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the president’s son did not call the FBI; he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help – no, instead that son said that he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians.


“You might think it’s OK that he took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s OK that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think that’s OK.


“You might think it’s OK that when it was discovered, a year later, that they then lied about that meeting and said that it was about adoptions. You might think that it’s OK that it was reported that the president helped dictate that lie. You might think that’s OK. I don’t.


“You might think it’s OK that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might think that’s OK, I don’t.


“You might think it’s OK that that campaign chairman offered polling data to someone linked to Russian intelligence. I don’t think that’s OK.


“You might think it’s OK that the president himself called on Russia to hack his opponent’s emails, if they were listening. You might think it’s OK that later that day, in fact, the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign. I don’t think that’s OK.


“You might think it’s OK that the president’s son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communication with the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility. I don’t think that’s OK.


“You might think it’s OK that an associate of the president made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, that is considered a hostile intelligence agency. You might think it’s OK that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.


“You might think it’s OK that the national security adviser designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining U.S. sanctions, and you might think it’s OK that he lied about it to the FBI.


“You might say that’s all OK, that’s just what you need to do to win. But I don’t think it’s OK. I don’t think it’s OK. I think it’s immoral, I think it’s unethical, I think it’s unpatriotic and, yes, I think it’s corrupt – and evidence of collusion.”


“Now I have always said that the question of whether this amounts to proof of conspiracy was another matter. Whether the special counsel could prove beyond a reasonable doubt the proof of that crime would be up to the special counsel, and I would accept his decision, and I do. He’s a good and honorable man, and he is a good prosecutor.


“But I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is OK. And the day we do think that’s OK is the day we will look back and say that is the day that America lost its way.”
Under partisan fire, Adam Schiff presents his case without apology


WE ALL have a great public interest in knowing why all of these things occurred, why oh why oh why, did the Trump team, do all of those things that appear to be extremely, unethical and simply un-American, imo?

These are ALL THINGS known to the public through excellent reporting... they are not things Schiff released, these are knowns, not made up lies...

 

[skews13]

He should undergo an Ethics Investigation and then Expulsion from The House.
He then need prosecuted for leaking classified information.

Thats what is going to happen to Nunes, and several other Republicans in the House and Senate after all of the investigations are complete.

 

[Markle]

Keep calling everyone on the other side a white nationalist, that'll help the Dems in 2020.

I'd rather lose than having White Nationalists on MY side of the aisle....(as happened in the 2018 election)...LOL

Curious, so you prefer having the New Black Panthers, Black Lives Matter, Minister Louis Farrakhan, and others on your side of the aisle?

 

[Rustic]

Adam Schiff will be on Rachel Maddow at 9:00 pm ET - 3 minutes from now...

Washington redskin,
Neither pencil neck or Mad cow have any credibility

 

[Markle]

Ohhhh......you say he's lying because he says he has "proof" of something.....but he hasn't told you what it is yet, so he's lying.

Chairman Adam Schiff has said for two years that he had EVIDENCE of President Donald Trump in collusion with Russia. If he had evidence, didn't it behoove him to share that evidence with the Special Investigator? NOT doing so, wouldn't that be obstruction of justice? Another term would be spoliation of evidence. Both are crimes, are they not?

"The spoliation of evidence is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding."

If Adam Schiff really does have EVIDENCE of collusion by President Donald Trump, especially as Chairman of the INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE, shouldn't he be arrested? Try to be honest. Shouldn't he be arrested? Not just step down from his chairmanship but be arrested?

Markle, that is silly as heck!

First, 'collusion' is not a crime. Trump and acolytes have been saying such for years...

Schiff spelled out what collusion took place in the hearing yesterday.... every single thing he mentioned, HAPPENED... maybe they are not a criminal conspiracy, but seemingly WRONG none the less... witting or unwittingly.

Right HERE are the things they did that are just shocking, and as said, we need to know what Mueller found out on them, and if he had determined why they did all of these things, whether criminal or not:

My colleagues might think it’s OK that the Russians offered dirt on the Democratic candidate for president as part of what’s described as the Russian government’s effort to help the Trump campaign. You might think that’s OK.

“My colleagues might think it’s OK that when that was offered to the son of the president, who had a pivotal role in the campaign, that the president’s son did not call the FBI; he did not adamantly refuse that foreign help – no, instead that son said that he would ‘love’ the help with the Russians.

“You might think it’s OK that he took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that Paul Manafort, the campaign chair, someone with great experience running campaigns, also took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that the president’s son-in-law also took that meeting. You might think it’s OK that they concealed it from the public. You might think it’s OK that their only disappointment after that meeting was that the dirt they received on Hillary Clinton wasn’t better. You might think that’s OK.

“You might think it’s OK that when it was discovered, a year later, that they then lied about that meeting and said that it was about adoptions. You might think that it’s OK that it was reported that the president helped dictate that lie. You might think that’s OK. I don’t.

“You might think it’s OK that the campaign chairman of a presidential campaign would offer information about that campaign to a Russian oligarch in exchange for money or debt forgiveness. You might think that’s OK, I don’t.

