Science Proves the Bible Again

[Hollie]

An Introduction to Biblical Nonsense

People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

I have reviewed and found the atheists seem to back Satan and Satan backs them. For example, no more God because atheist science says so. The facts are science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists, i.e. people who believed in God and that he made the universe and everything in it. I can only conclude that you are looney or a bad person to believe in lies of Satan. I have been providing much evidence throughout my posts. One is we found that the chicken came before the egg in 2017 to put egg on the faces of secular scientists who believed the egg came first. These people just cannot accept true science because of they believe in false or fake science. You embarrass yourself in every post, so I will stop replying to you once more.

Just read my previous posts here and you have nothing, while I have provided observable, testable and falsifiable evidence.

I’m sure your “review” of Satan and his backing of atheists was thorough but I’m curious to know why you wastred your time? I’m also curious to know why you spend an inordinate amount of time cowering in abject fear of mythical entities which are simply superstitious nonsense. Why would you choose to live your life governed by fear and superstition? Absent rigid and unquestioning adherence to a book that you worship as an alleged “divine word” from the gods, your superstitions have everything to do with an existence based upon living in fear and trembling before the angry deity. As much as you would prefer to resist it, it is secular thinking and science which can illuminate those dark recesses of the mind and allow you to shed fear and ignorance of imaginary demons.

The facts are not that science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists.

The facts are;The earlier attempts by fundie christians to force Christian creationism into the schools made no effort to conceal the agenda of promoting Biblical literalism. Those efforts were originally titled as "Biblical Creationism" with great candor. Faced with the correct legal conclusions that it was merely religion, they retreated and renamed it "Scientific Creationism," making a half hearted attempt to edit out explicit Biblical references... but that fooled no one. When that met an equally unambiguous decision in the courts, the new version became "Intelligent Design." In the process, the creationist movement has become progressively less candid, more angry, more extremist and frankly more pathetic.

In the same way, when creationists find themselves unable to deal with the multiple independent sources of evidence for evolution that include the fossils, the genetic comparisons, comparative anatomy, biogeography, ecology etc., they retreat further and further into really angry outbursts as evidenced by the sweaty, chest-heaving antics of the ID'iot / creationists. But how does that help them?

Praying to supernatural entities, worshipping plastic statues on dashboards, etc. All very rational. Hallelujah down the street if you want, teach your children about flying winged men in nightgowns, fat naked babies playing harps, chariots of fire cruising through the clouds, that seas part and books predict the end of the world, teach them all of these things if you want to, believe in them all if you must, but please, oh please stop trying to force these beliefs on others and please don’t confuse the supernatural with reason and rationality.

Lastly, I have read your posts and there is not a single, verifiable bit of evidence presented for any of your various gods, demons or other supernatural inventions.

 

[james bond]

Intelligent design is based on the Bible. You make that obvious because you start quoting the Bible whenever anyone ridicules your theories.

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

There is intelligence behind God's design, but creation is far different from ID. Are you that dense to not be able to tell the difference? How is ID based on the Bible since you claim that, but Discovery Institute does not. Perhaps you are that thick.

I already explained; It's similar to an eternal universe. God is eternal. He has no beginning nor end. That's logical. He is spiritual, supernatural and all powerful as explained in the Book of Genesis. It's not my fault that you cannot comprehend God's nature.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I already explained; It's similar to an eternal universe. God is eternal. He has no beginning nor end.

That doesn't explain anything. When you point at something and say, "god did it!", you haven't explained anything at all. It's literally the opposite of an explanation. It substitutes one mystery for another .

 

[james bond]

it is secular thinking and science which can illuminate those dark recesses of the mind and allow you to shed fear and ignorance of imaginary demons.

You haven't provided any examples or evidence of this.

The facts are not that science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists.

