Seattle man starts using women's locker room

[Blackrook]

I applaud this man for proving how absurd liberalism has become. Also, there is no requirement that he prove himself to be transgender. There is no way to prove it because the liberals have made it clear that a man can call himself a woman even without a sex change operation.

I think men in Washington should organize and enter women's rooms all over the state until the stupid liberal voters of Washington get the point.

This issue alone could turn Washington into a red state.

 

[hadit]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

I guess that might be one solution, but I;m sure there is a better one. Nobody said writing good laws was easy, but they claimed they could do it when they asked to be elected. Now they need to show us that skill they claimed.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

Then the loony trannys would scream discrimination

 

[Blackrook]

Liberals can't defend this. Even the idiots on this forum are calling for this law to be reversed. When enough normal people figure out that unisex bathrooms are on the liberal agenda, you will see a mass exodus of normal people from the Democrat party. That will leave the Democrats with the tranny vote, and not much else.

 

[hadit]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

I guess that might be one solution, but I;m sure there is a better one. Nobody said writing good laws was easy, but they claimed they could do it when they asked to be elected. Now they need to show us that skill they claimed.

What better way is there? You have two rooms in which people get naked and some of those people are children. I guess you could set times and no transgenders allowed in either during the time most children would be in there, but that gets complicated too. I can also guarantee that there would not be many, if any, women in the womens' room during transgender hours. It wouldn't work.

 

[hadit]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

Then the loony trannys would scream discrimination

Yes they would.

 

[martybegan]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

 

[martybegan]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

I guess that might be one solution, but I;m sure there is a better one. Nobody said writing good laws was easy, but they claimed they could do it when they asked to be elected. Now they need to show us that skill they claimed.

There is nothing good about this law. The solution is simple, if you still got your twig and berries, use the men's room. If you have gone through the surgery, use the women's room. Or places can voluntarily set up non gender specific third locker rooms if they so choose.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

Simple solution, but it costs more. Put up a non-gender specific locker room for adults only. I wonder how many women would use it.

I guess that might be one solution, but I;m sure there is a better one. Nobody said writing good laws was easy, but they claimed they could do it when they asked to be elected. Now they need to show us that skill they claimed.

What better way is there? You have two rooms in which people get naked and some of those people are children. I guess you could set times and no transgenders allowed in either during the time most children would be in there, but that gets complicated too. I can also guarantee that there would not be many, if any, women in the womens' room during transgender hours. It wouldn't work.

I have no idea what better way might be available. Fortunately, anonymous people on the interwebs aren't responsible to determine that. We elected people to make those decisions, so now, they need to do their job.

 

[Blackrook]

This is an issue where liberals and Democrats have finally gone too far. Once women realize that the liberals are the ones pushing this, except massive defections of women to conservatism and the Republican Party.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

I would be doing my changing in the bathroom stall if I was in a situation like this one which actually would be okay with me. I don't mind changing my clothes there, but of course that is just me.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

P.S. Males and females to me should still remain separate though.

 

[Blackrook]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.

BULLDOG, just admit that your liberal agenda has now led to a result that a man who may or may not be a pedophile now has access to the women's room and can watch little girls taking off their clothes.

 

[BULLDOG]

So, they need to refine the law to prevent lecherous actions. Just because the law was poorly written doesn't mean it can't be changed to reflect the intended goal.

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.

BULLDOG, just admit that your liberal agenda has now led to a result that a man who may or may not be a pedophile now has access to the women's room and can watch little girls taking off their clothes.

No. I'm saying a law was poorly written.

 

[ScienceRocks]

What happened to all the whining about liberty and freedom? Oh'yesss, big old government needs to be the hand of jesus christ in cases like this.

If people want to be the other gender. Who the fuck cares?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What happened to all the whining about liberty and freedom? Oh'yesss, big old government needs to be the hand of jesus christ in cases like this.

If people want to be the other gender. Who the fuck cares?

You have a closet full of dresses don't you?

 

[Blackrook]

Protecting young girls comes before a man's need to think he's a woman for a day. Fact.

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.

BULLDOG, just admit that your liberal agenda has now led to a result that a man who may or may not be a pedophile now has access to the women's room and can watch little girls taking off their clothes.

No. I'm saying a law was poorly written.

BULLDOG, the law was written exactly as intended. The liberals who run Washington state wanted to give men access to women's rooms and so they passed a law making that legal. BULLDOG, since you are a liberal and back it's agenda, this situation is entirely your fault. It is your fault that pedophile men will now be allowed to watch little girls take showers and upload their photos to kiddie porn websites.

 

[Blackrook]

What happened to all the whining about liberty and freedom? Oh'yesss, big old government needs to be the hand of jesus christ in cases like this.

If people want to be the other gender. Who the fuck cares?

Women care. Liberals have finally gone off the deep end making a law that stomps all over women to please a much smaller number of transgenders. Women will now be rethinking and will realize that conservatives were right all along to oppose liberals' radical agenda.

 

[BULLDOG]

Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.

You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.

My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?

I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.

BULLDOG, just admit that your liberal agenda has now led to a result that a man who may or may not be a pedophile now has access to the women's room and can watch little girls taking off their clothes.

No. I'm saying a law was poorly written.

BULLDOG, the law was written exactly as intended. The liberals who run Washington state wanted to give men access to women's rooms and so they passed a law making that legal. BULLDOG, since you are a liberal and back it's agenda, this situation is entirely your fault. It is your fault that pedophile men will now be allowed to watch little girls take showers and upload their photos to kiddie porn websites.

You're funny. Stupid, but funny.