“You might think it’s OK that that campaign chairman offered polling data to someone linked to Russian intelligence. I don’t think that’s OK.

“You might think it’s OK that the president himself called on Russia to hack his opponent’s emails, if they were listening. You might think it’s OK that later that day, in fact, the Russians attempted to hack a server affiliated with that campaign. I don’t think that’s OK.

“You might think it’s OK that the president’s son-in-law sought to establish a secret back channel of communication with the Russians through a Russian diplomatic facility. I don’t think that’s OK.


“You might think it’s OK that an associate of the president made direct contact with the GRU through Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks, that is considered a hostile intelligence agency. You might think it’s OK that a senior campaign official was instructed to reach that associate and find out what that hostile intelligence agency had to say in terms of dirt on his opponent.

“You might think it’s OK that the national security adviser designate secretly conferred with the Russian ambassador about undermining U.S. sanctions, and you might think it’s OK that he lied about it to the FBI.

“You might say that’s all OK, that’s just what you need to do to win. But I don’t think it’s OK. I don’t think it’s OK. I think it’s immoral, I think it’s unethical, I think it’s unpatriotic and, yes, I think it’s corrupt – and evidence of collusion.”

“Now I have always said that the question of whether this amounts to proof of conspiracy was another matter. Whether the special counsel could prove beyond a reasonable doubt the proof of that crime would be up to the special counsel, and I would accept his decision, and I do. He’s a good and honorable man, and he is a good prosecutor.

“But I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is OK. And the day we do think that’s OK is the day we will look back and say that is the day that America lost its way.”
Under partisan fire, Adam Schiff presents his case without apology

WE ALL have a great public interest in knowing why all of these things occurred, why oh why oh why, did the Trump team, do all of those things that appear to be extremely, unethical and simply un-American, imo?

These are ALL THINGS known to the public through excellent reporting... they are not things Schiff released, these are knowns, not made up lies...

Adam Schiff stated, several times that he had evidence of collusion.

Today, Chairman Adam Schiff knows he is in deep trouble and is spinning furiously to bail himself out.

Your desperation is duly noted!

 

[Markle]

USA TODAY exclusive: Hundreds allege Donald Trump doesn’t pay his bills

Again?

 

[Markle]

Seriously, what's he waiting for? We should see it all, right now.

Do you know what is involved in releasing the report?

 

[hadit]

Seriously, what's he waiting for? We should see it all, right now.

Do you know what is involved in releasing the report?

I'm talking about Schiff's supposed evidence.

 

[skews13]

Schiff's "response" was a bunch of ducking and dodging and avoiding the main issues mixed with a bunch of questionable and/or irrelevant accusations. I guess he's hoping against hope that Barr has grossly misrepresented Mueller's findings.

Schiff is a the chairman of the intelligence committee.

He’s the one asking the questions.

Everybody else are the ones answering them. And lying to the committee is a felony.

After that hearing, everybody that now comes in front of Schiff better tread lightly, and be very careful about what comes out of their pie holes.

 

[MarathonMike]

Schiff's "response" was a bunch of ducking and dodging and avoiding the main issues mixed with a bunch of questionable and/or irrelevant accusations. I guess he's hoping against hope that Barr has grossly misrepresented Mueller's findings.

Schiff is a the chairman of the intelligence committee.

He’s the one asking the questions.

Everybody else are the ones answering them. And lying to the committee is a felony.

After that hearing, everybody that now comes in front of Schiff better tread lightly, and be very careful about what comes out of their pie holes.

Fuck Adam Schiff he is a total partisan hack with ZERO objectivity. He has no business being the head of the intelligence committee or anything else.

 

[busybee01]

He should undergo an Ethics Investigation and then Expulsion from The House.

Sorry....but we don't (or at least shouldn't) take the advice of you Russian trolls, Comrade.

The only trolls we know of, who have sold their souls to pootin, are you and yours, cupcake. You assholes have done more real damage to this country than that fucker ever could.

Think about it.....the whole entire charade was based on Russian Propaganda Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama paid Putin for, and then used that to smear Trump with for 3 years straight!

So who is bought and paid for by Putin? The Democrat Party, and all of their supporters who went right along with it in lock step DemNazi fashion.

You are exactly who the statement was meant for and it still stands.
Take it in stride , once again you prove you are a tRump swallower and snowflake.

You F*CKING snowflakes are all alike.

If you are referring to me, then my apologies for proving so thoroughly that D-Adam Schiff is, like many Trump-haters have proven to be, a criminal - an admitted classified information - obsessed with treasonously affecting a coup, ousting the President of the United States, no matter what it takes.

The fact that you are whining about my post, because it so thoroughly proved that fact, only proves who the real easily offended snowflakes are.



Again, my apologies for any errs on my part.

Take heart, snowflake, the sting and humiliation of Mueller's report will only last as long as you continue to deny it and cling to the now disproven claims of non-existent Trump collusion....which unfortunately for you means you are going to feel this for a VERY long time.

