Science Proves the Bible Again

[james bond]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

 

[bripat9643]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

 

[progressive hunter]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

 

[bripat9643]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

 

[progressive hunter]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

 

[bripat9643]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

So who/what created God?

 

[progressive hunter]

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

 

[bripat9643]

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

It's your theory. If you don't know, how can you claim it's true?

 

[progressive hunter]

NO logic doesnt indicate that

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

It's your theory. If you don't know, how can you claim it's true?

when did I claim fact??? its always been a theory just like evolution

just one problem,,

only one is taught as fact in public schools using tax payer money

 

[james bond]

More evidence for God. Science backs up the Bible regarding porn use.

"The Bible tells us, in 1 Corinthians 6:18, that sexual sin has negative physical consequences:

Escape from sexual immorality. Every sin that a man commits is outside the body. But he who commits sexual immorality sins against his own body. (MEV)

Now, science has confirmed what God’s word has established.

Regardless of the type of sexual sin—premarital sex, adultery, or viewing pornography—it alters how the human brain functions. Indulged in repeatedly, one’s conscience is seared, a physical change in the brain that numbs one to the guilt and conviction of his or her wrongdoing.

MORE POWERFUL THAN MORPHINE

The producers of the Conquer Series—a cinematic DVD series that helps men break free from pornography— note that when porn is viewed, powerful hormones are released, including:

• oxytocin—called “the love hormone,” it is typically released when one is hugged or kissed, regulating social interactions, sexual reproduction, and human bonding.
• vasopressin—used as medication, it numbs pain.

This concoction of hormones rewires the brain, giving it the wrong material, luring one deeper into a prison of his or her own making. It’s intoxicating, intended to bring loved ones closer and promote mental healing, but instead having the opposite effect and confusing the mind.

Conquer Series expert contributor Heart to Heart Counseling Center Executive Director Dr. Doug Weiss said:

When [you] have a sexual experience, your brains makes these opiates which [are] four times stronger than morphine. Boom! It hits your brain, your brain lights up like a Christmas tree. This is the highest chemical reward your brain gets for anything. That’s why a lot of guys get in trouble, even in ministry. They don’t know their brain is defective.

This way, sexual sin takes a profound toll on the brain, and the rest of the body. The sinner knows watching porn is a shameful act that must be kept secret, yet each time one views it, he or she “trusts” it more as a result of the pairing and deep mental bond forged by the hormones."

TruNews with Rick Wiles, Real News, Latest News, Christian News

An Introduction to Biblical Nonsense

People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

I have reviewed and found the atheists seem to back Satan and Satan backs them. For example, no more God because atheist science says so. The facts are science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists, i.e. people who believed in God and that he made the universe and everything in it. I can only conclude that you are looney or a bad person to believe in lies of Satan. I have been providing much evidence throughout my posts. One is we found that the chicken came before the egg in 2017 to put egg on the faces of secular scientists who believed the egg came first. These people just cannot accept true science because of they believe in false or fake science. You embarrass yourself in every post, so I will stop replying to you once more.

Just read my previous posts here and you have nothing, while I have provided observable, testable and falsifiable evidence.

 

[james bond]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

You're just making assertions as usual. Intelligent design is from the Discovery Institute and has nothing to do with creation science.. Creation science is based on the Bible and theories derived from it. You do not even know the difference.

First cause was not debunked ever or else nothing could begin to exist because it would have to have a cause. God does not have a cause because he is timeless, spaceless, immaterial and is uncaused. Secular scientists believed in something eternal such as the universe, i.e. uncaused, decades ago but were proven wrong. Thus, you are wrong once more. You just can't figure things out for yourself bripat9643 .

Show me where your definition of "spiritual" is. You are once more talking out of your rear end.

 

[bripat9643]

Hahaha...did you get all that, people? Let me review:

When you believe the entire scientific community and all the evidence ever collected over the insane ramblings of a person with nothing but iron aged fairy tales in tow, that is your "Satan filter", causing you to be evil.

And now you understand why I put nauseating little frauds like Bond on the same shelf with voodoo shamans, snake oil salesmen, and one eyed gypsies willing to teach you tomorrow's lottery numbers. He's a fucking freak just as much as any charlatan that has ever lived. He doesn't get cover just because he is cloaking his freakishness in a major religion .

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim, but the secular or atheist science community. Thus, you are wrong again. The secular, i.e. atheist scientists, eliminated their competition -- creation scientists. Otherwise, we would believe that God created the universe and what is in it as part of scientific theory.

The evidence is that universe and everything in it is here, so there has to be a cause. The cause started with space and time when there was no spacetime. Thus, the cause has to be spaceless and timeless and exist outside our physical world. The cause cannot be physical because it does not exist in our world, so it has to be spiritual. Not only that, the spiritual being has to be all powerful and have intelligence in order to create our universe that works the way it does and contains all the stars, moons and planets that continues to expand what seems like infinity as space and time stretches out. We will die before we find out the end because our lifetimes has already been laid out.

The fact is that many scientists who are Christians reject so-called "creation science" and the theory of intelligent design, so your claim is false.