The facts are;The earlier attempts by fundie christians to force Christian creationism into the schools made no effort to conceal the agenda of promoting Biblical literalism. Those efforts were originally titled as "Biblical Creationism" with great candor. Faced with the correct legal conclusions that it was merely religion, they retreated and renamed it "Scientific Creationism," making a half hearted attempt to edit out explicit Biblical references... but that fooled no one. When that met an equally unambiguous decision in the courts, the new version became "Intelligent Design." In the process, the creationist movement has become progressively less candid, more angry, more extremist and frankly more pathetic.

What you claim as "not" facts is wrong. I'm tired of posting scientific links and repeating myself.

multiple independent sources of evidence for evolution that include the fossils, the genetic comparisons, comparative anatomy, biogeography, ecology etc., they retreat further and further into really angry outbursts as evidenced by the sweaty, chest-heaving antics of the ID'iot / creationists. But how does that help them?

Finally, something that could be construed as an argument. The fossil evidence is lacking. For example, there is very little transitional fossils. The humans from monkeys fossils do not show human and monkey proto creatures. The small cranial structure shows they were likely chimps/apes or their hybrids. And how could they evolve when today's apes/chimps are not bipedal nor human-like. They still have the small cranial structures and are not bipedal. They are living fossils. Furthermore, fossils are tied to layers of the Earth and secular science thinks the layers are chronological. The layers are not based on chronology, but location. The names of the layers refer to location and not time. Also, your claim of multiple independent sources do not include creation scientists. You ignored my argument regarding that!

As for the rest, you veer off into religion and avoid the creation science which I have patiently explained to you over and over again. Stop with the ridiculous assertions. Evolution is based on faith-based beliefs such as long-time, common ancestor (tree of life) and descent with modification. The latter happens in microevolution, but does not happen with macroevolution such as humans from apes and birds from dinosaurs. Those are myths that evolutionists believe on faith-based beliefs.

 

[james bond]

Wrong. It is the entire scientific community. It's an accepted fact. That is why none 9f your fake "creation scientists" are actual scientists . Just shut up you little weasel....and don't forget to declare victory over the entire scientific community on your way out the door...go to church, where you belong, and stay out of the science topics.

Back to ad hominem attacks so I win what little debate you put up again.

Here's a list of creation scientists, so it makes you look very stupid, stupid, stupid with your silly post.

Creation scientists - creation.com

Where is your list of secular/atheist scientists? What have they done that is observable, testable and falsifiable?

 

[james bond]

I already explained; It's similar to an eternal universe. God is eternal. He has no beginning nor end.

That doesn't explain anything. When you point at something and say, "god did it!", you haven't explained anything at all. It's literally the opposite of an explanation. It substitutes one mystery for another .

Wrong again. I did not say God did it. He said that he did it. He was the only eyewitness. We can verify some of it through the fine tuning facts. The fact that spacetime exists and continues to expand is more hard evidence. OTOH you haven't presented any argument to refute what I have stated.

You claim it's one mystery for another, but there is not mystery with the Christian God since we have the Bible that explains what he did. You can't deny the carbon.

 

[Hollie]

it is secular thinking and science which can illuminate those dark recesses of the mind and allow you to shed fear and ignorance of imaginary demons.

You haven't provided any examples or evidence of this.

The facts are not that science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists.

The facts are;The earlier attempts by fundie christians to force Christian creationism into the schools made no effort to conceal the agenda of promoting Biblical literalism. Those efforts were originally titled as "Biblical Creationism" with great candor. Faced with the correct legal conclusions that it was merely religion, they retreated and renamed it "Scientific Creationism," making a half hearted attempt to edit out explicit Biblical references... but that fooled no one. When that met an equally unambiguous decision in the courts, the new version became "Intelligent Design." In the process, the creationist movement has become progressively less candid, more angry, more extremist and frankly more pathetic.

What you claim as "not" facts is wrong. I'm tired of posting scientific links and repeating myself.

multiple independent sources of evidence for evolution that include the fossils, the genetic comparisons, comparative anatomy, biogeography, ecology etc., they retreat further and further into really angry outbursts as evidenced by the sweaty, chest-heaving antics of the ID'iot / creationists. But how does that help them?

