flacaltenn
Diamond Member
This is somewhat inspired by Maxcha's thread, which... instead of arguing the morality (silly word) of homosexuality, we're arguing in what causes it.
Is it genetic, hormonal, or psychological... or possibly a combination of two or three?
From the evidence I have seen, it seems to be pointing towards hormones. There have been specific twin studies over the past few years that examine sets of twins with differing sexual orientations. Each set of twins are genetically identical and have experienced (relatively) uniform environmental settings. If this is true, the "nurture" aspect of psychological development is omitted with just "nature" left... Since it's not genetic (in this instance), then maybe it's hormonal?
Here's what I can say with a definite answer:
By the way, if you're going to make a post in what your opinion is, then please leave links pointing towards evidence that supports your claim.
- Sexual orientation is not a choice.
- It's is not unnatural... seeing that it's a phenomina that occurs in many other species (not just humans).
Admission -- haven't read a lot about the science on this, but I understand a bit about genetics, psychology and hormones at an academic level..
I think it's all three. And I think society misdiagnoses "true gayness" too often.
For example -- the BiSexual folks I've known (one intimately) have very few characteristic traits of "being gay". They don't even seriously accept the proposition of themselves being gay. They have just chosen (yep choice) to behave this way.. Score one for psychological.
Long way from BiSexual choice to gayness. The manners of speaking, gesturing, adaption to specific artistic and created tasks, easy association with same sex partners -- THIS has got to be genetic. There are many ways that genes determine traits. One is by presence, another is by activation.. Presence is the fact that someone INHERITED a gene from a parent. Activation is a chemical/neurological process that is not completely explained.
I believe that gayness could be an activation of genes that are fairly prevalent in populations but not yet identified. Therefore your lineage doesn't have to be heavily involved. Since we see "gayness" in other species, the gene stuff could be carried in all that "junk DNA" that's in common with other mammals.
Suck on this for a minute..
Are People Born Gay? Genetics and Homosexuality
Paul Cameron published a study in 2006 that claimed that the children of homosexual parents expressed a homosexual orientation much more frequently than the general population.39 Although claims of bias were made against the study, another study by Walter Schuum in 2010 confirmed Cameron's results by statistically examining the results of 10 other studies that addressed the question.40 In total, 262 children raised by homosexual parents were included in the analysis. The results showed that 16-57% of such children adopted a homosexual lifestyle. The results were even more striking in daughters of lesbian mothers, 33% to 57% of whom became lesbians themselves. Since homosexuals makeup only ~5% of the population, it is clear that parenting does influence sexual orientation.
YEAH, YEAH.. I KNOW the link sucks. So HERE is the ORIGINAL study that he is referring. So it is real.
Children of homosexuals and transsexuals more a... [J Biosoc Sci. 2006] - PubMed - NCBI
[[After I posted this I realized that although it appears on the NIH website and was published in a respectable journal, the researchers' organization affiliation may make this suspect. I generally don't discount scientific journal articles because of affiliation, but some might. Free speech, free minds, free inquiry, etc, etc]]
So NURTURE seems to win over NATURE in a lot of the studies. But don't count GENES out of it yet..
I've read about hormone activation of genes --- is it POSSIBLE that HORMONES could activate some of those "junk DNA" genes and initiate gayness? Sounds possible. If you go back to the NIH report -- Is it possible that hormone generation due to living with GAY PARENTS enhances the possibilitty of that gene activation? What ELSE might influence the activation?
Could EVERYONE be right? Tune in later --- I think that's the answer. It just MIGHT be ALL THREE....
Lots of questions eh? The science is out there. We'll know soon...
Last edited: