Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Suurreee she's not.....
Nope, I'm a moderate. I watch the republicans and democrats make fools of themselves. The two most corrupt parties in the history of our nation.
A moderate is a person too chickenshit to admit they are a liberal.
Oh, a classic error on your part. Democrat and Republican are names of political parties.
Liberal and conservative are ideologies.
"Moderate" is nothing.
Then "job-creators" is quite a misnomer.McD has a price ceiling ... the price at which sales and profits suffer. Therefore they must operate efficiently which means constantly adapting. Sometimes jobs are lost. McD's mission is not to provide jobs for society but rather profits for it's shareholders or in the case of franchises, the owners.
No, it's not. They create jobs by doing what SAYIT said, pursuing profit.
Government creates no jobs ever because it creates no value. The people government hires are paid through money taken out of the economy and for every government job created, more than one private sector job is destroyed.
THERE will always be restaurants who have waitstaff to serve customers this is not the issueAfter what that gay waiter done to that couple, I can't say I much blame them for this, but I always think it is a mistake to blame a whole group (waiters in general), otherwise if changes are to be based upon a minority of incidents that may take place in a whole industry.really i dont ever order a waiter much prefer a hamburgerA waiter is part of the reason people go out to eat.
Me and my family, well we love having a waiter or waitress serve us, and if they do a wonderful job, we will tip them well. Machines to take this over ? FAILURE Is all I see in that situation. Have people lost their minds anymore when it comes to knowing how to operate a great business or is it that the PC error or era is ushering in all these changes found now, and all in defense of ?
Being in the minority means being in the minority.Yes, when a minority is being taxed by the majority who are not, that tax on the minority is most certainly tyranny of the majority over the minority who is thus left without representation to be be fleeced by the mob.HUH? The Boston Tea Party had nothing to do with producers or traders.
The Tea Party was a protest of government.
Taxation without representation.
Which brings us to the 25K dollar question...
What happens when the majority votes for someone who raises taxes?
Is that Taxation Without Representation?
Not a fact. The Tea Party participants were small merchants who were victims of the East India Company's monopoly and tax advantage.
It was the equivalent of an OWS demonstration, or an employee strike.
We didn't revolt over taxaction without representation. We revolted over unfair business practices.
By law we're adding the feature that insurance companies can't drop you when you get sick and the feature that you can get insured even if you have a preexisting condition. We're also adding the feature that you can have health care coverage even if you are poor.Not true. Prices for health care procedures fall all the time due to market success and competitive pressure. The issue is all the "help" we are getting from our government that directly and indirectly result in price increases.
I have yet to meet anyone whose health care premiums have not been skyrocketing since the mid 2000s.
Physicians bill according to the IDC{9}{10} schedule and whatever loss they take they write off at years end.
Correct, we have been getting more and more "help" from our government. As a matter of fact the amount of help we are getting appears to be skyrocketing right along with the price.
Then "job-creators" is quite a misnomer.
No, it's not. They create jobs by doing what SAYIT said, pursuing profit.
Government creates no jobs ever because it creates no value. The people government hires are paid through money taken out of the economy and for every government job created, more than one private sector job is destroyed.
Government doesn't create jobs? Then why do localities freak out when there's a chance they might lose their military base, or their defense plant?
Not a fact. The Tea Party participants were small merchants who were victims of the East India Company's monopoly and tax advantage.
It was the equivalent of an OWS demonstration, or an employee strike.
We didn't revolt over taxaction without representation. We revolted over unfair business practices.
Bam, you just slipped and fell flat on your face. Wow, that must have hurt. Note in the red, you just showed the problem was not "business practices," it was government. Government gave them the monopolies and the tax advantages. And your solution is to make government stronger. Wow, that's a tough shot you just gave yourself, it's gotta hurt. You might want to sit down a while.
Note this is like McDonalds, government is driving them to automate by artificially inflating labor costs. And again, your solution is to make government stronger. Maybe you should start thinking logically.
Ronald Reagan: Government is not the solution, government is the problem...
Being in the minority means being in the minority.Yes, when a minority is being taxed by the majority who are not, that tax on the minority is most certainly tyranny of the majority over the minority who is thus left without representation to be be fleeced by the mob.Which brings us to the 25K dollar question...
What happens when the majority votes for someone who raises taxes?
Is that Taxation Without Representation?
Being without representation means being without representation.
Does that help?
If Apple paid those taxes to England, and their monopoly here crushed US businesses, that would make sense.
I disagree here on your McD example. There has been a growing argument for teller automation regardless of wages.Not a fact. The Tea Party participants were small merchants who were victims of the East India Company's monopoly and tax advantage.
It was the equivalent of an OWS demonstration, or an employee strike.
We didn't revolt over taxaction without representation. We revolted over unfair business practices.
Bam, you just slipped and fell flat on your face. Wow, that must have hurt. Note in the red, you just showed the problem was not "business practices," it was government. Government gave them the monopolies and the tax advantages. And your solution is to make government stronger. Wow, that's a tough shot you just gave yourself, it's gotta hurt. You might want to sit down a while.
Note this is like McDonalds, government is driving them to automate by artificially inflating labor costs. And again, your solution is to make government stronger. Maybe you should start thinking logically.
Ronald Reagan: Government is not the solution, government is the problem...
