Seminal Question: Should we support Mueller's Investigation?

[Wry Catcher]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

 

[2aguy]

Mueller was appointed without the appropriate trigger of an independent counsel......there was no crime when he was appointed therefore he should not have been appointed.....then, considering he is good friends with comey and the rest of the conspirators...no, he should not have our support....

 

[gipper]

Sanctions against Russia....WTF! Why do leftists want WWIII?

Where are leftists on Trump expanding the defense budget, which is already absurdly bloated and rampant with waste? They apparently back it, as they backed his stupid missile attack on Syria.

When did liberals and leftists become warmongers? I guess the Clinton's have really fucked them up. They have all become Neolibs just like Neocons.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Sanctions against Russia....WTF! Why do leftists want WWIII?

Where are leftists on Trump expanding the defense budget, which is already absurdly bloated and rampant with waste? They apparently back it, as they backed his stupid missile attack on Syria.

When did liberals and leftists become warmongers? I guess the Clinton's have really fucked them up. They have all become Neolibs just like Neocons.

WW1, WW2, Vietnam.

 

[gipper]

Sanctions against Russia....WTF! Why do leftists want WWIII?

Where are leftists on Trump expanding the defense budget, which is already absurdly bloated and rampant with waste? They apparently back it, as they backed his stupid missile attack on Syria.

When did liberals and leftists become warmongers? I guess the Clinton's have really fucked them up. They have all become Neolibs just like Neocons.

WW1, WW2, Vietnam.

Well...Wilson, FDR, and LBJ were not liberals. They were frauds just like Obama.

 

[The Original Tree]

8 people have lost their jobs at the DOJ, FBI and on Mueller’s witch hunt team over Bias and Corruption!

This thing is already over dumbass.

You just can’t see the writing on the Wall!

 

[bripat9643]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

Failure to implement a Democrat policy goal is not a crime, douchebag.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Sanctions against Russia....WTF! Why do leftists want WWIII?

Where are leftists on Trump expanding the defense budget, which is already absurdly bloated and rampant with waste? They apparently back it, as they backed his stupid missile attack on Syria.

When did liberals and leftists become warmongers? I guess the Clinton's have really fucked them up. They have all become Neolibs just like Neocons.

WW1, WW2, Vietnam.

Well...Wilson, FDR, and LBJ were not liberals. They were frauds just like Obama.

They were frauds just like O. They all supported war.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Nope. That time has come & gone. Now we seem to be on a fishing expedition except there are no fish or poles

 

[WillowTree]

Not any more!

 

[tigerred59]

The GOP spent 8 years and counting, investigating Hillary and this mop did nothing to endanger this nation nor its democratic process...Trump on the other hand has under mind every single moray we have in place to save his white ass from prosecution with the support of bible toting christian conservatives. 8 years of investigating Hillary and the GOP won't even allow 1 year for this monster bitch

 

[cutter]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

Why should we support his investigation into collusion whet collusion isn’t even a crime. Lets just call the investigation a liberal attempt to overthrow our duly elected President.

 

[DGS49]

No rational person opposes this investigation into whether the Trump campaign colluded with operatives of the Russian governent to defeat HRC. Even Donald Trump supports it.

But an endless fishing expedition that is intended to keep the President under a cloud for as long as possible? No.

And I think the general public is starting to see this for what it is, despite the endless propaganda from the MSM.

 

[monkrules]

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress.

​

And just how to you expect trump to impose more sanctions?

Hell, trump can barely breathe, the way Putin keeps him face down over his desk.

 

[WillowTree]

Where is the evidence? Got any yet?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

Well, today President Trump flipped once again. After claiming the Russian interference didn't exist and was a witch hunt, today he claimed the interference began in 2014.

Typical of Trump! Flip and Flop. The man is an empty suit.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

Why should we support his investigation into collusion whet collusion isn’t even a crime. Lets just call the investigation a liberal attempt to overthrow our duly elected President.

Conspiracy is a crime.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

Funny Russia did no harm to us Hillary and the DNC did.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Consider this:

Consciousness of Guilt Law and Legal Definition. Evidentiary rules allow a prosecutor to introduce testimony that tends to show that the defendants actions prove he knew he was guilty (at least of something).
​

One would think, that the President of the United States, who has taken the oath of office, to wit:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of
President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve,
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
​

would welcome an investigation into an attack on our most basic principles, ordained and established in the Constitution of the United States, i.e. our elections.

[My opinion] His behavior is not up to par in my estimation, and in fact even today he refused to impose the sanctions against Russia voted for by the Congress. I fully support the Special Prosecutor in his mandate to find any and all persons if they have aided and abetted Russia's attack on democracy in America, and see them brought to justice.

​

A president would not welcome such an investigation, however, that could undermine the legitimacy of his presidency, exposing an effort to obstruct justice to protect members of that administration from the investigation.

 

[Doc1]

Sanctions against Russia....WTF! Why do leftists want WWIII?

Where are leftists on Trump expanding the defense budget, which is already absurdly bloated and rampant with waste? They apparently back it, as they backed his stupid missile attack on Syria.

When did liberals and leftists become warmongers? I guess the Clinton's have really fucked them up. They have all become Neolibs just like Neocons.

Because they don't have to fight it.