Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if only there were some way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and
nuts. There must be some genius out there who can come up with a way
to make a dent in criminal use-----some form of technology. Right now---the
very pixilated donkey is USING the disarmament thing as a populist issue in their HUNGER for votes. -------disarmament of HUMANS is an issue with a long
very shameful history as a tool of control and oppression and enslavement.
THEREFORE I am suspicious of any politician eager to jump on that bandwagon------despite the fact that I despise the BULLET IN THE BRAIN prevalence in
my city
Well MAYBE if assault rifles were banned, the looters wouldn't have that advantage. It is a known, if denied by the RW, that the past assault weapon & clip ban brought a decrease in violent crime. And certainly less mass shootings. What else are they used for? We get a lot of hypothetical musings about the need, but what other than mass shootings are the combat weapons in civilian hands actually used for?YEP them damn looters in Baltimore Furguson st Louis DC just destroyed thingsSenator Graham doesn't have much faith in American moral values, does he? He has more faith in combat-armed looters?Graham is wrong on a lot of things, Red Flag Laws for one, but he explains the need for AR-15 civilian and police rifles really well...
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15
A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to reporters on Friday.
The New York Post:
Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town.
“Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A reporter asked if he meant looters.
“Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home,” Graham responded. “Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street.”
That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift.
Although he can occasionally be a firebrand, Graham is still a United States senator and was flying with the president on Air Force One when asked about this. He remained very decorous and didn't offer the answer that a regular, law-abiding gun owner might.
I sleep with a loaded Beretta on my nightstand and was once asked why.
"Because I (expletive deleted) want to."
That's really the only answer anyone needs in response to being asked why he or she is doing something perfectly legal that isn't harming anyone else.
My dad (may he rest in peace) had a more polite, but still intentionally obnoxious, response when someone once asked him why he slept with a gun next to his bed:
"Where do you keep yours?"
Have I ever had to use a gun for self-defense? Thankfully, no. And I hope I never have to.
I am not, however, obligated to explain to anyone why I would prefer not to be killed.
I live in an area with tornadoes....same concept.... and store owners in democrat cities always have to look out for Black lives matter inspired riots and looting...that is if they don't want their businesses looted then burnt to the ground.....or like New York, having al sharpton inciting a riot that gets your business burnt to the ground...
The AR-15 civilian and police rifle is a nice way to tell democrat looters...move along asshole...
It is a bleeping convenient excuse mouthed by Graham, and if THAT doesn't work, he can always remind you that we may be attacked by anti-tariff Chinese or Martians or Zulu tribesman or crazed Mexican jalapeno growers.
No one can argue that New Orleans immediately post Katrina wasn't dangerous. It was. It was mostly just folks trying not to drown, to get out, but there were drug addicts jonesing and opportunists grabbing what they could to survive--bottled water, food, anything that would float and act as a boat. Survival does things to people. We make sure things don't get to that point any more.
Why do you think the National Guard gets sent to areas about to get hit by hurricanes? It's not just to rescue folks. But all that said, we all know days in advance before a hurricane hits and if you don't value your life more than your flat screen tv, you hit the road and get to safety.
Businesses looted? Do you think they don't have insurance? Is it really necessary to KILL people who want a new laptop or a case of diapers?
I don't know. Sounds like a bunch of Walter Mitty dreamin' to me.
There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A disaster, no power, no cops, no anything, means no looters, he would probably leave if there was a hurricane warning. Also they would be all fighting for their lifes.
You can make up all kinds of excuses, but none are good for having assault weapons or pistols, no matter how hard you try.
So my 7.62 mm Semiautomatic with wood stock is OK because it doesn't fit the definition of "assault" weapon
Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features. Some jurisdictions define revolving cylinder shotguns as assault weapons.
Assault weapon - Wikipedia
There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A disaster, no power, no cops, no anything, means no looters, he would probably leave if there was a hurricane warning. Also they would be all fighting for their lifes.
You can make up all kinds of excuses, but none are good for having assault weapons or pistols, no matter how hard you try.
So my 7.62 mm Semiautomatic with wood stock is OK because it doesn't fit the definition of "assault" weapon
Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features. Some jurisdictions define revolving cylinder shotguns as assault weapons.