Your first cause argument was debunked hundreds of years ago. If everything has a cause, then God has to have a cause. Creationists can't get around that.

The term "spiritual" means that it isn't subject to scientific examination. That means it can't be proven or disproven. However, logic indicates it's a false claim.

You're just making assertions as usual. Intelligent design is from the Discovery Institute and has nothing to do with creation science.. Creation science is based on the Bible and theories derived from it. You do not even know the difference.

First cause was not debunked ever or else nothing could begin to exist because it would have to have a cause. God does not have a cause because he is timeless, spaceless, immaterial and is uncaused. Secular scientists believed in something eternal such as the universe, i.e. uncaused, decades ago but were proven wrong. Thus, you are wrong once more. You just can't figure things out for yourself bripat9643 .

Show me where your definition of "spiritual" is.

Intelligent design is based on the Bible. You make that obvious because you start quoting the Bible whenever anyone ridicules your theories.

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim,

Wrong. It is the entire scientific community. It's an accepted fact. That is why none 9f your fake "creation scientists" are actual scientists . Just shut up you little weasel....and don't forget to declare victory over the entire scientific community on your way out the door...go to church, where you belong, and stay out of the science topics.

 

[progressive hunter]

The truth is it isn't the ENTIRE scientific community as you claim,

Wrong. It is the entire scientific community. It's an accepted fact. That is why none 9f your fake "creation scientists" are actual scientists . Just shut up you little weasel....and don't forget to declare victory over the entire scientific community on your way out the door...go to church, where you belong, and stay out of the science topics.

TROLL

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

Exactly. These frauds have an adorable little game rigged for themselves. You have to come up with a cause for everything, but they don't. You have to produce evidence, but they don't. You have to explain how animals appeared and disappeared throughout history, but they don't. You have to explain radiometric dating in excruciating detail, dealing with all manner of horseshit talking points. But they are allowed to assert, without good evidence argument, that their zombie King is real and sits at the right hand of Yahweh. And , if you should dare ridicule such absurd, unsupported magical bullshit, then you are "militant" and "hate god" and are "obsessed". (See: ding the lying liar)

Oh, and they get to declare victory over the s cientific community, despite having zero science on their side.

So how much time are you willing to spend trying to convince insane people that they are insane? Me...zero

 

[progressive hunter]

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

Exactly. These frauds have an adorable little game rigged for themselves. You have to come up with a cause for everything, but they don't. You have to produce evidence, but they don't. You have to explain how animals appeared and disappeared throughout history, but they don't. You have to explain radiometric dating in excruciating detail, dealing with all manner of horseshit talking points. But they are allowed to assert, without good evidence argument, that their zombie King is real and sits at the right hand of Yahweh. And , if you should dare ridicule such absurd, unsupported magical bullshit, then you are "militant" and "hate god" and are "obsessed". (See: ding the lying liar)

Oh, and they get to declare victory over the s cientific community, despite having zero science on their side.

So how much time are you willing to spend trying to convince insane people that they are insane? Me...zero

TROLL
WHEN YOU CANT REFUTE THE MESSAGE ATTACK THE MESSENGER,,,

ALINSKY 101

 

[bripat9643]

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

Exactly. These frauds have an adorable little game rigged for themselves. You have to come up with a cause for everything, but they don't. You have to produce evidence, but they don't. You have to explain how animals appeared and disappeared throughout history, but they don't. You have to explain radiometric dating in excruciating detail, dealing with all manner of horseshit talking points. But they are allowed to assert, without good evidence argument, that their zombie King is real and sits at the right hand of Yahweh. And , if you should dare ridicule such absurd, unsupported magical bullshit, then you are "militant" and "hate god" and are "obsessed". (See: ding the lying liar)

Oh, and they get to declare victory over the s cientific community, despite having zero science on their side.

So how much time are you willing to spend trying to convince insane people that they are insane? Me...zero

TROLL
WHEN YOU CANT REFUTE THE MESSAGE ATTACK THE MESSENGER,,,

ALINSKY 101

He's attacking the ridiculous things you say.

 

[bripat9643]

It certainly does. The "First Cause" argument is obviously false.

no its not

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

It's your theory. If you don't know, how can you claim it's true?

when did I claim fact??? its always been a theory just like evolution

just one problem,,

only one is taught as fact in public schools using tax payer money

Evolution has a massive base of evidence to support it. ID has only the Bible.

 

[progressive hunter]

no its not

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

It's your theory. If you don't know, how can you claim it's true?

when did I claim fact??? its always been a theory just like evolution

just one problem,,

only one is taught as fact in public schools using tax payer money

Evolution has a massive base of evidence to support it. ID has only the Bible.

no evolution doesnt,,,

 

[Hollie]

So who/what create God?

how the heck would I know??

It's your theory. If you don't know, how can you claim it's true?

when did I claim fact??? its always been a theory just like evolution

just one problem,,

only one is taught as fact in public schools using tax payer money

Evolution has a massive base of evidence to support it. ID has only the Bible.

no evolution doesnt,,,

I wouldn't expect your madrassah has a strong science program.