Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the same
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.
Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?
Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.
Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?
For as long as I can remember liberals were getting their way in the courts and demanded that supreme court rulings were infallible and must never be questionedWhat Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
yea, and gets whiney as shit when you call him on it as he dives into denial.Slade has a bad case of the partisanship at which he rails.when has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
"Don't do as I do … do as I say!"
Demoncraps are the senseless ones.Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.
Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?
So you would play STUPID identity politics with USSC nominees? Would you do the same when in need of surgery?Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He is scared of the truth.Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.
Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?
Go run away you feckless coward.
What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
Trump has never threatened a judge, dummy.
I'm having a bad day, pick your poisonTo clarify, who exactly are you talking to?You red white and vomit trash cans got us all out here shaking in our boots.....can't wait to see what urban nursing home your gonna shoot up.....LOLOLOLOLO cowardly bastards the lot of youEasy you keep posting BS you're gonna pay a price,,,lol
YOU THREATENING ME, YOU POS?! Bring it, you candy-assed, lying. TDS-suffering snowflake! I'll do a lot more than 'CENSURE' you in my self-defense.
Censure requires a simple majority but removal requires a 2/3 super majority to pull off. I'd be happy with censure and if the republicans in the senate had any balls, they'd do it PDQ. Enough of this kinda shit already. And after the election and the demodummies are in the minority again they should start in on them. Pelosi, Schiff and Nadler if they're still rather for starters then proceed on with what squad members remain. Note censure removes the censured congressman from all committees effectively cutting their balls off and restricts them to floor votes only. Not sure but if they hold a leadership role ie Pelosi or Schumer, censure may remove that too.Schummer should be censured and forced to resign. He is criminally insane.
Now this is some shit, Mitch who has giving his girlfriend Trump passes since taking the WH, is now a champion on proper behavior? MItch the BItch Please!!
SHAMING SCHUMER
McConnell calls out top Dem on Senate floor over shocking threats against SCOTUS justices
- -17:0-40WATCH: McConnell calls out Schumer on Senate floor for controversial Supreme Court remarks
- Judge Napolitano: Schumer's threat toward Supreme Court justices 'very dangerous'
- Jordan, Meadows blast Schumer for SCOTUS comments: 'The American people won't stand for it'
- Trump rebukes Schumer over threat to Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
- Chief Justice Roberts issues rare rebuke to Schumer's 'dangerous' comments; Trump slams lawmaker
- 1:51Sen. Cruz: Schumer directly threatened Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh
“There is nothing to call this except a threat”
Schumer didn't just step in a pile of schit...he jumped head-long into a giant pile of it.....
McConnell slams Schumer on Senate floor for controversial remarks directed at Supreme Court justices
Doncha hate when stupid Dem policies come back to bite them in the buttocks?Newsweek is wrong. by blocking Obama's nomination and by lowering the standard to allow a 50% + 1 majority to confirm a SC justice, the Senate already destroyed that notion.
Where do you think the term "brain-dead" originated?Demoncraps are the senseless ones.Bye Marty. I'll check in someday to see if you're recovered your senses.Marty, you're being pissy today. You know Schumer wouldn't physically threaten anyone. Even McConnell is above that (-:Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, though
It didn't have to be a physical threat, he implied consequences to them personally if they decided the "wrong" way. Be it impeachment, civil suit, protesting, or censure, Schumer threatened some action against them based on how he thinks they will decide on the LA abortion case.
But an impeachment or stacking the Court are possibilities. And prior to Gorsuch, the last time a non-Catholic Justice was nominated it was David Souter. And before that it was O'Connor. That's not random selection process. LOL
He threatened them. Trump didn't threaten the other two, he called them out.
Do you really think K or G should be impeached if they rule in favor of louisiana?
Now this is some shit, Mitch who has giving his girlfriend Trump passes since taking the WH, is now a champion on proper behavior? MItch the BItch Please!!
.... Hope it gets better.