Assault weapon - Wikipedia
That is the current definition, yes. What people like you and your ilk did is bastardize the definition in an effort to limit a law abiding citizen's ability to exercise a constitutionally protected right. Prior to the need to change the definition in order to infringe on these rights of law abiding citizens, the widely accepted definition of an assault rifle, the traditional definition of an "assault rifle" was, and should still be, a weapon the military generally uses and has "select fire capabilities," or the capability to switch between semi-automatic or a fully automatic mode.
Nothing that is legally available to the public in the United States meets this definition.
No link to the graph? and there were 17 mass shootings during the assault weapon ban
Gods. The semantic games rightard gun nuts play to deflect from the mass killing capabilities of semi automatic rifles with large interchangeable magazines. Still, I suppose their penis extensions are important to them.My 7.62 mm rifle has none of those other features and would not fit the definition of an assault rifle so it must be OK to use for home defense right?
Graham is wrong on a lot of things, Red Flag Laws for one, but he explains the need for AR-15 civilian and police rifles really well...
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15
A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to reporters on Friday.
The New York Post:
Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town.
“Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A reporter asked if he meant looters.
“Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home,” Graham responded. “Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street.”
That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift.
Although he can occasionally be a firebrand, Graham is still a United States senator and was flying with the president on Air Force One when asked about this. He remained very decorous and didn't offer the answer that a regular, law-abiding gun owner might.
I sleep with a loaded Beretta on my nightstand and was once asked why.
"Because I (expletive deleted) want to."
That's really the only answer anyone needs in response to being asked why he or she is doing something perfectly legal that isn't harming anyone else.
My dad (may he rest in peace) had a more polite, but still intentionally obnoxious, response when someone once asked him why he slept with a gun next to his bed:
"Where do you keep yours?"
Have I ever had to use a gun for self-defense? Thankfully, no. And I hope I never have to.
I am not, however, obligated to explain to anyone why I would prefer not to be killed.
I live in an area with tornadoes....same concept.... and store owners in democrat cities always have to look out for Black lives matter inspired riots and looting...that is if they don't want their businesses looted then burnt to the ground.....or like New York, having al sharpton inciting a riot that gets your business burnt to the ground...
The AR-15 civilian and police rifle is a nice way to tell democrat looters...move along asshole...
FN® Five seveN® Model Semiautomatic Pistols
Originally developed for military and law-enforcement tactical applications, the FN Five-seveN is chambered for the 5.7x28mm cartridge and has an impressive 20+1 capacity. It offers a high-velocity, medium-range, penetrating round in a lightweight, low-recoiling handgun. Weighing up to 30% less than comparably sized 9mm pistols, the Five-seveN is engineered for minimal muzzle jump. Rugged polymer construction with an integrated tactical rail for accessories. Ambidextrous manual safety. Three 20-round magazines included.
- Weighs up to 30% less than comparably sized 9mm pistols
- Rugged polymer construction with integrated tactical rail
- Three 20-round magazines, lockable fitted hard case
Available:
this pistol needs to be outlawed for civilian use.
- Dark Earth frame with blued slide and adjustable rear sight/high-profile front blade sight.
- All black with adjustable rear sight/high-profile front blade sight.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FN® Five seveN® Model Semiautomatic Pistols : Cabela's
Graham needs to understand something.
The American citizen does not need to explain or justify exercising a right.
Not to government.
Not to him.
Not to the left.
For an assault weapon he needs to justify having one, like in the military.
LolDid he whip out his tiny dick and show it to the crowd?
There you go with penis obsession again, are you a little flaky in the head?
How did your mom raise you? Why are you still in your mothers basement?
You do realize he’s gay? Are you an Homophob?
There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A disaster, no power, no cops, no anything, means no looters, he would probably leave if there was a hurricane warning. Also they would be all fighting for their lifes.
You can make up all kinds of excuses, but none are good for having assault weapons or pistols, no matter how hard you try.
So my 7.62 mm Semiautomatic with wood stock is OK because it doesn't fit the definition of "assault" weapon
Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features. Some jurisdictions define revolving cylinder shotguns as assault weapons.
