Schumer Threatens USSC Justices Gorsuch & Kavanaugh: 'You Will Pay Price - Won't Know What Hit You!

[Hellokitty]

Schumer was speaking on the senate floor and said he shouldn't have made the comments giving the excuse of being from Brooklyn stopping short of giving an apology. McConnell needs to go through with censor and make an example of Schumer because this is not the 1st time an elected democrat engaged in political threats and if Schumer is allowed to get away with this it will only continue.

Republicans continue to look weak by allowing this behavior from democrats. Republicans did nothing to any of the democrats who engaged in forms of protest during the SOTU address. Republicans will loss in 2020 if they don't start fighting back against democrats.

 

[SAYIT]

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.

Go run away you feckless coward.

He is scared of the truth.

Or as Nicholson would say, "they just can't handle the truth."

 

[Dick Foster]

BREAKING: Senator To Bring Motion To Censure Schumer, Democrat Suggests He Step Down

As he should be censured.

Bravo!

Why should he be censored?

Why shouldn't he, shitforbrains? He sure as hell qualified for it with that behavior.

 

[SAYIT]

Schummer should be censured and forced to resign. He is criminally insane.

Censure requires a simple majority but removal requires a 2/3 super majority to pull off. I'd be happy with censure and if the republicans in the senate had any balls, they'd do it PDQ. Enough of this kinda shit already. And after the election and the demodummies are in the minority again they should start in on them. Pelosi, schiff and Nadler if they're still rather for starters then proceed on with what squad members remain. Note censure removes the censured congressman from all committees effectively cutting their balls off and restricts them to floor votes only. Not sure but if they hold a leadership role ie Pelosi or Schumer, censure may remove that too.

I'll be much happier if they behead him and place it on a spike on Cap Hill.

 

[ColonelAngus]

NEWSWEEK is DImm party propaganda.

 

[Rye Catcher]

What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the same
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?

This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.

when has Trump threatened a judge?

AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

They should not be impeached, what will happen is a Million Women March, with a large number of men joining them to picket the Court in cities all across America. R v. W will remain the law, and if the GOP succeeds in removing it they will not only lose elections, the party itself will go the way of the Whigs, for they will lose their favorite wedge issue.

However, the bill itself is nothing more than harming poor women, who can't afford to travel outside of the state of Louisiana, which makes this effort despicable.

 

[Oldstyle]

Just 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.

Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.

Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.

What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the same
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?

This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.

He did actually. You of course missed it!

 

[SAYIT]

Schumer was speaking on the senate floor and said he shouldn't have made the comments giving the excuse of being from Brooklyn stopping short of giving an apology...

So there's something mentally & emotionally wrong with him because he comes from Brooklyn?

What kind of excuse for being STUPID is that?

 

[Dick Foster]

"Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) threatened two conservative Supreme Court justices as he spoke at a pro-choice rally in front of the Supreme Court Wednesday as the Court heard a Louisiana case on restricting abortion, June Medical Services v. Russo, described by ScotusBlog, “Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s decision upholding Louisiana’s law requiring physicians who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital conflicts with the Supreme Court’s binding precedent in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.”

Schumer turned and pointed at the Supreme Court building behind him and menacingly screamed as he shook his fist:

“I want to tell you Gorsuch! And I want to tell you Kavanaugh! You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price! You won’t know what hit you! If you go forward with these awful decisions…”

Seeing as how Senate Minority Leader Schumer can not do anything to Judicial Branch USSC Justices via Congress, this sure sounds like a physical threat to me...

( I see Democrats have learned nothing since their violent rhetoric triggered a dangerous liberal extremist snowflake into gunning down R-Scalise)



Schumer Threatens Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, "You Will Pay the Price! You Won't Know What Hit You!" (Video)"

.

Ok here is the difference....I heard and saw many democrats that not only disagreed with Schumer but also denounced him.....the orange clown has been attacking judges, kids, minorities, everyone that tweets against him and his minions all they do is cheer.

Listen stupid I know you're feeble minded but there's a hell of a difference between disagreeing with or even mocking and threatening. Now get a clue or get out will ya.

 

[Mac-7]

Schumer was speaking on the senate floor and said he shouldn't have made the comments giving the excuse of being from Brooklyn stopping short of giving an apology. McConnell needs to go through with censor and make an example of Schumer because this is not the 1st time an elected democrat engaged in political threats and if Schumer is allowed to get away with this it will only continue.

Republicans continue to look weak by allowing this behavior from democrats. Republicans did nothing to any of the democrats who engaged in forms of protest during the SOTU address. Republicans will loss in 2020 if they don't start fighting back against democrats.

Schumer was speaking on the senate floor and said he shouldn't have made the comments

That should be schumers last speech in the senate

 

[BlindBoo]

Newsweek is wrong. by blocking Obama's nomination and by lowering the standard to allow a 50% + 1 majority to confirm a SC justice, the Senate already destroyed that notion.

Doncha hate when stupid Dem policies come back to bite them in the buttocks?

Nuclear option - Wikipedia
In November 2013, Senate Democrats led by Harry Reid (D, NV) used the nuclear option to eliminate the 60-vote rule on executive branch nominations...

