Share The Wealth platform.

Capitalism is the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people. We refer to this group of people as the capitalist class. The majority of people must sell their ability to work in return for a wage or salary (who we refer to as the working class.)

The working class are paid to produce goods and services which are then sold for a profit. The profit is gained by the capitalist class because they can make more money selling what we have produced than we cost to buy on the labour market. In this sense, the working class are exploited by the capitalist class. The capitalists live off the profits they obtain from exploiting the working class whilst reinvesting some of their profits for the further accumulation of wealth.

This is what we mean when we say there are two classes in society. It is a claim based upon simple facts about the society we live in today. This class division is the essential feature of capitalism. It may be popular to talk (usually vaguely) about various other 'classes' existing such as the 'middle class', but it is the two classes defined here that are the key to understanding capitalism.

It may not be exactly clear which class some relatively wealthy people are in. But there is no ambiguity about the status of the vast majority of the world's population. Members of the capitalist class certainly know who they are. And most members of the working class know that they need to work for a wage or salary in order to earn a living (or are dependent upon somebody who does, or depend on state benefits.)

The profit motive

In capitalism, the motive for producing goods and services is to sell them for a profit, not to satisfy people's needs. The products of capitalist production have to find a buyer, of course, but this is only incidental to the main aim of making a profit, of ending up with more money than was originally invested. This is not a theory that we have thought up but a fact you can easily confirm for yourself by reading the financial press. Production is started not by what consumers are prepared to pay for to satisfy their needs but by what the capitalists calculate can be sold at a profit. Those goods may satisfy human needs but those needs will not be met if people do not have sufficient money.

The profit motive is not just the result of greed on behalf of individual capitalists. They do not have a choice about it. The need to make a profit is imposed on capitalists as a condition for not losing their investments and their position as capitalists. Competition with other capitalists forces them to reinvest as much of their profits as they can afford to keep their means and methods of production up to date.

As you will see, we hold that it is the class division and profit motive of capitalism that is at the root of most of the world's problems today, from starvation to war, to alienation and crime. Every aspect of our lives is subordinated to the worst excesses of the drive to make profit. In capitalist society, our real needs will only ever come a poor second to the requirements of profit.
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHK0MhTlt6Y]Why Capitalism Sucks - YouTube[/ame]
 
Simple video for the capitalist retards to understand....don't want to overload your brains.
 
Capitalism is the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people. We refer to this group of people as the capitalist class. .

You have the right to refer to them in any manner you choose.

That does not mean that they are practicing Capitalism or that they are Capitalists. Unless you are speaking in Orwellian.

.
 
Capitalism is the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people. We refer to this group of people as the capitalist class. .

You have the right to refer to them in any manner you choose.

That does not mean that they are practicing Capitalism or that they are Capitalists. Unless you are speaking in Orwellian.

.

Capitalism can't exist if governments are regulating markets derp derp derp
 
How is it owed to you?

If a rich man builds a factory, buys materials with which to make something, and hires workers to work producing it, he has spent a huge sum to start his business. He has taken enormous risk. The line worker has spent days working.

To claim that the owner and the line worker both deserve equal shares is ludicrous.

The hilarious thing about this, is the worker would have quit in a free society if he thought he was worth more to that employer.. But still, the worker signs the agreement and starts work at the job,,
Already went over this. Its blackmail. Either "sign a contract" for shit pay and barely squeak by or don't sign it and starve completely.

They are not getting anywhere near an equal share of what they are producing. They deserve to. Capitalism is on its way out thank goodness!

That's exactly what capitalism is. Stealing labor to get things made and not paying the workers for it. We can split hairs all night long.

"Stealing" means taking something belonging to someone else without their permission. Every employee in a corporation has given his permission for the corporation to use his labor. It's not stealing.

Taxation, on the other hand, clearly is theft.

Already went over the "permission" crap....its either starve on one hand or "sign a contract" and just barely get by and not quite starve but you aren't even close to having it good...literally living paycheck to paycheck and even then not having enough money to pay bills or put gas in the vehicle....while the rich bastards drive 100k cars and 5 million dollar yachts and take 10 million dollar vacations. We need a politician that's for the people by the people. Obama sure ain't it. He is for the corporations and lies to the people saying he is helping them,he does just enough to fool most people...

What is it that they do to "deserve" a bigger share? The business owner puts up the capital, works longer hours, and takes greater risks with his own money. The line worker is paid for every hour he performs his tasks (and usually some hours where he does little or nothing). Why does the line worker deserve more? What does he bring to the table that could not be replaced by automation?
 
There must be assurances that a wealth-share platform elucidates any differentiation between American capitalism and pseudo-socialism.

When Hillary Clinton pushed for pseudo-socialized healthcare, it raised eyebrows, and she received the brunt of the criticism (i.e., "Why is the First Lady running the White House?).

Capitalism, as presented by the great economics theorist Adam Smith, is based on the profitability of competition and how competition can create resource-sharing networks that compete with each other on a macro-scale.

It is difficult to advocate wealth-sharing when all wee see on American TV and now on Facebook are blurbs about the software tycoon Bill Gates. Gates received anti-trust judgments against Microsoft even though his lucrative company was engaged in various forms of consultancy-styled corporate governance.

To win the vote from the masses regarding wealth-sharing, there needs to be more talk about salary-caps, tax incentives, etc. from the perspective of labor pooling (rather than management pooling). How does the average worker feel about companies merging? These seemingly basic questions ironically go to the heart of the matter: the contradictions between wealth-sharing and the dollar-giant American dream.


:eusa_boohoo:


International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


logo-national-farmers-union.png
 
I love that they use the word "Share".

They say "Share" because it sounds so benign and wonderful. But sharing implies it is voluntary.

I share my money when I give to charities, but the IRS takes my money.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: kaz
The key planks of the Share The Wealth platform included:
No person would be allowed to accumulate a personal net worth of more than 300 times the average family fortune, which would limit personal assets to between $5 million and $8 million. A graduated capital levy tax would be assessed on all persons with a net worth exceeding $1 million....

So once job producers earn what they are allowed to earn for the year and quit working, that's going to just do wonderful things for jobs. You really hate people who actually work, don't you?
 
Capitalism is the social system which now exists in all countries of the world. Under this system, the means for producing and distributing goods (the land, factories, technology, transport system etc) are owned by a small minority of people

As opposed to socialism where the means for producing and distribution is controlled by a small number of people leveraging a monopoly of force. Wow, that does sound better.
 

Forum List

Back
Top