Asclepias
Diamond Member
If people are too stupid to ask questions instead of reacting emotionally I dont really care if they take what I said out of context. Its not like they are anyone important.Why would I protest the police for shooting people that were about to kill others?The police werent drawing cartoons. If Pam had of shot the nutcases herself that would be more like what I was saying.Thank you, Asclepias, at least you are consistent:
1. Yes
2. No I wouldnt give up my free speech. I'm only "endangering" myself. I actually would welcome someone opposed to my views threatening me then actually having the balls to come to my home. It would be the last thing they were able to do before I put them 6ft under.
3. "Justify" isnt the word I would use. The phrase would be more like "not surprised" Yes it would be my fault for provoking such an attack. I didnt have to provoke anyone.
Thank you at least you are consistent.
As for #2, I think the police working security did just that!
But if police shot the guy first, before you got to do the honors, you wouldn't protest them doing that, right?
And since she was busy hosting the event, I understand she hired SWAT guards for security.
So she was basically paying someone else to do that job for her so she didn't have to.
That would be like me hiring police to protect my home from a threat I provoked. What if all the cops had been killed? She put them in harms way because she doesnt understand simple respect.
Thanks Asclepias I think it helps that you give the entire framework, so that people don't take
part of what you say "out of context" and think you mean to coddle or excuse criminal behavior.
Your last few msgs make it clear that you're not saying this.
NOTE: this is like the difference between teaching Islam in the FULL CONTEXT with equal respect for Christian
and natural/civil/Constitutional laws, instead of taking part out of context where it sounds like supporting jihadists.