Finally, something that could be construed as an argument. The fossil evidence is lacking. For example, there is very little transitional fossils. The humans from monkeys fossils do not show human and monkey proto creatures. The small cranial structure shows they were likely chimps/apes or their hybrids. And how could they evolve when today's apes/chimps are not bipedal nor human-like. They still have the small cranial structures and are not bipedal. They are living fossils. Furthermore, fossils are tied to layers of the Earth and secular science thinks the layers are chronological. The layers are not based on chronology, but location. The names of the layers refer to location and not time. Also, your claim of multiple independent sources do not include creation scientists. You ignored my argument regarding that!

As for the rest, you veer off into religion and avoid the creation science which I have patiently explained to you over and over again. Stop with the ridiculous assertions. Evolution is based on faith-based beliefs such as long-time, common ancestor (tree of life) and descent with modification. The latter happens in microevolution, but does not happen with macroevolution such as humans from apes and birds from dinosaurs. Those are myths that evolutionists believe on faith-based beliefs.

The best evidence I can provide toward science illuminating those dark recesses of the mind would be the waning influence of Christianity and the end of the Dark Ages.
Western civilization emerged from the Dark Ages only when free thinkers, (scientists, mathematicians, writers, poets, musicians), were able to challenge the religious authorities and examine the world in terms of events and circumstances that are not held to an inflexible, rigorous dogma that is often in irreconcilable contradiction to the natural world.

A typical ID'iot / Flat Earth Society claim from creation ministries is "The fossil evidence is lacking?. Lacking for what? If you want evidence for transitional fossils, there is data available.

Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ


the evolution of new species is an observed phenomenon. we have examples of the transitional forms between fish and amphibians, amphibians and reptiles, reptiles and birds, and between apes and humans. So you are quite demonstrably wrong in baldly asserting that such evolution cannot occur. And the laws of probability, properly understood and applied, provide no objection to evolution at all.

Your Christian fundie based ignorance regarding biological evolution is fascinating. And beside it being irrelevant. I will pass on the following:

evolution does not require “sudden appearances.” The “haphazard creation” of a multi-billion nucleotide DNA molecule is found nowhere in any evolutionary theory, and it is not necessary. Evolution is an incremental stepwise process guided by natural selection. So the only relevant probability is that of any given point mutation on a DNA molecule being more advantageous than any other.

Since such advantageous mutations are then multiplied by thousands or millions for each generation, allowing for multiple millions of “dice throws” over several generations, the probability is actually so high as to be a sure bet.

In actuality, the only theory that requires the sudden appearance of a fully formed DNA molecule with nothing before it is (surprise, surprise) supernatural creation.


You again retreat to the imposed ignorance of the “humans from momkeys”, nonsense. This is a canard still used by the silly intelligent design groupies who have no grounding in science. Meaning, of course that the ‘monkeys into human beings’ displays a fundamental lack of understanding regarding biological evolution. Man was never a monkey. Man was never descended from a monkey. Man and primates shared a common ancestor but branched off in separate directions. That’s not at all uncommon in evolutionary history, by the way, for species to diverge in different directions while sharing a common ancestry.

For starters, you should have noticed that some of these fossils are more than mere skulls
And the skulls themselves are not merely "larger and smaller." Several of them are exactly what you asked for (half-way between apes and humans) in every respect from size of the brain, to shape of the teeth, to how they join the vertebral column.
And more importantly, we find them in a very particular order. The older ones are always more apelike than the younger ones. The intermediate ones are all of an intermediate age.

And finally, we find them associated in exactly the right order with progressively more sophisticated technologies. Some of these “monkeys that have become extinct” used fire, made art and buried their dead. How monkey-like does that really sound to you?

So here is your problem; you asked for examples of transitional fossils. I gave you examples. They are a just small representative of the thousands of fossils we have that creationists insist could not possible exist.

