Sea level potential rise doubles in new study

[Mikeoxenormous]

we have been hearing from the fanatical religious left wing GW fanatics, that with the increase of CO2 that the oceans have been warming to the point that there would be an increase in the frequency and the increase in power of hurricanes.

Nope. You're just making up strange tales.

Increased frequency was never predicted. That's a big ol' whopper on your part.

Increased strength is predicted for the future, and we are beginning to see that.

Got any other fantasies for us, or are you just going to pout more about the "libtards" who keep spanking you and sending you home to momma in tears?

Someone please tell me that with the melting icecaps(temperature increases) that there is a cold blob in the Atlantic that will interfere with the predictions of those fanatics(oh boo hoo, libtards fucked up again). You think they way this was reported that an alien from outerspace caused that blob. 'Cold blob' to be a wild card in the 2016 Atlantic hurricane season Whether or not ocean currents draw cold water from this blob southward into tropical regions of the Atlantic could determine how active the season becomes.

Ruh-roh. You seem confused. First you told us those awful liberals predict more hurricanes, now you say they predict less. Can you make up your mind?

Anyways, we're glad you're here in the Environment folder. Fresh meat is always welcome. We were getting bored smacking around the same old kook losers.

Obama Proclaims: 'Hurricane Intensity' to Increase 'As Climate Continues to Warm'

Obama said global warming would also "make storms more costly" in proclaiming this week (May 25-31) National Hurricane Preparedness Week:

"As the climate continues to warm, hurricane intensity and rainfall are projected to increase, and we expect sea level rise to make storm surges more costly. That is why, last year, I issued an Executive Order directing the Federal Governmentto take coordinated action to prepare our Nation for the impacts of climate change.

Mamooth is guaranteed to open mouth insert foot. Just think that Mamooth will be voting in the next election too. It is a shame that this person who believes in global warming will continue to be their worst enemy by using fossil fuels for their electricity, and transportation, while if they remove themselves from the Earth that would help decrease the CO2 output by 1. Such hypocrites that they are.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Hurricanes And Climate Change: Storms Likely To Get Stronger And More Frequent, Study Shows

Hurricanes And Climate Change: Storms Likely To Get Stronger And More Frequent, Study Shows

Mamooth, here is your own liberal news org confirming that frequency was predicted.

 

[depotoo]

7. The U.N.’s top climate scientist said in 2007 we only had four years to save the world
Rajendra Pachauri, the former head of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said in 2007that if “there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late.”

“What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment,” he said.

..........

I find it so funny how he was touted as an expert climate scientist. Has anyone ever looked up what his degree was in? In industrial engineering and economics, with emphasis on railways.
Why would he have ever been selected to head the ipcc? I believe for sinister reasons. He was easily manipulated.

 

[mamooth]

"As the climate continues to warm, hurricane intensity and rainfall are projected to increase

And that's happened. So, another successful prediction of climate science.

As far as your other study goes

"A new study by Kerry Emanuel, a prominent hurricane researcher at MIT, found that contrary to previous findings, tropical cyclones are likely to become both stronger and more frequent in the years to come, especially in the western North Pacific, where storms can devastate the heavily populated coastlines of Asian nations."

First, "contrary to previous findings". Thanks for confirming that the previous science did not predict more frequent hurricanes.

Second, Emanuel is predicting higher frequency in the future. You understand what the future is? As he future has not arrived, we are not able to judge his prediction.

Third, he's one guy.

You're just not very good at this. All you can do, in addition to your crying, is confirm my points.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"As the climate continues to warm, hurricane intensity and rainfall are projected to increase

And that's happened. So, another successful prediction of climate science.

As far as your other study goes

"A new study by Kerry Emanuel, a prominent hurricane researcher at MIT, found that contrary to previous findings, tropical cyclones are likely to become both stronger and more frequent in the years to come, especially in the western North Pacific, where storms can devastate the heavily populated coastlines of Asian nations."

First, "contrary to previous findings". Thanks for confirming that the previous science did not predict more frequent hurricanes.

Second, Emanuel is predicting higher frequency in the future. You understand what the future is? As he future has not arrived, we are not able to judge his prediction.

Third, he's one guy.

You're just not very good at this. All you can do, in addition to your crying, is confirm my points.

3 years , 10 years 100 years 1000 years from now, the 3 years was wrong, the 10 years was wrong, 100 or 1000 years we wont be here. So you wont know how the outcome will be. Such stupid people who vote democrat.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"As the climate continues to warm, hurricane intensity and rainfall are projected to increase

And that's happened. So, another successful prediction of climate science.

As far as your other study goes

"A new study by Kerry Emanuel, a prominent hurricane researcher at MIT, found that contrary to previous findings, tropical cyclones are likely to become both stronger and more frequent in the years to come, especially in the western North Pacific, where storms can devastate the heavily populated coastlines of Asian nations."

First, "contrary to previous findings". Thanks for confirming that the previous science did not predict more frequent hurricanes.

