Scientists Simulate "Runaway Greenhouse Effect" That Turns Earth Into Uninhabitable Hell

Oil and gas scientists actually produce a useful, profitable product.

What do government financed doomer scientists produce of value?
Yeah, they find the cause of our climate change in the ground. They're not climate scientists.

A livable planet.
 
The hockey stick was faked.
Has Michael Mann finally paid the legal judgment against him?
When has this been debunked?

hockeystickgraph.jpg


I'll wait.
 
The whole way the Co2 FRAUD spun out of the homO silence 2010 2012 was to re-write history. That is what McBullshit did. The Co2 FRAUD was busted. North American Ice Age needed to be "changed" since it proved

GREENLAND FROZE

while

NORTH AMERICA THAWED


and you have helped to expose McBullshit as BULLSHIT, thanks...
Liar. Pathetic lies.
 
Where did the MWP go? Where is the LIA?
Debunk this fuckup.

Critiques leveled soon after Mann published his 23-year-old “hockey stick” research persist, even though 19 of the warmest years on record have occurred since then, and the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming has grown substantially stronger.
 
Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, which shows the temperature of the Earth over the past 1000 years, has been a topic of controversy for many years. The graph was first published in a 1999 paper by Michael Mann and colleagues, which was an extension of a 1998 study in Nature. The graph was highlighted in the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Since then, there have been repeated claims that the reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, no more than an artefact of the statistical methods used to create it 1. However, later studies support the key conclusion: the world is warmer now than it has been for at least 1000 years 1. In fact, most later temperature reconstructions fall within the error bars of the original hockey stick 1.

In 2006, the US National Academy of Science assessed the validity of temperature reconstructions, including the hockey stick. The report states: “The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes both additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and pronounced changes in a variety of local proxy indicators, such as melting on ice caps and the retreat of glaciers around the world” 1.

While there have been claims that the hockey stick graph is flawed, most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways, it was not far off the mark 1.
 
Debunk this fuckup.

Critiques leveled soon after Mann published his 23-year-old “hockey stick” research persist, even though 19 of the warmest years on record have occurred since then, and the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming has grown substantially stronger.

even though 19 of the warmest years on record have occurred since then
Wow! Out of 140 years? I guess that justifies trillions of dollars wasted on windmills.

and the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming

Money for nothing, chicks for free.
 
Michael Mann’s “hockey stick” graph, which shows the temperature of the Earth over the past 1000 years, has been a topic of controversy for many years. The graph was first published in a 1999 paper by Michael Mann and colleagues, which was an extension of a 1998 study in Nature. The graph was highlighted in the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Since then, there have been repeated claims that the reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, no more than an artefact of the statistical methods used to create it 1. However, later studies support the key conclusion: the world is warmer now than it has been for at least 1000 years 1. In fact, most later temperature reconstructions fall within the error bars of the original hockey stick 1.

In 2006, the US National Academy of Science assessed the validity of temperature reconstructions, including the hockey stick. The report states: “The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes both additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and pronounced changes in a variety of local proxy indicators, such as melting on ice caps and the retreat of glaciers around the world” 1.

While there have been claims that the hockey stick graph is flawed, most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways, it was not far off the mark 1.

Most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways

DURR
 

Forum List

Back
Top