But, tough luck. They do exist, and those of us who have actually studied the evidence are now left to simply shake our heads at your discomfort.

And yes it is true that Christian fundies posing as “scientists” are excluded from the science debate, as they should. When they have nothing of substance to offer, that would make them irrelevant.

There is a segment of the world (primarily fundie Christians and Muslims) who will forever insist that such evidence for biological evolution and common descent does not exist, regardless of the evidence itself.

There is another segment of the world that does not care one way or the other.

But the relevant segment of the world consists of those who are intimately familiar with the actual evidence. These include the overwhelming majority of practicing scientists in all fields related to biology. And they documented biological evolution to be a demonstrated fact. They have the evidence that fundie christians and muslims deny.

So let's not pretend that you fundies have any deep familiarity with the evidence.

 

[bripat9643]

Intelligent design is based on the Bible. You make that obvious because you start quoting the Bible whenever anyone ridicules your theories.

Everything has to have a cause except God? How is that logic?

There is intelligence behind God's design, but creation is far different from ID. Are you that dense to not be able to tell the difference? How is ID based on the Bible since you claim that, but Discovery Institute does not. Perhaps you are that thick.

I already explained; It's similar to an eternal universe. God is eternal. He has no beginning nor end. That's logical. He is spiritual, supernatural and all powerful as explained in the Book of Genesis. It's not my fault that you cannot comprehend God's nature.

If you admit that not everything requires a cause, then how can you claim the universe requires a cause? Either everything requires a cause, or it doesn't. The first cause argument is a contradiction.

Also, you claim ID is not the same as creationism, but you just resorted to the Bible to justify ID.

 

[bripat9643]

it is secular thinking and science which can illuminate those dark recesses of the mind and allow you to shed fear and ignorance of imaginary demons.

You haven't provided any examples or evidence of this.

The facts are not that science, medicine, biology were founded by creation scientists.

The facts are;The earlier attempts by fundie christians to force Christian creationism into the schools made no effort to conceal the agenda of promoting Biblical literalism. Those efforts were originally titled as "Biblical Creationism" with great candor. Faced with the correct legal conclusions that it was merely religion, they retreated and renamed it "Scientific Creationism," making a half hearted attempt to edit out explicit Biblical references... but that fooled no one. When that met an equally unambiguous decision in the courts, the new version became "Intelligent Design." In the process, the creationist movement has become progressively less candid, more angry, more extremist and frankly more pathetic.

What you claim as "not" facts is wrong. I'm tired of posting scientific links and repeating myself.

multiple independent sources of evidence for evolution that include the fossils, the genetic comparisons, comparative anatomy, biogeography, ecology etc., they retreat further and further into really angry outbursts as evidenced by the sweaty, chest-heaving antics of the ID'iot / creationists. But how does that help them?

Finally, something that could be construed as an argument. The fossil evidence is lacking. For example, there is very little transitional fossils. The humans from monkeys fossils do not show human and monkey proto creatures. The small cranial structure shows they were likely chimps/apes or their hybrids. And how could they evolve when today's apes/chimps are not bipedal nor human-like. They still have the small cranial structures and are not bipedal. They are living fossils. Furthermore, fossils are tied to layers of the Earth and secular science thinks the layers are chronological. The layers are not based on chronology, but location. The names of the layers refer to location and not time. Also, your claim of multiple independent sources do not include creation scientists. You ignored my argument regarding that!

As for the rest, you veer off into religion and avoid the creation science which I have patiently explained to you over and over again. Stop with the ridiculous assertions. Evolution is based on faith-based beliefs such as long-time, common ancestor (tree of life) and descent with modification. The latter happens in microevolution, but does not happen with macroevolution such as humans from apes and birds from dinosaurs. Those are myths that evolutionists believe on faith-based beliefs.

