SHOCKING: Did Anyone see Joy Reid defend an LGBTQ book about rape and incest against Mom's For Liberty?

[hadit]

And again you dodge the reality that the Bible is wildly inappropriate for under 12s unless the intent is to groom them to be raped.

Is this the intent?

Why are so many conservatives aroused by this brief/painful passage in the book Reid defended?

It seems they're troubled by their own gay and pedophilic impulses.

What do you think?

That you're insanely fixated on a false idea. There is no glorification of child abuse in the Bible.

 

[Curried Goats]

I certainly want parents to dictate what their children do

And the decision must absolutely not be in the hands of homosexuals

When they decide to have sex should be in their hands, not their parents, you sick fuck.

 

[MinTrut]

If you approve of homosexuals doing disgusting things to each other thats too bad

Conservatives disapprove of homosexual acts, but are aroused by them.

Sounds conflicted to me.

But I dont

And particularly when children are involved

I'm glad we agree that neither the Bible nor Lawn Boy are appropriate for under 12s.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This is absolutely shocking.

Moms for Liberty has a problem with children being exposed to a book about rape and incest, and Joy Reid defends the book saying "Why should YOU get to decide what children should be able to read".

She then aggressively and constantly dissuades the issue while the Moms for Liberty rep continues to ask how rape, dildos, and incest are acceptable in a public school. Joy Reid says its about "context" (Harvard anyone?) and says "I'll answer your question" but then never does and continually interrupts and makes fallicy after fallicy.

You can disagree with people on policy, or even moral issues.. but Joy Reid is truly an evil individual here. She will not denounce a graphic, pornographic book about rape and incest, and instead attacks the people who speak against it and want it out of elementary/high school libraries.

Joy Reid is so arrogant and entitled. What makes her the “expert”?

 

[MinTrut]

It does not require anyone to be a closeted homosexual to object to homosexuals grooming children

And yet this is what conservatives are doing as they groom children to accept being raped.

This troubles me.

 

[MinTrut]

James Brown was a gifted entertainer

Indeed.

Unlike libs who begrudge the success of others I have no objection to Brown being rewarded for his talent

You seem to have missed the point, but that's okay.

 

[MinTrut]

I certainly want parents to dictate what their children do

After reading the Bible's accounts of incestuous rape?

Sounds like grooming to me.

And the decision must absolutely not be in the hands of homosexuals

So no parental rights for gay fathers and mothers?

But are you okay with fathers raping daughters, and mothers raping sons?

No gay sex happening there, right?

I find this troubling.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Joy Reid is so arrogant and entitled. What makes her the “expert”?

She’s a nasty, manipulative person with an agenda that’s for sure.

 

[MinTrut]

That you're insanely fixated on a false idea. There is no glorification of child abuse in the Bible.

That's what a groomer would say alright, but what do YOU think?

Why are conservatives both aroused and enraged by Lawn Boy?

Neither was the author's intent.

And why do they defend the Bible as a device to groom children to accept being raped?

What do you think?

 

[MinTrut]

She’s a nasty, manipulative person with an agenda that’s for sure.

Sounds like more projection.

Conservatives want Lawn Boy banned because it arouses and enrages them.

They think banning the book will make their same sex urges, in some cases age inappropriate, go away.

But this won't work.

 

[hadit]

That's what a groomer would say alright, but what do YOU think?

Why are conservatives both aroused and enraged by Lawn Boy?

Neither was the author's intent.

And why do they defend the Bible as a device to groom children to accept being raped?

What do you think?

That you're still maniacally attached to two false ideas.

 

[hadit]

Sounds like more projection.

Conservatives want Lawn Boy banned because it arouses and enrages them.

They think banning the book will make their same sex urges, in some cases age inappropriate, go away.

But this won't work.

You need to meet real people sometime.

 

[Mac-7]

When they decide to have sex should be in their hands, not their parents, you sick fuck.

When they are underage parents have the final say

 

[MinTrut]

That you're still maniacally attached to two false ideas.

I'd love to hear YOUR views rather than this devil's advocacy for groomers using the Bible to harm/rape children.

Sad in so many ways that conservatives are aroused/enraged by Lawn Boy.

 

[Mac-7]

Conservatives disapprove of homosexual acts, but are aroused by them.

Thats you spin designed to intimidate conservatives into silence

And it wont work

 

[MinTrut]

You need to meet real people sometime.

^ Trolling without content.

 

[Mac-7]

And yet this is what conservatives are doing as they groom children to accept being raped.

This troubles me.

Conservatives are not doing that

 

[Mr. Friscus]

The bottom line: exposing graphic illicit sexual acts to children is perverted and inappropriate. I would wager that 90% of the population would agree with that statement. The other 10% are probably either rabid woke LGBT ideologues, suspect creepers, or outright pedophiles.

 

[MinTrut]

Thats you spin designed to intimidate conservatives into silence

Fallacious/irrelevant.

Why do YOU think conservatives are so aroused and enraged by Lawn Boy if it's not caused by their gay/pedophile urges?

And why are they so obsessed with defending the Bible as a grooming device?

And it wont work

What's YOUR theory of why conservatives are promoting the grooming of children to be raped?

 

[MinTrut]

Conservatives are not doing that

Then why are conservatives promoting the Bible as a grooming device, and so aroused by Lawn Boy?

Saying they aren't isn't an argument unless you're a parrot btw.