Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Freedom of speech also does not give a person the right to slander or libel someone. So, there ARE limits.
Sometimes it's when one person's rights come into conflict with another person's rights. But often, it's simply a matter of common sense.
Why is it YOUR BUSINESS deciding who needs or does not need something that is completely legal?People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Pay the tax and it is legal to own a fully automatic firearm. I see no need for one, personally, but far be it from me to decide what others need... or want.
Who needs a machine gun?
Should Machine guns (fully automatic weapons) be legal for average citizens to own?
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever [sic] restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
According to the SCOTUS, your version of gun restrictions does not, cannot and will not coexist with the Second Amendment. You can cry all you want about it, but the 2nd is sacrosanct because the courts have said so. Consistently.
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Freedom of speech also does not give a person the right to slander or libel someone. So, there ARE limits.
You're a jackass.
See? I used my free speech to slander you, and nobody can punish me for that. So there ARE NOT limits. When you take your speech and turn it into action, that's when there are limits. Such as is the case with gun control. While there are certain reasonable limits, yes, reasonable, the overall limit on owning a firearm for self defense is well, unlimited.
Deal with it.
lib logic- law abiding citizens, mostly conservatives cannot own any gun they want to protect family and home out of necessity.
but any woman, mostly liberals, can choose to kill her baby before its born- almost all the time because of convienance.
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
American citizens need to be able to own all small arms of the American military and police.....so if you don't want the civilians to own fully auto weapons...take them from the small arms inventory of the military......they have actual machine guns so their rifles can simply be semi auto...it is more accurate anyway.....
We are the bosses of the military and the police...they are not our masters.....so if they have a weapon it is only because we paid for it...and if they get it, so do we. That is how you make sure the govenrment has less of an advantage over us....
Meanwhile in the REAL world across the globe groups armed only with rifles pistols and in some cases less routinely defeat the US Military.People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
American citizens need to be able to own all small arms of the American military and police.....so if you don't want the civilians to own fully auto weapons...take them from the small arms inventory of the military......they have actual machine guns so their rifles can simply be semi auto...it is more accurate anyway.....
We are the bosses of the military and the police...they are not our masters.....so if they have a weapon it is only because we paid for it...and if they get it, so do we. That is how you make sure the govenrment has less of an advantage over us....
Yes we should have fully auto machine guns, but they can keep their tanks, attack helicopters, jets, battleships, aircraft carriers, and nukes.
No its the machine guns that will put us on an even footing.
I mean batshit is batshit. How do people actually convince themselves of what you said. That is some David Copperfield feat of magic.
Quit lying, asshole.lib logic- law abiding citizens, mostly conservatives cannot own any gun they want to protect family and home out of necessity.
but any woman, mostly liberals, can choose to kill her baby before its born- almost all the time because of convienance.
Ronald Reagan took away your right to have a machine gun made after 1986, not liberals.
Machine guns are legal under federal law and in most states.What say you?
What black woman needs to sit in the front of the bus?Who needs a machine gun?
More mindless nonsense form the village useful idiot.Given a choice, a god fearing Christian theocrat would have a missile silo in the back yard.
And use it.
I see you too seek the title of village useful Idiot.We should legalize rocket launchers and grenades too. Hell, there's no reason why I can't have a few ICBM's in,my backyard. For my protection of course. And if you disagree you're a gun grabbing socialist.
People talk about the 2nd Amendment as if it's somehow sacrosanct. But as anyone can tell you, not all weapons are legal for average Americans to own. I would say that's for good reason. Or as George H. W. Bush (or Dana Carvey) might have said, it wouldn't be prudent.
Just in case you need a reminder, think back to those days of Prohibition when criminals routinely used machine guns in the furtherance of their crimes.
What it proves, of course, is the 2nd Amendment can coexist with limited gun restrictions in the interest of public safety. However, maybe some 2nd Amendment absolutists have a different view and believe that average Americans should be allowed to own fully automatic weapons without the sever restrictions placed on them today.
What say you?
Rocket launchers don't kill people. People kill people.I see you too seek the title of village useful Idiot.We should legalize rocket launchers and grenades too. Hell, there's no reason why I can't have a few ICBM's in,my backyard. For my protection of course. And if you disagree you're a gun grabbing socialist.