Second, Emanuel is predicting higher frequency in the future. You understand what the future is? As he future has not arrived, we are not able to judge his prediction.

Third, he's one guy.

You're just not very good at this. All you can do, in addition to your crying, is confirm my points.

I guess Sandy which was a Cat 2 was more powerful than the Cat 3 Katrina? Funny how you libs always lower the standards so the next time something happens, the event ends up over the standard.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Why is it when the temperature goes up, the libtards yell Global Warming(err I mean Climate Change) but then when it snows, they call it a weather event?
Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Just follow the money, Al Jazeera Gore made 1/2 billion dollars because stupid people gave it to him to save the planet.

 

[Crick]

Do you not understand the difference between climate and weather? The climate is warming and has been almost without cease since the turn of the last century. The last few decades' temperatures have risen dramatically quickly. That has not eliminated snow on the planet and so, yes indeedy, it still snows here and there. A single snow or even a week's worth of snow, is weather. If temperatures dropped for many months and snowfall globally increased, you might be seeing a climate change. But that's not what has happened, is it.

 

[xband]

Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.

And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...

I found it.....


Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.


Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry


United Nations “Climate Refugees”

In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.

The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.

In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.



.

Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.
We just can't find them.

Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.

Dumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.

The climatologists predictions have mostly been on the conservative side. And the ice melt worldwide is exceeding their worst case estimates.

Gave you a link tard. Try to fucking disprove it...

Link Tard is a new one for me and thanks. I will save it for future reference.

 

[Old Rocks]

Why is it when the temperature goes up, the libtards yell Global Warming(err I mean Climate Change) but then when it snows, they call it a weather event?
Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Just follow the money, Al Jazeera Gore made 1/2 billion dollars because stupid people gave it to him to save the planet.

Damn, you are one stupid lying ass. First, sure, the mid-west got a little April snow. Set any records? Either for temperature or amount of snowfall in April for that area? In the meantime, here in Portland, Oregon, we have had a couple of days of 80 + weather that has set records. The important point is that in both cases we are speaking of weather, not climate.

One of the primary predictions of global warming is for wider and wilder swings in weather, with an overall warming. The swings are weather, the overall warming is climate.

UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for March, 2016: +0.73 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD

The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for March, 2016 is +0.73 deg. C, down a little from the February record-setting value of +0.83 deg. C (click for full size version). This makes March 2016 the warmest March in the satellite record (since 1979), and statistically tied with April 1998 for the second warmest month.

Vice President Gore did not make his money off of people giving him money. He inherited a modest fortune from his father, invested it in high tech when that market was on a downer, and vastly increased that fortune. He was educated as a journalist, and used that education to state in layman's terms what the scientists were stating concerning global warming. And fools like you hate him for stating reality.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Do you not understand the difference between climate and weather? The climate is warming and has been almost without cease since the turn of the last century. The last few decades' temperatures have risen dramatically quickly. That has not eliminated snow on the planet and so, yes indeedy, it still snows here and there. A single snow or even a week's worth of snow, is weather. If temperatures dropped for many months and snowfall globally increased, you might be seeing a climate change. But that's not what has happened, is it.

Just the typical bullshit argument from a religiously fanatical zelot. Of course when it is warming then it is global warming, and when this past weekend when it was freezing out, it is just weather. If liberals didn't have this argument then it would all be a lie. I will ask you libtards once again, if the ICECAPS are melting(Above 32 degrees) how can freezing weather(Below 32 degrees) show up in Virginia? Now for the deer in the headlights look. The dunce in the corner look. The Obama is an idiot look.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Why is it when the temperature goes up, the libtards yell Global Warming(err I mean Climate Change) but then when it snows, they call it a weather event?
Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Snow to slick roads in midwestern, northeastern US through Saturday

Just follow the money, Al Jazeera Gore made 1/2 billion dollars because stupid people gave it to him to save the planet.

Damn, you are one stupid lying ass. First, sure, the mid-west got a little April snow. Set any records? Either for temperature or amount of snowfall in April for that area? In the meantime, here in Portland, Oregon, we have had a couple of days of 80 + weather that has set records. The important point is that in both cases we are speaking of weather, not climate.

One of the primary predictions of global warming is for wider and wilder swings in weather, with an overall warming. The swings are weather, the overall warming is climate.

UAH V6 Global Temperature Update for March, 2016: +0.73 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD

The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for March, 2016 is +0.73 deg. C, down a little from the February record-setting value of +0.83 deg. C (click for full size version). This makes March 2016 the warmest March in the satellite record (since 1979), and statistically tied with April 1998 for the second warmest month.

Vice President Gore did not make his money off of people giving him money. He inherited a modest fortune from his father, invested it in high tech when that market was on a downer, and vastly increased that fortune. He was educated as a journalist, and used that education to state in layman's terms what the scientists were stating concerning global warming. And fools like you hate him for stating reality.

http://www.wnd.com/2007/03/40445/

Al Gore defends his extraordinary personal energy usage by telling critics he maintains a “carbon neutral” lifestyle by buying “carbon offsets,” but the company that receives his payments turns out to be partly owned and chaired by the former vice president himself.

