healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 29,042
- 10,525
The filing was made in a case shut down last month [May 2014] by a federal judge who found that there was no coordination because the outside groups were not engaged in explicit political activity.
The spin from Democrats on the documents indicated there was some kind of open investigation against Walker, which is untrue.
Read more: Scott Walker reserves TV time amid bad news - Maggie Haberman - POLITICO.com
But the liberal campaign to discredit Walker isnt limited to TNRs inflammatory trash. As the New York Times reported this afternoon, there was an attempt by some Wisconsin prosecutors to tie Walkers recall campaign to illegal contributions. But you have to click on the piece that was trumpeted on the papers home page to learn that the case was unproven and, in fact, dismissed by a federal judge and that the story is based on a federal suit that sought to reveal the unsubstantiated allegations in the records of this cold case. In fact, you have to read down to the end of the sixth paragraph of the piece to read, in a quote from Walkers camp, that two judges have rejected the characterizations [of the Walker campaigns alleged illegal activity] contained in these documents. The Times only mentions the pertinent fact that a federal judge halted the investigation as a politicized fishing expedition in the last sentence of the article.
Liberals Are Afraid of Scott Walker « Commentary Magazine
The spin from Democrats on the documents indicated there was some kind of open investigation against Walker, which is untrue.
Read more: Scott Walker reserves TV time amid bad news - Maggie Haberman - POLITICO.com
But the liberal campaign to discredit Walker isnt limited to TNRs inflammatory trash. As the New York Times reported this afternoon, there was an attempt by some Wisconsin prosecutors to tie Walkers recall campaign to illegal contributions. But you have to click on the piece that was trumpeted on the papers home page to learn that the case was unproven and, in fact, dismissed by a federal judge and that the story is based on a federal suit that sought to reveal the unsubstantiated allegations in the records of this cold case. In fact, you have to read down to the end of the sixth paragraph of the piece to read, in a quote from Walkers camp, that two judges have rejected the characterizations [of the Walker campaigns alleged illegal activity] contained in these documents. The Times only mentions the pertinent fact that a federal judge halted the investigation as a politicized fishing expedition in the last sentence of the article.
Liberals Are Afraid of Scott Walker « Commentary Magazine
