Seized tapes record Donald talking with Cohen about Karen McDougal payoff.

Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?

I am pretty sure Putin probably blackmailed Cohen to record these conversations. He might have even provided the equipment.
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
Trump requested the meeting be recorded this is just the latest Media BS get Trump crap that the American people are quickly tiring of....
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
Trump requested the meeting be recorded this is just the latest Media BS get Trump crap that the American people are quickly tiring of....

Yeah, it's like a rotation of crap that keeps circling around. Trump Russia Hoax... then Celebrity Trump Gossip. Then it's Trump hates this and that. Next week it'll be Trump punted a dog scandal. All thanks to Fake News.
 
I am not sure on this, but if Trump used this payment as a loan from Cohen and did not report it on his taxes then it could be a crime. I said could be, but I am no tax expert
It would be a tax violation and he would be given an opportunity to make up any difference....
If he refused then he would be committing a crime....


Thank you sir, did not know that.
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
Trump requested the meeting be recorded this is just the latest Media BS get Trump crap that the American people are quickly tiring of....

So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
if the FBI also has this taping, which it is being reported like they do.... then it was determined by a magistrate that reviewed the recording, to not have attorney client privilege.... it was a conversation between Trump and 'his fixer' and not between Trump and his attorney....

or the tape is no longer attorney client privilege because some sort of criminality was being discussed?

the whole thing is just crazy crazy?????!!!!!!
 
So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
Trump is heard on the tape telling Cohen to record the meeting and if he has to make a payment to use a check not cash...the media has left that part out...
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
if the FBI also has this taping, which it is being reported like they do.... then it was determined by a magistrate that reviewed the recording, to not have attorney client privilege.... it was a conversation between Trump and 'his fixer' and not between Trump and his attorney....

or the tape is no longer attorney client privilege because some sort of criminality was being discussed?

the whole thing is just crazy crazy?????!!!!!!
maybe the money came from his foundation?
 
So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
Trump is heard on the tape telling Cohen to record the meeting and if he has to make a payment to use a check not cash...the media has left that part out...

It was funny. I heard a report that just as the tape was about to stop, a Russian voice was heard in the background. Maybe there was a TV on in the background. But, I find it suspicious.
 
Wouldn't Cohen be liable &/or guilty for making this tape public by violating client/counsel priviledge???

And why in the heck would a lawyer privately tape their clients conversation when it can't be used as evidence?...…..if he didn't already know he planned to burn him with it?
if the FBI also has this taping, which it is being reported like they do.... then it was determined by a magistrate that reviewed the recording, to not have attorney client privilege.... it was a conversation between Trump and 'his fixer' and not between Trump and his attorney....

or the tape is no longer attorney client privilege because some sort of criminality was being discussed?

the whole thing is just crazy crazy?????!!!!!!

So you don't know either?

Even if the FBI has the tape.....a conversation between Trump & Cohen is client priviledge and would not be made public......beyond those that needed to know, at this early stage.
 
So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
Trump is heard on the tape telling Cohen to record the meeting and if he has to make a payment to use a check not cash...the media has left that part out...
I heard the part of use check not cash but not trump telling him to record the meeting
 
So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
Trump is heard on the tape telling Cohen to record the meeting and if he has to make a payment to use a check not cash...the media has left that part out...

So where is that part of the tape?
 
So how do you know that Trump requested it to be recorded, if all sources say it was done by Cohen in secret? Not trying to be argumentative, just curious
Trump is heard on the tape telling Cohen to record the meeting and if he has to make a payment to use a check not cash...the media has left that part out...
Yes, that really makes the payment of hush money to his mistress much more tasteful.
 
You think Trump does that and Bill doesn't?

Do I think Trump does what? Rape women?

Yes, you clearly believe that there is some substantial difference in them. . . . Are you saying one is worse than the other, and which one?

WTF are you even talking about? Good grief. I am talking about Clinton raping and sexually assaulting women is different from consent. Yes there is a substantial difference in Clinton and Trump.
Yes there is a substantial difference in Clinton and Trump.
The 22 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct
It's up to 22 now? Name one that is half way credible.

Better yet, you go through the list and explain why each one is not credible.
 

Forum List

Back
Top