Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The government changing up the game after 100's of years, and therefore making the good citizens as criminals today is what has gone bad now, but I say enjoy it while it last, because it won't last much longer I don't think.. People will get a belly full of this bull, and they will see that it was foolishness that they have been led into believing now."A Christian woman sitting in jail for passively refusing to accomodate a gay wedding" is a mischaracterization.
She actively refused to offer her government services to all who qualified.
She can be charged with theft of services.
Technically she can be charged with failure to provide services for which she was responsible and accountable to provide.
The definition of losing is when you resort to such that your resorted to, and that my friend is the purest definition of the word losing..You used Warren Jeff's molesting of children in an argument that your losing and have now resorted to desperation on ? How low can you go ??? So sad, but it is a tactic that to many fools have since fallen for, and that is even more sadder than them all.The subject of the thread was churches being forced to perform marriages, not a government employee refusing to do their job.
I wasn't aware that buildings had 1st Amendment rights. I could've sworn that the 1st Amendment was about INDIVIDUAL people's rights to exercize of religion. So: groups of Christians in a building have rights but individual Christians at work do not. I wasn't aware of that fine print in the Constitution.
I was wondering when you were going to reintroduce this failed argument. Sovereign citizen bullshit with a religious twist, a land where a people get to choose which laws they follow, or not, based on their deeply held religious beliefs. Warren Jeffs should be released from prison b/c his religious beliefs says he can fuck children. After all, he answers to a higher authority. Where is The Liberty Council when you need them?
Oh cry me a river. It was used as an example of the silliness of claiming to be above the law and having to answer only to one's deeply held religious beliefs. An argument I am losing!? Too funny. Not a single church has been forced to marry any couple and gays are marrying Rowan County. Perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word losing.
America supports equal access and due process to government services.The government changing up the game after 100's of years, and therefore making the good citizens as criminals today is what has gone bad now, but I say enjoy it while it last, because it won't last much longer I don't think.. People will get a belly full of this bull, and they will see that it was foolishness that they have been led into believing now."A Christian woman sitting in jail for passively refusing to accomodate a gay wedding" is a mischaracterization.
She actively refused to offer her government services to all who qualified.
She can be charged with theft of services.
Technically she can be charged with failure to provide services for which she was responsible and accountable to provide.
The definition of losing is when you resort to such that your resorted to, and that my friend is the purest definition of the word losing..You used Warren Jeff's molesting of children in an argument that your losing and have now resorted to desperation on ? How low can you go ??? So sad, but it is a tactic that to many fools have since fallen for, and that is even more sadder than them all.The subject of the thread was churches being forced to perform marriages, not a government employee refusing to do their job.
I wasn't aware that buildings had 1st Amendment rights. I could've sworn that the 1st Amendment was about INDIVIDUAL people's rights to exercize of religion. So: groups of Christians in a building have rights but individual Christians at work do not. I wasn't aware of that fine print in the Constitution.
I was wondering when you were going to reintroduce this failed argument. Sovereign citizen bullshit with a religious twist, a land where a people get to choose which laws they follow, or not, based on their deeply held religious beliefs. Warren Jeffs should be released from prison b/c his religious beliefs says he can fuck children. After all, he answers to a higher authority. Where is The Liberty Council when you need them?
Oh cry me a river. It was used as an example of the silliness of claiming to be above the law and having to answer only to one's deeply held religious beliefs. An argument I am losing!? Too funny. Not a single church has been forced to marry any couple and gays are marrying Rowan County. Perhaps you don't know the meaning of the word losing.
That wasn't the question oh artful dodger...Would you say that speech is a behavior? That practicing religion is a behavior? That bearing arms is a behavior?
Your entire premise that 'behaviors' aren't protected under the constitution is obviously wrong. Remember, Sil.....you simply don't know what you're talking about.
That behaviors aren't constitutionaly protected was the basis of your silly argument.
Its nonsense. There are a litany of behaviors that are protected. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
People will get a belly full of this bull, and they will see that it was foolishness that they have been led into believing now.
Sil keeps insisting that LGBT is a race of people?
The issue is about the right to marriage, nothing else. That is how the courts see it.
You are wrong, as usual, if that is the issue. And the OP is about whether churches should forced to accomodate LGBT marriage.Sil keeps insisting that LGBT is a race of people?
The issue is about the right to marriage, nothing else. That is how the courts see it.
The courts are not being debated here.
The difference between right and wrong is
The courts are far from perfect
-Geaux
The government changing up the game after 100's of years, and therefore making the good citizens as criminals today is what has gone bad now, but I say enjoy it while it last, because it won't last much longer I don't think.. People will get a belly full of this bull, and they will see that it was foolishness that they have been led into believing now."A Christian woman sitting in jail for passively refusing to accomodate a gay wedding" is a mischaracterization.
She actively refused to offer her government services to all who qualified.
She can be charged with theft of services.
Technically she can be charged with failure to provide services for which she was responsible and accountable to provide.
Sil keeps insisting that LGBT is a race of people?
The issue is about the right to marriage, nothing else. That is how the courts see it.
The courts are not being debated here.
The difference between right and wrong is
The courts are far from perfect
-Geaux
Theism helped produce to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, so anti-theists can climb down off your high horses.
Thank you for the bold, underscore italics to my points.This > "And now they're openly celebrating a Christian in jail for refusing to accommodate the spread of the homosexual culture through the vehicle of marriage?" is exactly how the Nazi Party worked, telling out right Big Lies.
Davis went to jail because she would not do her job.
"Which verses of the bible are incorporated into the Constitution?" Silly suggest by you as you well know. Two deists, one polytheist, one agnostic, and fifty one Christians at the Convention. The Congress of 1789 was made up overwhelmingly of orthodox Christians. The values of theism overwhelmingly fashioned the documents.
