Why Science Accepts Anthropogenic Global Warming and Tells Us We Need to Act

On-topic posts are about 1 in 100 around here. I was just wondering what made you decide to post that here. I can't say I care that much. I've been miles off topic myself.

Trump's comments have always been simplistic, even when they were intelligible. These days, they've become simplistic AND unintellligible. I don't know how many voters he's gonna pull in with that sort of tactic. I'd thought it was "Keep It Simple, Stupid" not "Keep It Simple & Stupid"
Of course it's the former, fwiw.

I'm telling you, that which you've observed on Trump's method has been lethal to his opponents. But the reason for his success hasn't been understood. So now you know!

And fwiw, this has survived long enough on the forum for everybody else to know now!

It won't be reflected back until tomorrow most likely, if at all.
 
The Earth is 58F (33.2C) degrees warmer than it would be without the greenhouse effect. CO2 is solely responsible for one-third of that warming and we have now increased it's level in Earth's atmosphere by 50%.
You do not see convincing documentation of such from you.
I learned long ago your agenda discounts you objective honesty.
 
You do not see convincing documentation of such from you.
GOOGLE AI
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the Earth's surface by trapping the Sun's heat in the atmosphere. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be about -18°C (-0.4°F), but the greenhouse effect raises it to about 15°C (59°F) on average. This process allows life on Earth to exist.
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and some artificial chemicals, absorb and re-radiate some of the Sun's energy that reaches the Earth's atmosphere. This energy warms the atmosphere and the surface of the Earth. The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface is sometimes called “back radiation” and is equivalent to 100% of the incoming solar energy.
However, human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, have disrupted the Earth's energy balance by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. According to the IPCC's 2007 report, Earth's average surface temperatures have risen about 0.74°C (1.33°F) during the past 100 years, and most of that increase is likely due to human activities.






I learned long ago your agenda discounts you objective honesty.
And what might you believe my agenda to be?
 
GOOGLE AI
The greenhouse effect is a natural process that warms the Earth's surface by trapping the Sun's heat in the atmosphere. Without the greenhouse effect, the Earth's average surface temperature would be about -18°C (-0.4°F), but the greenhouse effect raises it to about 15°C (59°F) on average. This process allows life on Earth to exist.
Greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone, and some artificial chemicals, absorb and re-radiate some of the Sun's energy that reaches the Earth's atmosphere. This energy warms the atmosphere and the surface of the Earth. The amount of heat radiated from the atmosphere to the surface is sometimes called “back radiation” and is equivalent to 100% of the incoming solar energy.
However, human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, have disrupted the Earth's energy balance by releasing greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. According to the IPCC's 2007 report, Earth's average surface temperatures have risen about 0.74°C (1.33°F) during the past 100 years, and most of that increase is likely due to human activities.







And what might you believe my agenda to be?
Back in #32;
" Your interest and agenda is to used falsified "science" as a political tool to advance further marxism-socialism towards global tyranny and destroy free enterprise and capitalism.

Repeat. If you really believed this crap you would personally stop emitting any CO2.

You are a phony and charlatan. "

The purple highlight above in the quote of your posts shows just one point of concern. "likely" is far from a certainty!

BTW, you are still here creating the "problem and crisis" you shill for. Not much credibility there on your part.
If everyone who thinks human caused CO2 is the major to sole cause of global warming "crisis" were to do their part and stop emitting CO2, the "crisis" would go away. ;)
 
Back in #32;
" Your interest and agenda is to used falsified "science" as a political tool to advance further marxism-socialism towards global tyranny and destroy free enterprise and capitalism.
#32 is your post. Quoting yourself as a reference just doesn't work whizzo. EMH does it. Don't do what EMH does.
Repeat. If you really believed this crap you would personally stop emitting any CO2.
This was the post for which I called you an idiot. I'm afraid nothing has changed.
You are a phony and charlatan. "
Why? Do you think I am failing to do something I have urged you or others here to do?
he purple highlight above in the quote of your posts shows just one point of concern. "likely" is far from a certainty!
Surely you have seen me note "there is no such thing as a proof in the natural sciences". I have said that dozens of times here because people who really don't know even basic science are constantly demanding proof. Like you just did.
BTW, you are still here creating the "problem and crisis" you shill for. Not much credibility there on your part.
I'm afraid I don't know what you're talking about.
If everyone who thinks human caused CO2 is the major to sole cause of global warming "crisis" were to do their part and stop emitting CO2, the "crisis" would go away. ;)
If EVERYONE did what those who are concerned about CO2 emissions do, the crisis would be in a much more manageable state. No matter what we do now, we still have 175 years of CO2 emissions to deal with.
 
We do need to act.

We need to get a clue.

We need an honest DOJ and FBI to prosecute the Co2 FRAUD.

The Co2 FRAUD is the enemy of America and the actual environment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top