Al Jazeera Gore, is in the top 1%er. Why don't you go after this crook like you guys do with CEO's of a business who actually makes or provides something? Such stupid dumbasses you liberals are. Next time you call me a liar, you better get your fucking FACTS straight. A dead liberal is a good liberal.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

A tale of two cities: Chicago and Houston | GunsSaveLife.com

Similar sized cities with a lot in common.

Until you get to gun availability, temperature and homicide rates.

Gun control activists’ conclusion: Cold weather causes murders.

Hat tip to Tom Immel.



This entry was posted on March 20, 2013 at 11:30 am and is filed under Blog. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

A little humor, but you know the liberals wont get it.

 

[JimH52]

Great to have a Scientist on Board!

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Great to have a Scientist on Board!

Notice how the lib wouldn't answer my question, just puffed it off as typical of a lefty.

 

[mamooth]

I will ask you libtards once again, if the ICECAPS are melting(Above 32 degrees) how can freezing weather(Below 32 degrees) show up in Virginia?

Because weather isn't the same all over the world.

Damn, you're stupid. If you're trying to win this week's denier dumb-off, that was a good effort. Seriously, you're one impressive moron.

Now for the deer in the headlights look. The dunce in the corner look. The Obama is an idiot look.

Actually, that's mocking laughter, as we find it hard to believe you could actually be as stupid as you sound. Are you perhaps just pretending to be retarded? Are you a liberal plant, sent here on a mission to make conservatives look like drooling imbeciles?

Sadly, I think you really are as dimwitted as you sound. As keeps being demonstrating here over and over, most deniers are rather stupid people. And they cry a lot. What a combo, wimpy and stupid.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

If you raise the temperature of a house from 69 degrees to 75 degrees, will the house go up all over the house, or just in some areas? How can temperatures above 32 degrees(Ice melt) cause temperatures below 32 degrees hundreds of miles south? Because you liberals are dumber than a box of rocks, or left wing religious fanatical zelots, who cant come to grips that your whole life is a lie, and wont remove yourselves from the Earth, reducing the CO2 footprint , thus saving the planet. See how moronic you are?

 

[JimH52]

I will ask you libtards once again, if the ICECAPS are melting(Above 32 degrees) how can freezing weather(Below 32 degrees) show up in Virginia?

Because weather isn't the same all over the world.

Damn, you're stupid. If you're trying to win this week's denier dumb-off, that was a good effort. Seriously, you're one impressive moron.

Now for the deer in the headlights look. The dunce in the corner look. The Obama is an idiot look.

Actually, that's mocking laughter, as we find it hard to believe you could actually be as stupid as you sound. Are you perhaps just pretending to be retarded? Are you a liberal plant, sent here on a mission to make conservatives look like drooling imbeciles?

Sadly, I think you really are as dimwitted as you sound. As keeps being demonstrating here over and over, most deniers are rather stupid people. And they cry a lot. What a combo, wimpy and stupid.

Mamooth, this guy is so stupid, it is not worth the key strokes to argue with him....her....it.

 

[jc456]

I will ask you libtards once again, if the ICECAPS are melting(Above 32 degrees) how can freezing weather(Below 32 degrees) show up in Virginia?

Because weather isn't the same all over the world.

Damn, you're stupid. If you're trying to win this week's denier dumb-off, that was a good effort. Seriously, you're one impressive moron.

Now for the deer in the headlights look. The dunce in the corner look. The Obama is an idiot look.

Actually, that's mocking laughter, as we find it hard to believe you could actually be as stupid as you sound. Are you perhaps just pretending to be retarded? Are you a liberal plant, sent here on a mission to make conservatives look like drooling imbeciles?

Sadly, I think you really are as dimwitted as you sound. As keeps being demonstrating here over and over, most deniers are rather stupid people. And they cry a lot. What a combo, wimpy and stupid.

Mamooth, this guy is so stupid, it is not worth the key strokes to argue with him....her....it.

and yet he's ten times smarter than you or tooth. I love it. what is it that is wrong in his statement? So where does the cold in the northeast come from son?

 

[mamooth]

If you raise the temperature of a house from 69 degrees to 75 degrees, will the house go up all over the house, or just in some areas? How can temperatures above 32 degrees(Ice melt) cause temperatures below 32 degrees hundreds of miles south? Because you liberals are dumber than a box of rocks, or left wing religious fanatical zelots, who cant come to grips that your whole life is a lie, and wont remove yourselves from the Earth, reducing the CO2 footprint , thus saving the planet. See how moronic you are?

It was 63F in Greenland yesterday, dumbass.

Hence, your insanely stupid theory is decisively refuted by the real world. Same old same old.

And damn, you're stupid.

Seriously, you need to wear a helmet when you leave the house, to protect you when you walk into tree and utility poles.

And the other deniers here would like you to stop posting, because you're embarrassing them. Except for jc, who is at an intellectual level similar to yours.