The best evidence I can provide toward science illuminating those dark recesses of the mind would be the waning influence of Christianity and the end of the Dark Ages.
Western civilization emerged from the Dark Ages only when free thinkers, (scientists, mathematicians, writers, poets, musicians), were able to challenge the religious authorities and examine the world in terms of events and circumstances that are not held to an inflexible, rigorous dogma that is often in irreconcilable contradiction to the natural world.

A typical ID'iot / Flat Earth Society claim from creation ministries is "The fossil evidence is lacking?. Lacking for what? If you want evidence for transitional fossils, there is data available.

Transitional Vertebrate Fossils FAQ


the evolution of new species is an observed phenomenon. we have examples of the transitional forms between fish and amphibians, amphibians and reptiles, reptiles and birds, and between apes and humans. So you are quite demonstrably wrong in baldly asserting that such evolution cannot occur. And the laws of probability, properly understood and applied, provide no objection to evolution at all.

Your Christian fundie based ignorance regarding biological evolution is fascinating. And beside it being irrelevant. I will pass on the following:

evolution does not require “sudden appearances.” The “haphazard creation” of a multi-billion nucleotide DNA molecule is found nowhere in any evolutionary theory, and it is not necessary. Evolution is an incremental stepwise process guided by natural selection. So the only relevant probability is that of any given point mutation on a DNA molecule being more advantageous than any other.

Since such advantageous mutations are then multiplied by thousands or millions for each generation, allowing for multiple millions of “dice throws” over several generations, the probability is actually so high as to be a sure bet.

In actuality, the only theory that requires the sudden appearance of a fully formed DNA molecule with nothing before it is (surprise, surprise) supernatural creation.


You again retreat to the imposed ignorance of the “humans from momkeys”, nonsense. This is a canard still used by the silly intelligent design groupies who have no grounding in science. Meaning, of course that the ‘monkeys into human beings’ displays a fundamental lack of understanding regarding biological evolution. Man was never a monkey. Man was never descended from a monkey. Man and primates shared a common ancestor but branched off in separate directions. That’s not at all uncommon in evolutionary history, by the way, for species to diverge in different directions while sharing a common ancestry.

For starters, you should have noticed that some of these fossils are more than mere skulls
And the skulls themselves are not merely "larger and smaller." Several of them are exactly what you asked for (half-way between apes and humans) in every respect from size of the brain, to shape of the teeth, to how they join the vertebral column.
And more importantly, we find them in a very particular order. The older ones are always more apelike than the younger ones. The intermediate ones are all of an intermediate age.

And finally, we find them associated in exactly the right order with progressively more sophisticated technologies. Some of these “monkeys that have become extinct” used fire, made art and buried their dead. How monkey-like does that really sound to you?

So here is your problem; you asked for examples of transitional fossils. I gave you examples. They are a just small representative of the thousands of fossils we have that creationists insist could not possible exist.

But, tough luck. They do exist, and those of us who have actually studied the evidence are now left to simply shake our heads at your discomfort.

And yes it is true that Christian fundies posing as “scientists” are excluded from the science debate, as they should. When they have nothing of substance to offer, that would make them irrelevant.

There is a segment of the world (primarily fundie Christians and Muslims) who will forever insist that such evidence for biological evolution and common descent does not exist, regardless of the evidence itself.

There is another segment of the world that does not care one way or the other.

But the relevant segment of the world consists of those who are intimately familiar with the actual evidence. These include the overwhelming majority of practicing scientists in all fields related to biology. And they documented biological evolution to be a demonstrated fact. They have the evidence that fundie christians and muslims deny.

So let's not pretend that you fundies have any deep familiarity with the evidence.

 

[Wyatt earp]

People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

That's your retort, fucking nothing?

What else is new from you heathens ..



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

Haha,yet another charlatan,retro-fitting cherry picked nonsense after the fact. What of all the biblical nonsense proven to be bullshit?

And where is all the knowledge and successful predictions from this batch of magical bullshit? Where were the biblical physicists, describingthe big bang, in the year 1500? Why is it you charlatans have to wait until this stuff os discovered? Why aren't you using the Bible to discover it?

