Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 24,019
- 8,998
- 433
My position is as strong as ever. Exaggeration doesn't mean I didn't effectively prove Republicans tried to defend adult to teenage marriages. You didn't even make it that far. I haven't seen anything to support any of your claims.Oh, no misunderstanding at all, I was just enjoying watching you at first try to defend your position, then realize it was hopeless.
Are you now defending adult to teenage marriages? What's going on here?Whatever. It's only been in the last several hundred years that we've thought anything odd about girls getting married fairly soon after sexual maturity. Guys would get married later because they were expected to be stable and able to provide for a family.
That's a twist I didn't see coming.
Which goes for both heterosexuals and homosexuals who choose not to procreate.Of course, it isn't, but being fertile does you no good if you're not willing to mate.
And? Does nature care about dead ends? If you think so, explain entropy. Also, why did you shy away from defining negative genetic mutation? Who is it that is assigning value to these mutations? Nature?Sure, we have in vitro and stuff today, but in the natural world, refusing to mate is an evolutionary dead-end.
Last edited: