Of course. It's not a matter of deciding to protect the rights of either transgender or the girls, but not both. It's a matter of protecting both. I fully support LGBT rights, but this law should be rescinded until it is fixed.
You treat this as a non-zero sum game, but in each instance there is a good chance that there are people on both sides who will be uncomfortable, either with the man using the women's locker room, or the man (who thinks he is a woman) being denied access and being told to use the men's locker room.
My question is, why does his discomfort outweigh the women's/girl's discomfort?
I don't think it has to be either/or . If no solution is forthcoming, the children have to be protected at all costs, but I;m not sure we are at that point yet.
It has to be one or the other, someone is gonna have either their feelings hurt, or going to feel uncomfortable in the situation.
That's the way it stands now, but I'm not ready to say something better can be done. No, I don't know what that something better is, but there are a lot of smart people around, and I'm willing to see what they might have to say.
The only solution that lets guys with their twig and berries still on use the ladies room is to somehow make the women no longer uncomfortable with that situation. Short of "re-education" or brainwashing, good luck with that.
The solution is you use the locker room your parts dictate, or places start adding ????? locker rooms that anyone can use as a 3rd option.
Yeah, and those third rooms will go largely unused. We are bending over backwards to placate 1% of the general population, if that. With all the legitimate needs we should be addressing, let's just waste funds on shit like this.