I don't accept this analogy.Being in the minority means being in the minority.Yes, when a minority is being taxed by the majority who are not, that tax on the minority is most certainly tyranny of the majority over the minority who is thus left without representation to be be fleeced by the mob.
Being without representation means being without representation.
Does that help?
Whether the mob enjoys what they do to a minority group or not, when the girl says rape it's not consensual. Does that help? What good is "supposed" representation when the guy supposedly representing you is slapping you in the face and raping you repeatedly. You call it representation I call it rape by the mob.
I wonder how all those machines will stand up against the next invading army ? No new babies or a new people are to be generated in all of this thinking, and it is all due to a wanting for a robotic world now? The incentive will be taken away by greed that is keeping the family unit from thriving, and also to remain healthy in this nation. This kind of thinking of yours will only open the doors finally to a weakened and dumb down nation in the end. It will be one that will be exposed to the likes of China or others who are eye balling this type of downward spiral, and probably thinking that this nation is now in it's death throws. If they do decide to invade someday, maybe by then you all will have those robots that you keep talking about so much to protect you from the mean ole nasty humans, especially the ones you feared right here in your own America, and for whom wanted just to share your world with you, but you chose to hate them instead. Hey you went there, and so did I.Yep--they certainly won't need to pay for a machine's medical insurance.
By law we're adding the feature that insurance companies can't drop you when you get sick and the feature that you can get insured even if you have a preexisting condition. We're also adding the feature that you can have health care coverage even if you are poor.I have yet to meet anyone whose health care premiums have not been skyrocketing since the mid 2000s.
Physicians bill according to the IDC{9}{10} schedule and whatever loss they take they write off at years end.
Correct, we have been getting more and more "help" from our government. As a matter of fact the amount of help we are getting appears to be skyrocketing right along with the price.
Lets remember that EVERY other first world nation has these features, yet spends far less than we do on health care. And, they still outperform us in significant areas.
I don't accept this analogy.Being in the minority means being in the minority.
Being without representation means being without representation.
Does that help?
Whether the mob enjoys what they do to a minority group or not, when the girl says rape it's not consensual. Does that help? What good is "supposed" representation when the guy supposedly representing you is slapping you in the face and raping you repeatedly. You call it representation I call it rape by the mob.
It would be better if we talked about business and government.
You got the first one almost right.No....Incorporation exists for a number of reasons.Actually, corporations were created to protect against liability for damage.
While what you say may be true, the single minded pursuit of wealth doesn't require incorporation.
1. To protect the officer's or board member's PERSONAL assets from liability
2. To sell stock in the company
3. To permit stock holders to have a say in which the way the company operates. Gives shareholders a say by vote or proxy.
A more in depth explanation...Articles of Incorporation | Nolo.com
The protection of a corporation was created to shield anyone with an interest in the company including share holders and employees, not just officers. Plus, we clearly see cases today where corporate officers don't go to jail even if the decisions they made would result in jail time were they to do the crime as a private citizen - so it covers more than assets.
While making public offerings has restrictions, any number of people can put money together and take actions without incorporating using any form of decision making they want - be it a single person, magic 8-ball or whatever. And, they can let people buy in or sell out.
Not a fact. The Tea Party participants were small merchants who were victims of the East India Company's monopoly and tax advantage.
It was the equivalent of an OWS demonstration, or an employee strike.
We didn't revolt over taxaction without representation. We revolted over unfair business practices.
Bam, you just slipped and fell flat on your face. Wow, that must have hurt. Note in the red, you just showed the problem was not "business practices," it was government. Government gave them the monopolies and the tax advantages. And your solution is to make government stronger. Wow, that's a tough shot you just gave yourself, it's gotta hurt. You might want to sit down a while.
Note this is like McDonalds, government is driving them to automate by artificially inflating labor costs. And again, your solution is to make government stronger. Maybe you should start thinking logically.
Ronald Reagan: Government is not the solution, government is the problem...
I believe I'm up to the task, but let me get in for the night, and off this iPhone. Later!
I disagree here on your McD example. There has been a growing argument for teller automation regardless of wages.Not a fact. The Tea Party participants were small merchants who were victims of the East India Company's monopoly and tax advantage.
It was the equivalent of an OWS demonstration, or an employee strike.
We didn't revolt over taxaction without representation. We revolted over unfair business practices.
Bam, you just slipped and fell flat on your face. Wow, that must have hurt. Note in the red, you just showed the problem was not "business practices," it was government. Government gave them the monopolies and the tax advantages. And your solution is to make government stronger. Wow, that's a tough shot you just gave yourself, it's gotta hurt. You might want to sit down a while.
Note this is like McDonalds, government is driving them to automate by artificially inflating labor costs. And again, your solution is to make government stronger. Maybe you should start thinking logically.
Ronald Reagan: Government is not the solution, government is the problem...
We see the same thing in grocery stores. People are getting good at doing the check-out job for themselves and machines are getting cheaper and easier to use. You can buy a grocery store self serve checkout stand for $50K, complete with bar code scanning, large inventory searching and two automatic scales (weighing each product and the bag of purchased goods). Touch screen info kiosks cost between $5K and $10K.
If a McD shop can save a few thousand employee hours per year by buying a machine, they can afford to pay some money for that machine even at today's minimum wages.
If Apple paid those taxes to England, and their monopoly here crushed US businesses, that would make sense.
Does Ireland count?
.
