Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You forgot to quote the rest of my response which has not been refuted.Wrong. Another answer is that energy (saying "matter" is redundant, please take note) has always existed.There is only one answer. Energy and matter are created from nothing
Hope you're not holding your breath?If you are looking for the cause, you’d have to go back to the first three Chinese dynasties.Have you considered the idea that, instead of these coincidences being due to some magical sky daddy or magical absolute truth...they share similarities because human beings invented them all?I also compared Buddhist teachings with what Jesus taught, and guess what? They are pretty close as well
They worshipped the God of Abraham.
Really? Quick question Ding, do you have a link or two concerning that, so I can read about it myself? I'd never heard of something like that, but I would be interested in learning more if you have links.
So it isn’t possible for energy and matter to have always existed because we don’t see uniform temperatures everywhere. It must be the infinite time thing that is tripping you up.Wrong. Another answer is that energy (saying "matter" is redundant, please take note) has always existed.There is only one answer. Energy and matter are created from nothing
Yep. I first heard about it through a colleague at work who was from China. He shared his slide pack with me.If you are looking for the cause, you’d have to go back to the first three Chinese dynasties.Have you considered the idea that, instead of these coincidences being due to some magical sky daddy or magical absolute truth...they share similarities because human beings invented them all?I also compared Buddhist teachings with what Jesus taught, and guess what? They are pretty close as well
They worshipped the God of Abraham.
Really? Quick question Ding, do you have a link or two concerning that, so I can read about it myself? I'd never heard of something like that, but I would be interested in learning more if you have links.
Most people who aren't looking for understanding will never find it. The Tower of Babel was about an actual historical event; the great migration from Mesopotamia. It explains how the account of Genesis ended up as symbols in the Chinese language. And why the first three Chinese dynasties worshipped ShangDi the creator God. And the references in Tao Te Ching.Hope you're not holding your breath?If you are looking for the cause, you’d have to go back to the first three Chinese dynasties.Have you considered the idea that, instead of these coincidences being due to some magical sky daddy or magical absolute truth...they share similarities because human beings invented them all?I also compared Buddhist teachings with what Jesus taught, and guess what? They are pretty close as well
They worshipped the God of Abraham.
Really? Quick question Ding, do you have a link or two concerning that, so I can read about it myself? I'd never heard of something like that, but I would be interested in learning more if you have links.
Your pride is getting in the way of expanding your mind.Boring tautology sure fits.
Not sure what you think this means. But then again I’m not sure you know what you think it means.
~14 billion years ago space and time were created from nothing. Since that time the universe has expanded and cooled and matter/energy has merely changed form.
For every transaction there is a loss of useable energy. Do this enough times and thermal equilibrium occurs.~14 billion years ago space and time were created from nothing. Since that time the universe has expanded and cooled and matter/energy has merely changed form.
~14 billion years ago ...
the oscillation from energy to matter is cyclical.
No they aren't...ding, why do you shamelessly lie?Cyclical models are dead.
.For every transaction there is a loss of useable energy. Do this enough times and thermal equilibrium occurs.~14 billion years ago space and time were created from nothing. Since that time the universe has expanded and cooled and matter/energy has merely changed form.
~14 billion years ago ...
the oscillation from energy to matter is cyclical.
Cyclical models are dead.
Do this enough times and thermal equilibrium occurs.
They absolutely are dead.No they aren't...ding, why do you shamelessly lie?Cyclical models are dead.
And does not add energy to the system. Which means that as time approaches infinity, the universe approaches thermal equilibrium. Cyclical models cannot avoid this fate..For every transaction there is a loss of useable energy. Do this enough times and thermal equilibrium occurs.~14 billion years ago space and time were created from nothing. Since that time the universe has expanded and cooled and matter/energy has merely changed form.
~14 billion years ago ...
the oscillation from energy to matter is cyclical.
Cyclical models are dead.
Do this enough times and thermal equilibrium occurs.
compaction of either is finite, causing the transition from one to the other.
100% wrong, and you are embarrassing yourself. Ding, I really don't care if you want to make shit up to soothe yourself. I am content to call you a shameless liar, and any child with google can find out for themselves that you are embarrassing yourself.They absolutely are dead.
100% wrong. In fact, the core of literally every single cyclical model is a mathematical solution that eludes this fate. Ding, i think you should probably never ever open your mouth about cosmology again.Which means that as time approaches infinity, the universe approaches thermal equilibrium. Cyclical models cannot avoid this fate.
Go back and address the two posts you skipped. I explained it such that a six year old could follow it.100% wrong, and you are embarrassing yourself. Ding, I really don't care if you want to make shit up to soothe yourself. I am content to call you a shameless liar, and any child with google can find out for themselves that you are embarrassing yourself.They absolutely are dead.
No ding. Masturbate on your own time.Go back and address the two posts you skipped. I explained it such that a six year old could follow it.100% wrong, and you are embarrassing yourself. Ding, I really don't care if you want to make shit up to soothe yourself. I am content to call you a shameless liar, and any child with google can find out for themselves that you are embarrassing yourself.They absolutely are dead.
No they don’t. It isn’t possible for matter / energy to exist forever without equilibrating.100% wrong. In fact, the core of literally every single cyclical model is a mathematical solution that eludes this fate. Ding, i think you should probably never ever open your mouth about cosmology again.Which means that as time approaches infinity, the universe approaches thermal equilibrium. Cyclical models cannot avoid this fate.