Assault weapon - Wikipedia
That is the current definition, yes. What people like you and your ilk did is bastardize the definition in an effort to limit a law abiding citizen's ability to exercise a constitutionally protected right. Prior to the need to change the definition in order to infringe on these rights of law abiding citizens, the widely accepted definition of an assault rifle, the traditional definition of an "assault rifle" was, and should still be, a weapon the military generally uses and has "select fire capabilities," or the capability to switch between semi-automatic or a fully automatic mode.
Nothing that is legally available to the public in the United States meets this definition.
Hmmm so if the Gov't bans AR-15s how is that infringing on your constitutional right?
There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A disaster, no power, no cops, no anything, means no looters, he would probably leave if there was a hurricane warning. Also they would be all fighting for their lifes.
You can make up all kinds of excuses, but none are good for having assault weapons or pistols, no matter how hard you try.
So my 7.62 mm Semiautomatic with wood stock is OK because it doesn't fit the definition of "assault" weapon
Drawing from federal and state law definitions, the term assault weapon refers primarily to semi-automatic rifles, pistols, and shotguns that are able to accept detachable magazines and possess one or more other features. Some jurisdictions define revolving cylinder shotguns as assault weapons.
Assault weapon - Wikipedia
That is the current definition, yes. What people like you and your ilk did is bastardize the definition in an effort to limit a law abiding citizen's ability to exercise a constitutionally protected right. Prior to the need to change the definition in order to infringe on these rights of law abiding citizens, the widely accepted definition of an assault rifle, the traditional definition of an "assault rifle" was, and should still be, a weapon the military generally uses and has "select fire capabilities," or the capability to switch between semi-automatic or a fully automatic mode.
Nothing that is legally available to the public in the United States meets this definition.
Hmmm so if the Gov't bans AR-15s how is that infringing on your constitutional right?
My parents` home took on 8ft. of water during hurricane Ivan in 2004. There was nothing there to steal. Graham`s just another gun pussy playing the crackers for votes.Graham is wrong on a lot of things, Red Flag Laws for one, but he explains the need for AR-15 civilian and police rifles really well...
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15
A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to reporters on Friday.
The New York Post:
Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town.
“Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A reporter asked if he meant looters.
“Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home,” Graham responded. “Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street.”
That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift.
Although he can occasionally be a firebrand, Graham is still a United States senator and was flying with the president on Air Force One when asked about this. He remained very decorous and didn't offer the answer that a regular, law-abiding gun owner might.
I sleep with a loaded Beretta on my nightstand and was once asked why.
"Because I (expletive deleted) want to."
That's really the only answer anyone needs in response to being asked why he or she is doing something perfectly legal that isn't harming anyone else.
My dad (may he rest in peace) had a more polite, but still intentionally obnoxious, response when someone once asked him why he slept with a gun next to his bed:
"Where do you keep yours?"
Have I ever had to use a gun for self-defense? Thankfully, no. And I hope I never have to.
I am not, however, obligated to explain to anyone why I would prefer not to be killed.
I live in an area with tornadoes....same concept.... and store owners in democrat cities always have to look out for Black lives matter inspired riots and looting...that is if they don't want their businesses looted then burnt to the ground.....or like New York, having al sharpton inciting a riot that gets your business burnt to the ground...
The AR-15 civilian and police rifle is a nice way to tell democrat looters...move along asshole...
Okay Penny, you sold me. I will buy an AR15 this week. Thanks.Graham needs to understand something.
The American citizen does not need to explain or justify exercising a right.
Not to government.
Not to him.
Not to the left.
For an assault weapon he needs to justify having one, like in the military.
Graham is wrong on a lot of things, Red Flag Laws for one, but he explains the need for AR-15 civilian and police rifles really well...
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15
A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to reporters on Friday.
The New York Post:
Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town.
“Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A reporter asked if he meant looters.
“Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home,” Graham responded. “Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street.”
That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift.
Although he can occasionally be a firebrand, Graham is still a United States senator and was flying with the president on Air Force One when asked about this. He remained very decorous and didn't offer the answer that a regular, law-abiding gun owner might.
I sleep with a loaded Beretta on my nightstand and was once asked why.
"Because I (expletive deleted) want to."
That's really the only answer anyone needs in response to being asked why he or she is doing something perfectly legal that isn't harming anyone else.
