Senator Grassley appears to be preparing to bust the frame-up of General Flynn

Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
His son was threatened. I guess this country isn't what it used to be if the FBI is getting guilty pleas by threatening the family of witnesses.

And the left says torture doesn't work. Of course it does. Just look at General Flynn.
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.


giphy.gif

Oh stop it. Turkey is not a real country and a foreign agent is just a deep state nickname the libs fife to true patriots.....

Are you drunk?
 
Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.

pretend you can read ---

Demand for Mueller 'scope' memo threatens principles of proper DOJ oversight
The author is an Obama flunky.


Elliot Mincberg was General Deputy Assistant Secretary for of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2011 to 2014.
Enough said.
 
Interesting. The Deep State "republicans" are such fucking douchebags who know about the Obama/Crooked Hillary attack on our democracy, but stay silent...usually.

Traitor McCain could actually redeem himself if he came clean and told the truth for once as Yahweh destroys his small brain.
1kings 20:11
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
His son was threatened. I guess this country isn't what it used to be if the FBI is getting guilty pleas by threatening the family of witnesses.

And the left says torture doesn't work. Of course it does. Just look at General Flynn.
Threatening? Your moron in the WH sent some one to threaten his porn star
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.

In the past, Generals told panty wastes like Trump to go fuck themselves instead of lying for them
 
The deep state coup plotters are busted! Mewler's witch hunt is crumbling around him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...up_of_general_flynn.html#.Wvc-q3opUfk.twitter

But in keeping with Grassley's style, which has so often misled his opponents into overconfidence, you have to read between the lines to see where he is heading. The end point: uncovering the plot to frame General Flynn for lying to the FBI, including likely criminal acts by senior members of the FBI.

[snip]

The killer bombshell is the final paragraph, in which Grassley at long last reveals the name of the other FBI agent present when Peter Strzok interviewed General Flynn about his conversation with Russian ambassador Kislyak and requests an interview with him by committee staff members:

As Sundance of Conservative Tree House points out, "it's likely Chairman Grassley outed the name for a very specific reason."

And what might that reason be? Sundance reminds us of previously released text messages between the lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page:

Regarding the "widely held belief" that Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the FBI agents (Strzok and Pientka) to shape their FBI reports of the interview (FD-302's) to assist a "Flynn lied" narrative…. evidence of that is within the most recent text messages between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok:

[T]he FBI agents who interviewed Lt. General Michael Flynn, "saw nothing that led them to believe [he was] lying." Our own Committee staff's notes indicate that Mr. Comey said the "agents saw no change in his demeanor or tone that would say he was being untruthful." Contrary to his public statements during his current book tour denying any memory of those comments, then-Director Comey led us to believe during that briefing that the agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe he intentionally lied about his conversation with the Ambassador and that the Justice Department was unlikely to prosecute him for false statements made in that interview. In the months since then, the Special Counsel obtained a guilty plea from Lt. General Flynn for that precise alleged conduct.

Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.

In the past, Generals told panty wastes like Trump to go fuck themselves instead of lying for them
Horseshit. Most of the generals who Obama didn't fire were sucking his cock.
 
Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.

In the past, Generals told panty wastes like Trump to go fuck themselves instead of lying for them
Horseshit. Most of the generals who Obama didn't fire were sucking his cock.

You’re the expert on sucking cock...I forgot.

Flynn still pled guilty
 
Plead guilty. Case closed
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.

In the past, Generals told panty wastes like Trump to go fuck themselves instead of lying for them
Horseshit. Most of the generals who Obama didn't fire were sucking his cock.
as trump does likewise with putin's,,,,,and you with trump if he'd give you the chance
 
Not by a mile, dumbass.

I guess they don’t make generals like they used to if he’s pleading guilty to what he didn’t do.
In the past they didn't destroy generals financially by prosecuting them into bankruptcy.

In the past, Generals told panty wastes like Trump to go fuck themselves instead of lying for them
Horseshit. Most of the generals who Obama didn't fire were sucking his cock.
as trump does likewise with putin's,,,,,and you with trump if he'd give you the chance
The problem with your theory is that there is zero evidence for it. However, there is abundant evidence that the generals were sucking Obama's cock. Take all the "green energy" bullshit they were told to implement, for example. Every General in our military thought that was pure quackery, but they did what Obama told them to do. None of them told Obama he was a fucking moron.
 
Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.

pretend you can read ---

Demand for Mueller 'scope' memo threatens principles of proper DOJ oversight
The author is an Obama flunky.


Elliot Mincberg was General Deputy Assistant Secretary for of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2011 to 2014.
Enough said.

so - Trump is a lying bitch.
 
Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.

pretend you can read ---

Demand for Mueller 'scope' memo threatens principles of proper DOJ oversight
The author is an Obama flunky.


Elliot Mincberg was General Deputy Assistant Secretary for of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2011 to 2014.
Enough said.

so - Trump is a lying bitch.
3000+ lies ,,so far and still has more than 2 years to go An all time record breaker will end up in the hall of shame
 
Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.

pretend you can read ---

Demand for Mueller 'scope' memo threatens principles of proper DOJ oversight
The author is an Obama flunky.


Elliot Mincberg was General Deputy Assistant Secretary for of Congressional and Intergovernmental Relations at the Department of Housing and Urban Development from 2011 to 2014.
Enough said.

so - Trump is a lying bitch.
3000+ lies ,,so far and still has more than 2 years to go An all time record breaker will end up in the hall of shame
You'll have to excuse us if we don't accept the Media Matters definition of the word "lie."
 
Grassley isnt on the need to know list - let him want in one hand and pee in the other - he's as irrelevant as the idiots on this board who demand proof .
He's entitled to know, asshole. Congress has oversight authority over the FBI and the DOJ.

The head of the Senate Judiciary doesn't have a "need to know?"

:lmao:

These Stalinists are the dumbest creatures in the known universe.
 

Forum List

Back
Top