Funny how the Bible allegedly teaches us about all this...and yet every one of you frauds had to wait for hard working scientists to dedicate their lives to extracting this knowledge, before any of you could wrap it in the veneer of your magical bullshit....

After the fact I just gave you a few among many that you can't refuse ..


And you retard tye big bang theory was made by a Catholic priest.



Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître, RAS Associate was a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, mathematician, astronomer, and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Louvain. He proposed on theoretical grounds that the universe is expanding, which was observationally confirmed soon afterwards by Edwin Hubble. Wikipedia

 

[Wyatt earp]

People get addicted on porn like drugs. That is not nonsense. It sounds you're addicted to nonsense.

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

Cave linked to John the Baptist


Cave linked to John the Baptist
By Karin Laub
The Associated Press
KIBBUTZ TZUBA, Israel — Archaeologists think they’ve found a cave where John the Baptist baptized many of his followers — basing their theory on thousands of shards from ritual jugs, a stone used for foot cleansing and wall carvings that tell the story of the biblical preacher.

Only a few artifacts linked to New Testament figures have ever been found in the Holy Land, and the cave is potentially a major discovery in biblical archaeology.

“John the Baptist, who was just a figure from the Gospels, now comes to life,” British archaeologist Shimon Gibson said during an exclusive tour of the cave given to The Associated Press.

 

[Hollie]

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

Cave linked to John the Baptist


Cave linked to John the Baptist
By Karin Laub
The Associated Press
KIBBUTZ TZUBA, Israel — Archaeologists think they’ve found a cave where John the Baptist baptized many of his followers — basing their theory on thousands of shards from ritual jugs, a stone used for foot cleansing and wall carvings that tell the story of the biblical preacher.

Only a few artifacts linked to New Testament figures have ever been found in the Holy Land, and the cave is potentially a major discovery in biblical archaeology.

“John the Baptist, who was just a figure from the Gospels, now comes to life,” British archaeologist Shimon Gibson said during an exclusive tour of the cave given to The Associated Press.

And this is relevant, how?

 

[Hollie]

On the other hand, you're addicted to sidestepping and deflection when direct refutation is presented to biblical "science" claims.

Absurdities of biblical "science" claims are easily refuted.

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

That's your retort, fucking nothing?

What else is new from you heathens ..



.

Oh, my. Another angry thumper.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What's the most prescribed medicine? It's pain relief meds and people are wanting the strongest, getting addicted and dying for it.

Why do we watch porn for? Pleasure and prurient interest.

The above chemicals are good in moderation. What argument do you have when they are in excess and not in moderation, i.e. causing one to head towards addiction?

I'm only telling it like it is -- TRUTH. Your Satan filter has made you see "sidestepping and deflection" and think you have "direct refutation" when you are the one who is WRONG. Like I have been saying atheists and their scientists are usually wrong. Otherwise, you would be presenting better arguments by using the scientific method. None of your theories are observable, testable nor falsifiable while science backs up the Bible.

You won't be able to answer my question, when I just presented more evidence for the Bible and how science backs it up. This is ancient text we found and verified and it knows about stuff people do on the internet today.

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

That's your retort, fucking nothing?

What else is new from you heathens ..



.

Oh, my. Another angry thumper.

Thumper???


call me Micheal the arch angel bitch, now do you have something to refute me on?



btw, the only ones who can read the bible and comprehend it is the ones who have the holy spirit in them, you heathens just take it out of context


2 Corinthians 4:4 (NIV)The God of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, so they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ.







English Standard Version
In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Berean Study Bible
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Berean Literal Bible
in whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, so as for not to beam forth the illumination of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

New American Standard Bible
in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

King James Bible
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Christian Standard Bible
In their case, the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Contemporary English Version
The god who rules this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers. They cannot see the light, which is the good news about our glorious Christ, who shows what God is like.