My dad (may he rest in peace) had a more polite, but still intentionally obnoxious, response when someone once asked him why he slept with a gun next to his bed:
"Where do you keep yours?"
Have I ever had to use a gun for self-defense? Thankfully, no. And I hope I never have to.
I am not, however, obligated to explain to anyone why I would prefer not to be killed.
I live in an area with tornadoes....same concept.... and store owners in democrat cities always have to look out for Black lives matter inspired riots and looting...that is if they don't want their businesses looted then burnt to the ground.....or like New York, having al sharpton inciting a riot that gets your business burnt to the ground...
The AR-15 civilian and police rifle is a nice way to tell democrat looters...move along asshole...
Did he whip out his tiny dick and show it to the crowd?
Yeah! Sure! And butterflies make buttermilk.Well MAYBE if assault rifles were banned, the looters wouldn't have that advantage. It is a known, if denied by the RW, that the past assault weapon & clip ban brought a decrease in violent crime. And certainly less mass shootings. What else are they used for? We get a lot of hypothetical musings about the need, but what other than mass shootings are the combat weapons in civilian hands actually used for?YEP them damn looters in Baltimore Furguson st Louis DC just destroyed thingsSenator Graham doesn't have much faith in American moral values, does he? He has more faith in combat-armed looters?Graham is wrong on a lot of things, Red Flag Laws for one, but he explains the need for AR-15 civilian and police rifles really well...
Lindsey Graham Politely Explains to Idiot Reporters Why He needs an AR-15
A favorite question that the anti-gun crowd likes to ask is "Why does anyone need an AR-15?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has a very practical answer to that, which he offered to reporters on Friday.
The New York Post:
Sen. Lindsey Graham knocked down the idea of banning semi-automatic weapons nearly identical to those used by soldiers on the off chance a hurricane slams into his South Carolina town.
“Here’s a scenario that I think is real: There’s a hurricane, a natural disaster, no power, no cops, no anything,” the Republican lawmaker told reporters aboard Air Force One.
A reporter asked if he meant looters.
“Yeah, people, they’re not going to come to the AR-15 home,” Graham responded. “Well, I think if you show up on the porch with an AR-15, they’ll probably go down the street.”
That's a very sound point. No matter where you live, you can come up with a legitimate argument for owning an AR-15 for self-defense. Of course, no one ever wants to be in a situation where they have to, but the peace of mind is a gift.
Although he can occasionally be a firebrand, Graham is still a United States senator and was flying with the president on Air Force One when asked about this. He remained very decorous and didn't offer the answer that a regular, law-abiding gun owner might.
I sleep with a loaded Beretta on my nightstand and was once asked why.
"Because I (expletive deleted) want to."
That's really the only answer anyone needs in response to being asked why he or she is doing something perfectly legal that isn't harming anyone else.
My dad (may he rest in peace) had a more polite, but still intentionally obnoxious, response when someone once asked him why he slept with a gun next to his bed:
"Where do you keep yours?"
Have I ever had to use a gun for self-defense? Thankfully, no. And I hope I never have to.
I am not, however, obligated to explain to anyone why I would prefer not to be killed.
I live in an area with tornadoes....same concept.... and store owners in democrat cities always have to look out for Black lives matter inspired riots and looting...that is if they don't want their businesses looted then burnt to the ground.....or like New York, having al sharpton inciting a riot that gets your business burnt to the ground...
The AR-15 civilian and police rifle is a nice way to tell democrat looters...move along asshole...
It is a bleeping convenient excuse mouthed by Graham, and if THAT doesn't work, he can always remind you that we may be attacked by anti-tariff Chinese or Martians or Zulu tribesman or crazed Mexican jalapeno growers.
Actual research showed the Assault Weapon Ban didn't lower crime or mass shootings.....there are over 18 million semi-automatic rifles, the majority of them are AR-15s, and those rifles are used for hunting, competition, self defense, and collecting......and none of your business....
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/204431.pdf
The decline in the use of AWs has been due primarily to a reduction in the use of assault pistols (APs), which are used in crime more commonly than assault rifles (ARs). There has not been a clear decline in the use of ARs, though assessments are complicated by the rarity of crimes with these weapons and by substitution of post-ban rifles that are very similar to the banned AR models.
--------
Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement. AWs were rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban.
