Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
Well my main objection to Trump has always been, what will happen if a dem does it?
Then why can a state eliminate a woman's right to first timester abortion with a regulation but the state cannot mandate an insurance policy cover IUDs.Already supported it, sonny. Go play with trump's penisKavenaugh Thomas and Alito all form their opinions on Roe by virtue of their religion. I mean why would they find a religious exemption to people getting FREE HC via an employer as a basis to challenge covering IUDs. Or employers complaining that the govt mandates all HC plans cover them? If THAT's a right, how come abortion is a right that State's can pass laws making them unattainable unless docs have admitting privileges to hospitals that will NEVER grant the privilege to a doc who openly performs abortions?SC justices don't "vote," as I'm sure you know. I think ALL of them, including Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, call 'em as they see 'em and do their best to keep their opinions out of it. That's their job.I do think he's out of place telling a SCOTUS how to vote "or else"
I'd be mad regardless of who did it as it's a continued sign our division of powers continues to fade.
I just think the reaction here is the typical "let's punish the lefties" attitude that comes at every opportunity. No sensible person would consider what he said as a viable threat. No one.
Kavenaugh Thomas and Alito all form their opinions on Roe by virtue of their religion.
You have absolutely nothing to back up that moronic claim.
You haven't supported jack shit.
What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
Then why can a state eliminate a woman's right to first timester abortion with a regulation but the state cannot mandate an insurance policy cover IUDs.Already supported it, sonny. Go play with trump's penisKavenaugh Thomas and Alito all form their opinions on Roe by virtue of their religion. I mean why would they find a religious exemption to people getting FREE HC via an employer as a basis to challenge covering IUDs. Or employers complaining that the govt mandates all HC plans cover them? If THAT's a right, how come abortion is a right that State's can pass laws making them unattainable unless docs have admitting privileges to hospitals that will NEVER grant the privilege to a doc who openly performs abortions?SC justices don't "vote," as I'm sure you know. I think ALL of them, including Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, call 'em as they see 'em and do their best to keep their opinions out of it. That's their job.
I just think the reaction here is the typical "let's punish the lefties" attitude that comes at every opportunity. No sensible person would consider what he said as a viable threat. No one.
Kavenaugh Thomas and Alito all form their opinions on Roe by virtue of their religion.
You have absolutely nothing to back up that moronic claim.
You haven't supported jack shit.
That's because you are a parroting retard....this sure sounds like a physical threat to me...
You're arguing a matter of protecting life (and the argument of when life starts) versus mandating tax payers pay for contraceptives (in a way)...'slightly' different arguments there....IMO....Then why can a state eliminate a woman's right to first timester abortion with a regulation but the state cannot mandate an insurance policy cover IUDs.
when has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
What's wrong with Schumer always threatening people?
What sort of person is this POS?
Is he that weak? is he so coward??
yes he is
I despise the man!
What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
prepare for shit to dovetail to end up being he gives one side leeway but not the other.What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
Well you managed to quote Schumer's threat... Why can't you quote Trump's threat?
Jo
so you can BS on alone?Stop with the bs. Schumer's an ass but he's never threatened physical violence. I appreciate you're acknowledging Trump's been out of bounds too, thoughwhen has Trump threatened a judge?What Chuck did was wrong. Just because Trump does that shit on a regular basis does not make it ok for other leader to follow suit. Roberts had a good point in his critique of Schumer but why hasn’t he made the sameJust 10 days ago there was a furor over Trump asserting that Justices Sotomayor and Ginsberg should recuse themselves in cases involving his admin because their statements about him expose their blatant bias. The POTUS threatened no one and merely pointed to their words as proof of their duty to recuse.
Yesterday Chuckie Shu - the Senate Jester - stood on the steps of the USSC and threatened 2 justices by name. The media reaction? Newsweek just castigated Chief Justice Roberts for having the temerity to call out Chuckie the Clown.
Chuck Schumer being reprimanded by Chief Justice Roberts "hurts the notion of judicial independence," say legal experts
Supreme Court Justice John Roberts' rebuke of Chuck Schumer over remarks he made at an abortion rights rally risked hurting "the notion of judicial independence" and "public faith" in America's top court, two senior lawyers have said.
condemnations of Trumps attacks on judges?
This partisanship is getting to destructive levels and needs to stop.
AND we seem to be OK with "whataboutism" again. funny how that works.
Easy you keep posting BS you're gonna pay a price,,,lolI laugh at you candy assed republicans while you have the most despicable pos ever in the WH now
Of course you laugh and try to make excuses for violent, pathetic Democrats....after Hillary's campaign was caught paying thugs to beat and bloody Trump supporters AT Trump rallies....after Democrats urged their violent sheep to stalk, get in the faces of, and attack Republican politicians in public...after their escalation in violent rhetoric resulted in the attempted assassination of Republican politicians and Scalise and others being shot....because you are a vile, deranged, partisan, easily emotionally-manipulated, hate-driven, TDS-suffering sheep.
'The Most Despicable POS even in the WH'? You have no idea how you sound just as insane as Pelosi, who just declared President Trump to be the 'most dangerous American in the history of the United States'.
The fact is that your 'Messiah', Barry, violated both Constitution and Law - was found in Contempt of Court numerous times for violating multiple Judges' orders, found by the USSC to have violated the Constitution several times, admittedly violated the Constitution numerous times..... He Un-Constitutionally and illegally spied on US citizens, reporters, the media, US SENATORS, and even USSC Justices....and initiated a failed political coup - the largest scandal in US history. He armed, supplied, financed, aided, abetted,protected, and defended terrorists, Mexican Drug Cartels, and enemies of the state. The 'Nobel Peace Prize Winner' pimped out the US military to Al Qeada to help them murder a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the Coalition fight terrorists in Northern Africa and take over that nation for their own, and dragged the US into a war by invading another sovereign nation without the permission or request by that nations government or leader - a UN recognized International War Crime...and when he left office he left US soldiers still in Syria to fight HIS war.
You are a lying, talking points-parroting, propaganda-spreading snowflake who seeks to do exactly what Schumer tried to do after he incited violence against Gorsuch and Kavanaugh - attempted to blame the President.
It is, in part, dumbass snowflakes like you, that Schumer needs to be made an example of by being Sanctioned / punished by the BAR, Censured by Senate, and pulled aside and questioned by the DOJ and/or Secret Service.