Good News Translation
They do not believe, because their minds have been kept in the dark by the evil god of this world. He keeps them from seeing the light shining on them, the light that comes from the Good News about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In their case, the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

International Standard Version
In their case, the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe to keep them from seeing the light of the glorious gospel of the Messiah, who is the image of God.

NET Bible
among whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of those who do not believe so they would not see the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God.

New Heart English Bible
in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, to prevent the light shining from the Good News of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Those whose intellects The God of this world has blinded, because they do not believe, lest the light of The Gospel of the glory of The Messiah, who is the image of God, should dawn upon them.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
The god of this world has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. As a result, they don't see the light of the Good News about Christ's glory. It is Christ who is God's image.

New American Standard 1977
in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Jubilee Bible 2000
In whom the god of this age has blinded the understanding of those who do not believe, that the light of the gospel of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine in them.

King James 2000 Bible
In whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of them who believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

American King James Version
In whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine to them.

American Standard Version
in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them .

Douay-Rheims Bible
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.

Darby Bible Translation
in whom the god of this world has blinded the thoughts of the unbelieving, so that the radiancy of the glad tidings of the glory of the Christ, who is [the] image of God, should not shine forth [for them].

English Revised Version
in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them.

Webster's Bible Translation
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them who believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine to them.

Weymouth New Testament
in whom the god of this present age has blinded their unbelieving minds so as to shut out the sunshine of the Good News of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God.

World English Bible
in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the Good News of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn on them.

Young's Literal Translation
in whom the god of this age did blind the minds of the unbelieving, that there doth not shine forth to them the enlightening of the good news of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God;

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You haven't provided any examples or evidence of this.

Yes he has, you liar. Many times. I specifically remember , for instance, the example of modern germ theory being presented directly to you. You religious nutters used to think demons caused sickness. Now you know pathogens can and do. But you , no doubt, ignored this direct and total refutation of your embarrassing bullshit to prance and preen like the little charlatan peacock you are.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

now do you have something to refute me on?

I directly refuted your desperate nonsense, and you ignored it. You will do the same with him. You are just putting on a little dog and pony show...to soothe yourself...

 

[progressive hunter]

now do you have something to refute me on?

I directly refuted your desperate nonsense, and you ignored it. You will do the same with him. You are just putting on a little dog and pony show...to soothe yourself...

NO YOU DIDNT,,,TROLL

 

[Hollie]

Sorry, your appeals to Satan and other ancient fears and superstitious nonsense are yours to resolve.

The facts are, biological evolution, science, medicine... these are all things I can source with reasoned, written arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Further, we actually have repeatable results that confirm the reliability of the scientific method, Your loathing for science, for reason and rationality while living your miserable existence in trembling fear of angry gods is truly pitiable. When it comes to ancient tales and fables, which are demonstrably wrong, the ranting from the hyper-religious devolve quickly into screeching tirades.

For all your screeching about “bible science”, it’s obvious you can’t provide a single, specific “scientific fact” from any of the various bibles.

keep on telling yourself that holly.....................

• The universe had a beginning. (Genesis 1:1) In contrast, many ancient myths describe the universe, not as being created, but as being organized from existing chaos. The Babylonians believed that the gods that gave birth to the universe came from two oceans. Other legends say that the universe came from a giant egg.
  
  
• The universe is governed day-to-day by rational natural laws, not by the whims of deities. (Job 38:33; Jeremiah 33:25) Myths from around the world teach that humans are helpless before the unpredictable and sometimes merciless acts of the gods.
  
  
• The earth is suspended in empty space. (Job 26:7) Many ancient peoples believed that the world was a flat disk supported by a giant or an animal, such as a buffalo or a turtle.
  
  
• Rivers and springs are fed by water that has evaporated from the oceans and other sources and then has fallen back to earth as rain, snow, or hail. (Job 36:27, 28; Ecclesiastes 1:7; Isaiah 55:10; Amos 9:6) The ancient Greeks thought that rivers were fed by underground ocean water, and this idea persisted into the 18th century.
  