The Mueller report did find evidence of collusion just not beyond a reasonable doubt. I suspect that Democrats are going to have plenty to talk about. It is a sad day when a President CANNOT be exonerated from conspiring with a foreign power to win a election.

 

[Thinker101]

He should undergo an Ethics Investigation and then Expulsion from The House.

Sorry....but we don't (or at least shouldn't) take the advice of you Russian trolls, Comrade.

The only trolls we know of, who have sold their souls to pootin, are you and yours, cupcake. You assholes have done more real damage to this country than that fucker ever could.

Think about it.....the whole entire charade was based on Russian Propaganda Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama paid Putin for, and then used that to smear Trump with for 3 years straight!

So who is bought and paid for by Putin? The Democrat Party, and all of their supporters who went right along with it in lock step DemNazi fashion.

You are exactly who the statement was meant for and it still stands.
Take it in stride , once again you prove you are a tRump swallower and snowflake.

You F*CKING snowflakes are all alike.

If you are referring to me, then my apologies for proving so thoroughly that D-Adam Schiff is, like many Trump-haters have proven to be, a criminal - an admitted classified information - obsessed with treasonously affecting a coup, ousting the President of the United States, no matter what it takes.

The fact that you are whining about my post, because it so thoroughly proved that fact, only proves who the real easily offended snowflakes are.



Again, my apologies for any errs on my part.

Take heart, snowflake, the sting and humiliation of Mueller's report will only last as long as you continue to deny it and cling to the now disproven claims of non-existent Trump collusion....which unfortunately for you means you are going to feel this for a VERY long time.

The Mueller report did find evidence of collusion just not beyond a reasonable doubt. I suspect that Democrats are going to have plenty to talk about. It is a sad day when a President CANNOT be exonerated from conspiring with a foreign power to win a election.

No kidding, you got a copy of the Mueller report?

 

[busybee01]

Schiff's "response" was a bunch of ducking and dodging and avoiding the main issues mixed with a bunch of questionable and/or irrelevant accusations. I guess he's hoping against hope that Barr has grossly misrepresented Mueller's findings.

Schiff is a the chairman of the intelligence committee.

He’s the one asking the questions.

Everybody else are the ones answering them. And lying to the committee is a felony.

After that hearing, everybody that now comes in front of Schiff better tread lightly, and be very careful about what comes out of their pie holes.

Fuck Adam Schiff he is a total partisan hack with ZERO objectivity. He has no business being the head of the intelligence committee or anything else.

Like Devin Nunes was bi-partisan not. He had no business heading the Intelligence Committee.

 

[busybee01]

proven to have participated in withholding information
Who proved Rosenberg did any such thing and what happened to him for it?

The 'Stupid' game again? I would think you would have gotten tired of getting your delusional, traitor-defending ass kicked in public by now...

FISA Memo Released and Fraud on the FISA Court Revealed | American Center for Law and Justice

Rod Rosenstein’s Subpoena Threat: Shows Conflict of Interest | National Review

Memo claims Rosenstein approved application to extend surveillance of Carter Page: report

"Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosensteinapproved an application last year to extend surveillance of former Trump campaign associate Carter Page, according to a secret Republican memo detailed in a The New York Times report.

According to the Times, which cited three people familiar with the memo, the FBI and Justice Department's application was based partially on research by investigator Christopher Steele, who compiled a dossier containing unverified claims about ties to Russia.

The GOP memo alleges officials did not sufficiently explain their reasoning for extending the surveillance, it added."

Rosenstein signed off on the FISA Warrant application requests that illegally withheld the information that the warrants were in part based on the Trump Dossier BOUGHT BY DNC CANDIDATE HILLARY CLINTON, that the information was confirmed 'UNRELIABLE'/'Unsubstantiated' (DOJ Ohr testimony), and the information from the Dossier was presented as 'legitimate Intel', which the conspirators - to include Rosenstein - knew to be false!

Sounds like you are acting as judge and jury here. I don't recall him being fired or arrested for doing anything illegal. As a matter of fact, he was just now in consultation with Barr to determine that Trump could not be charged with obstruction of justice. A lot of the information in the Steele dossier so far has been confirmed, but a lot of it hasn't. None of it has been actually proven false.

The Steele Dossier = Horsecrap.

Just saying so doesn't make it true.

More on The Steele Dossier = 100% HORSECRAP, this time from The Wall Street Journal and now ONLY TOTAL nuts think that ANYTHING in The Steele Dossier is worth ANYTHING more than using as bird cage liner:

Accountability for a Dossier

The dirty trick that started the collusion fable needs exposing.

By The Editorial Board

March 25, 2019 7:05 p.m. ET


"Special Counsel Robert Mueller has dispatched the Russia collusion theories to the land of cranks and bitter-enders, but there are still some loose ends. To wit, how did the partisan propaganda known as the Steele dossier become the basis for an unprecedented FBI probe of a presidential campaign, an abuse of law enforcement, and two years of media and political hysteria?"

Opinion | Accountability for a Dossier

Sad to say that Trump supporters apparently cannot read. The Mueller report states that Trump was not exonerated. For Mueller to make a statement like that, he clearly found some evidence of collusion.