Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Hilarious
Ever ask yourself why no scientific organization agrees with your denial position.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hilarious
Ever ask yourself why no scientific organization agrees with your denial position.
Just a music vid eh
You one dumb motherfucker.
Yeah, I've already referenced those oil & gas so-called scientists.Money for nuthin' baby.
Yeah, I've already referenced those oil & gas so-called scientists.
Geoengineering.....~S~What do government financed doomer scientists produce of value?
Yeah, they find the cause of our climate change in the ground. They're not climate scientists.Oil and gas scientists actually produce a useful, profitable product.
What do government financed doomer scientists produce of value?
Yeah, they find the cause of our climate change in the ground. They're not climate scientists.
A livable planet.
That's hilarious!
How did the fake hockey stick give us a livable planet?
It's not fake.
Can you call an oil & gas "scientist" to explain it to you?
When has this been debunked?The hockey stick was faked.
Has Michael Mann finally paid the legal judgment against him?
Liar. Pathetic lies.The whole way the Co2 FRAUD spun out of the homO silence 2010 2012 was to re-write history. That is what McBullshit did. The Co2 FRAUD was busted. North American Ice Age needed to be "changed" since it proved
GREENLAND FROZE
while
NORTH AMERICA THAWED
and you have helped to expose McBullshit as BULLSHIT, thanks...
Lie.The hockey stick was faked.
When has this been debunked?
![]()
I'll wait.
Debunk this fuckup.Where did the MWP go? Where is the LIA?
Debunk this fuckup.
Critiques leveled soon after Mann published his 23-year-old “hockey stick” research persist, even though 19 of the warmest years on record have occurred since then, and the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming has grown substantially stronger.
Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, which shows the temperature of the Earth over the past 1000 years, has been a topic of controversy for many years. The graph was first published in a 1999 paper by Michael Mann and colleagues, which was an extension of a 1998 study in Nature. The graph was highlighted in the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Since then, there have been repeated claims that the reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, no more than an artefact of the statistical methods used to create it 1. However, later studies support the key conclusion: the world is warmer now than it has been for at least 1000 years 1. In fact, most later temperature reconstructions fall within the error bars of the original hockey stick 1.
In 2006, the US National Academy of Science assessed the validity of temperature reconstructions, including the hockey stick. The report states: “The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes both additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and pronounced changes in a variety of local proxy indicators, such as melting on ice caps and the retreat of glaciers around the world” 1.
While there have been claims that the hockey stick graph is flawed, most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways, it was not far off the mark 1.