  
• The mountains rise and fall, and today’s mountains were once under the ocean. (Psalm 104:6, 8) In contrast, several myths say that the mountains were created in their current form by the gods.
  
  
• Sanitary practices protect health. The Law given to the nation of Israel included regulations for washing after touching a dead body, quarantining those with infectious disease, and disposing of human waste safely. (Leviticus 11:28; 13:1-5; Deuteronomy 23:13) By contrast, one of the Egyptian remedies in use when these commands were given called for applying to an open wound a mixture that included human excrement.

As usual, nothing in that long cut and paste speaks to anything but vague generalities.

That's your retort, fucking nothing?

What else is new from you heathens ..



.

Oh, my. Another angry thumper.

Thumper???


call me Micheal the arch angel bitch, now do you have something to refute me on?



btw, the only ones who can read the bible and comprehend it is the ones who have the holy spirit in them, you heathens just take it out of context


2 Corinthians 4:4 (NIV)The God of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, so they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ.







English Standard Version
In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Berean Study Bible
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Berean Literal Bible
in whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, so as for not to beam forth the illumination of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

New American Standard Bible
in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

King James Bible
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

Christian Standard Bible
In their case, the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Contemporary English Version
The god who rules this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers. They cannot see the light, which is the good news about our glorious Christ, who shows what God is like.

Good News Translation
They do not believe, because their minds have been kept in the dark by the evil god of this world. He keeps them from seeing the light shining on them, the light that comes from the Good News about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
In their case, the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers so they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

International Standard Version
In their case, the god of this world has blinded the minds of those who do not believe to keep them from seeing the light of the glorious gospel of the Messiah, who is the image of God.

NET Bible
among whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of those who do not believe so they would not see the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God.

New Heart English Bible
in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, to prevent the light shining from the Good News of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English
Those whose intellects The God of this world has blinded, because they do not believe, lest the light of The Gospel of the glory of The Messiah, who is the image of God, should dawn upon them.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
The god of this world has blinded the minds of those who don't believe. As a result, they don't see the light of the Good News about Christ's glory. It is Christ who is God's image.

New American Standard 1977
in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Jubilee Bible 2000
In whom the god of this age has blinded the understanding of those who do not believe, that the light of the gospel of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine in them.

King James 2000 Bible
In whom the god of this age has blinded the minds of them who believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

American King James Version
In whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine to them.

American Standard Version
in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them .

Douay-Rheims Bible
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of unbelievers, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not shine unto them.

Darby Bible Translation
in whom the god of this world has blinded the thoughts of the unbelieving, so that the radiancy of the glad tidings of the glory of the Christ, who is [the] image of God, should not shine forth [for them].

English Revised Version
in whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn upon them.

Webster's Bible Translation
In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them who believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine to them.

Weymouth New Testament
in whom the god of this present age has blinded their unbelieving minds so as to shut out the sunshine of the Good News of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God.

World English Bible
in whom the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving, that the light of the Good News of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should not dawn on them.

Young's Literal Translation
in whom the god of this age did blind the minds of the unbelieving, that there doth not shine forth to them the enlightening of the good news of the glory of the Christ, who is the image of God;

You should duct tape you bibles into a double wide for some serious, angry xtian thumping.

 

[LittleNipper]

prove this isnt

The Zapata Track

I know you wont watch it

Obvious fraud. Why would anyone remove human 100 million year old fossil footprints from the bedrock?

TO PRESERVE THEM AND STUDY THEM


its obvious you didnt watch the video

Wrong. It's because you can't fake them if they are still attached to the bedrock. Once a block is removed from the strata, you have destroyed whatever provenance it had.

So, how exactly does your hypothesis reflect on the removal of fossils from their surrounding strata? Does this not then destroy whatever provenance that they had according to what your BELIEVE?