BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
I must admit a touch of schadenfreude watching conservatives deal with the death of Bin Laden. The simple fact is this: Unlike Bush II, Obama made this a priority, found him, and ordered the SEAL team to kill him. Done and done.
Do the SEALs deserve the lion's share of the credit? Of course. They risked their lives, not Obama. Still, it was Obama's decision and a risky one at that. If the raid had failed, the US would have looked mighty foolish and inept. (That wouldn't be fair but that's opinion for you.) I wouldn't call Obama brave for this decision but it wasn't an easy one to make either. Yet he exercised leadership and ordered the raid.
It's not that giving Obama credit for making the decision detracts from the credit rightfully due to SEALs and intelligence operatives. It's just that this decision breaks the conservative narrative and they cannot handle it.
Obama would not have done a damned thing without the Patriot Act, ALL of the work the Military including what the SEALs did under Bush, and of course the Intelligence Community's work that prior to Obama the Left HAMMERED...
Including Obama.
If you are Suggesting that Bush wasn't looking for Obama at all or that he would not have done anything when Actionable Intel was had...
Well... Then you are a Pure Fuckstain.
The only Difference between Bush and Obama is that Bush didn't take Credit for what the Military did.
Obama does.
He Sucks for it.
peace...
Bush didn't take credit for what the military did?
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Good one.