You've been told a lie if you believe Reid did that. Reid changed the rules that effected the lower court judge process. That didn't include SC nominees. Mitch dropped that nuke.

 

[Hellokitty]

when has Trump threatened a judge?

AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

They should not be impeached, what will happen is a Million Women March, with a large number of men joining them to picket the Court in cities all across America. R v. W will remain the law, and if the GOP succeeds in removing it they will not only lose elections, the party itself will go the way of the Whigs, for they will lose their favorite wedge issue.

However, the bill itself is nothing more than harming poor women, who can't afford to travel outside of the state of Louisiana, which makes this effort despicable.

The left is so screwed up with the cult of identity, abortion is no longer just a woman issue since men can be women.

 

[SAYIT]

Newsweek is wrong. by blocking Obama's nomination and by lowering the standard to allow a 50% + 1 majority to confirm a SC justice, the Senate already destroyed that notion.

Doncha hate when stupid Dem policies come back to bite them in the buttocks?

Nuclear option - Wikipedia
In November 2013, Senate Democrats led by Harry Reid (D, NV) used the nuclear option to eliminate the 60-vote rule on executive branch nominations...

You've been told a lie if you believe Reid did that. Reid changed the rules that effected the lower court judge process. That didn't include SC nominees. Mitch dropped that nuke.

Even you must know that once you break the seal you'll be making return b-room visits often. Reid put the Senate on the path when he busted the super-majority Senate rule.

 

[martybegan]

when has Trump threatened a judge?

AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

They should not be impeached, what will happen is a Million Women March, with a large number of men joining them to picket the Court in cities all across America. R v. W will remain the law, and if the GOP succeeds in removing it they will not only lose elections, the party itself will go the way of the Whigs, for they will lose their favorite wedge issue.

However, the bill itself is nothing more than harming poor women, who can't afford to travel outside of the state of Louisiana, which makes this effort despicable.

You mean a million progressive women march. The progressive desire to claim whole groups as "one of us" is annoying as hell.

How is asking a doctor to have admitting privileges at a hospital if he performs abortions harming poor women? There are no hospitals in Louisiana?

 

[iceberg]

when has Trump threatened a judge?

AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.

given your lack of senses, how would you know?

 

[Fang]

Just 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.

Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.

Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.

That was a clear physical threat by Schumer. The "notion is judicial independence" is irrelevant. The SCOTUS has the right to look out for their own safety in the face of violent threats.

 

[bendog]

when has Trump threatened a judge?

AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

They should not be impeached, what will happen is a Million Women March, with a large number of men joining them to picket the Court in cities all across America. R v. W will remain the law, and if the GOP succeeds in removing it they will not only lose elections, the party itself will go the way of the Whigs, for they will lose their favorite wedge issue.

However, the bill itself is nothing more than harming poor women, who can't afford to travel outside of the state of Louisiana, which makes this effort despicable.

Despite the Anti-abortionists' pathetic attempts to portray Schumer as Preston Brooks, I don't see how politicians from the bible belt will suffer in elections. Lousiana's law is nearly identical to Miss's and there's nothing better for a theorcrat politician down here that "protecting unborn babies."

That's what makes the four Catholics and Gorsuch's likely outcome despicable. If a woman has a right to control her own body by having an abortion before viability, the SC is intentionally acting to deprive women their const rights. That's Schumer's point. There WILL be consequences.

 

[The Original Tree]

Maybe Schummer is now possessed of Satan. He kind of looks like a serpent.

 

[Dick Foster]

Schummer should be censured and forced to resign. He is criminally insane.

Censure requires a simple majority but removal requires a 2/3 super majority to pull off. I'd be happy with censure and if the republicans in the senate had any balls, they'd do it PDQ. Enough of this kinda shit already. And after the election and the demodummies are in the minority again they should start in on them. Pelosi, schiff and Nadler if they're still rather for starters then proceed on with what squad members remain. Note censure removes the censured congressman from all committees effectively cutting their balls off and restricts them to floor votes only. Not sure but if they hold a leadership role ie Pelosi or Schumer, censure may remove that too.

I'll be much happier if they behead him and place it on a spike on Cap Hill.

Ahhh my personal very favorite way to dispose of errant politicians, the guillotine! We should bring it back and install one permanently in the middle of the capital steps so they can see it every day and be reminded.

 

[The Original Tree]

Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though

It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.

Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:

But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL

He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.

Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?

They should not be impeached, what will happen is a Million Women March, with a large number of men joining them to picket the Court in cities all across America. R v. W will remain the law, and if the GOP succeeds in removing it they will not only lose elections, the party itself will go the way of the Whigs, for they will lose their favorite wedge issue.

However, the bill itself is nothing more than harming poor women, who can't afford to travel outside of the state of Louisiana, which makes this effort despicable.

Despite the Anti-abortionists' pathetic attempts to portray Schumer as Preston Brooks, I don't see how politicians from the bible belt will suffer in elections. Lousiana's law is nearly identical to Miss's and there's nothing better for a theorcrat politician down here that "protecting unborn babies."

That's what makes the four Catholics and Gorsuch's likely outcome despicable. If a woman has a right to control her own body by having an abortion before viability, the SC is intentionally acting to deprive women their const rights. That's Schumer's point. There WILL be consequences.

Thou Shalt Not Murder.