Should Muslim's be Exempt from Enhanced Security Checks at our Airports?

[L.K.Eder]

Oh, Art...I'm so disappointed in you.

I'd apologize but I'm too bitter and angry.

and consumed, and bitter.

 

[Intense]

I'd apologize but I'm too bitter and angry.

You are a total Asshole, but we already know that. You have contributed nothing to this thread but stink, and bullshit. You are a waste of time 15, so fuck off!

Wrong. He also called you out on your generalizing bullshit.

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

 

[L.K.Eder]

You are a total Asshole, but we already know that. You have contributed nothing to this thread but stink, and bullshit. You are a waste of time 15, so fuck off!

Wrong. He also called you out on your generalizing bullshit.

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

i support calling you out on your bullshit as it is a worthy contribution.

in fact i did it on this thread concerning your trolling title.

 

[Ravi]

Oh, Art...I'm so disappointed in you.

I'd apologize but I'm too bitter and angry.

and consumed, and bitter.

Not to mention bitterly consumed with anger.

 

[Ravi]

You are a total Asshole, but we already know that. You have contributed nothing to this thread but stink, and bullshit. You are a waste of time 15, so fuck off!

Wrong. He also called you out on your generalizing bullshit.

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

Generalizing, incorrectly I might add, about what a group of people think is not general principle, no matter how you may wish to pretend otherwise.

 

[Intense]

Wrong. He also called you out on your generalizing bullshit.

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

i support calling you out on your bullshit as it is a worthy contribution.

in fact i did it on this thread concerning your trolling title.

From the Article that founded This Thread...........


CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.
In the “special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab,” it states: “Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”
It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”
The new TSA pat-downs involving “head-to-toe” screening techniques follow recent airliner bombing attempts. Passengers who reject a full-body scan or who are selected for secondary screening may be searched using the enhanced pat-down.
“Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives,” a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others.”
Posted on its Web site under “TSA’s Head-to-Toe Screening Policies,” the agency said how people are dressed may lead to closer inspection, including baggy or loose clothing. Those policies also include individuals being searched by a “professional” of the same sex.
“It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner,” the policy reads.
In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu’ran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
CAIR endorsed the fatwa, according to a Feb. 21 article in the Detroit Free Press.
CAIR's press release on the TSA screening issue was first reported on by the Web site Black&Right.

Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ?Enhanced Pat Downs? Only on Head and Neck Area | CNSnews.com

Now, please explain how you have any legitimate argument to the claim you make. You seem pretty misinformed or disingenuous to me.

 

[Si modo]

Simple solution: Only allow their head and neck on the plane.

Best response ever.

And to the poll question, a big hell no. Did some alien culture stun the Earth with a Stupid Ray and I missed getting hit by it?

 

[L.K.Eder]

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

i support calling you out on your bullshit as it is a worthy contribution.

in fact i did it on this thread concerning your trolling title.

From the Article that founded This Thread...........


CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.
In the “special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab,” it states: “Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”
It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”
The new TSA pat-downs involving “head-to-toe” screening techniques follow recent airliner bombing attempts. Passengers who reject a full-body scan or who are selected for secondary screening may be searched using the enhanced pat-down.
“Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives,” a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others.”
Posted on its Web site under “TSA’s Head-to-Toe Screening Policies,” the agency said how people are dressed may lead to closer inspection, including baggy or loose clothing. Those policies also include individuals being searched by a “professional” of the same sex.
“It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner,” the policy reads.
In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu’ran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
CAIR endorsed the fatwa, according to a Feb. 21 article in the Detroit Free Press.
CAIR's press release on the TSA screening issue was first reported on by the Web site Black&Right.

Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ?Enhanced Pat Downs? Only on Head and Neck Area | CNSnews.com

Now, please explain how you have any legitimate argument to the claim you make. You seem pretty misinformed or disingenuous to me.

you could explain how you bridged the gap from the CAIR info to your thread title.

as asked days ago.

no need to further highlight your lack of judgement, btw.

 

[Intense]

Wrong. He also called you out on your generalizing bullshit.

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

Generalizing, incorrectly I might add, about what a group of people think is not general principle, no matter how you may wish to pretend otherwise.

Ravi, I just don't see you qualified to determine for any other, what is correct or incorrect thinking. Pretending, is what you may indeed be an authority on. Run with it Girl.

Anytime you have a specific criticism or question, I will do my best to answer it.

 

[Ravi]

Ravi, do you have anything else to do besides Troll? You don't understand general principle, I can't help you with that. You seem to only understand by doing, understanding that way is very limited and inflexible, though that does explain you. Why not either contribute or find a ball of string to occupy your time. Some day you may even begin to understand general principle.

Generalizing, incorrectly I might add, about what a group of people think is not general principle, no matter how you may wish to pretend otherwise.

Ravi, I just don't see you qualified to determine for any other, what is correct or incorrect thinking. Pretending, is what you may indeed be an authority on. Run with it Girl.

Anytime you have a specific criticism or question, I will do my best to answer it.

Why bother, you always simply deflect. You are permitted to go on being deluded, it suits you.

 

[Intense]

i support calling you out on your bullshit as it is a worthy contribution.

in fact i did it on this thread concerning your trolling title.

From the Article that founded This Thread...........


CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.
In the “special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab,” it states: “Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”
It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”
The new TSA pat-downs involving “head-to-toe” screening techniques follow recent airliner bombing attempts. Passengers who reject a full-body scan or who are selected for secondary screening may be searched using the enhanced pat-down.
“Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives,” a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others.”
Posted on its Web site under “TSA’s Head-to-Toe Screening Policies,” the agency said how people are dressed may lead to closer inspection, including baggy or loose clothing. Those policies also include individuals being searched by a “professional” of the same sex.
“It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner,” the policy reads.
In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu’ran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
CAIR endorsed the fatwa, according to a Feb. 21 article in the Detroit Free Press.
CAIR's press release on the TSA screening issue was first reported on by the Web site Black&Right.

Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ?Enhanced Pat Downs? Only on Head and Neck Area | CNSnews.com

Now, please explain how you have any legitimate argument to the claim you make. You seem pretty misinformed or disingenuous to me.

you could explain how you bridged the gap from the CAIR info to your thread title.

as asked days ago.

no need to further highlight your lack of judgement, btw.

Should Muslim's be Exempt from Enhanced Security Checks at our Airports?

Please explain how this Title is misleading. Be Specific. What is genuine in your claim and accusation, what is it based on? What planet are you from? More scorch and burn? Is that it? Destroy or discredit that which you can't otherwise address.

 

[L.K.Eder]

From the Article that founded This Thread...........


CAIR said Muslims who object to full-body scans for religious reasons should know their rights if they are required to undergo a pat-down, including asking for the procedure to be done in a private place. In addition, CAIR offered a “special recommendation” for Muslim women who wear a hijab, telling them they should tell the TSA officer that they may be searched only around the head and neck.
In the “special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab,” it states: “Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.”
It also states: “Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”
The new TSA pat-downs involving “head-to-toe” screening techniques follow recent airliner bombing attempts. Passengers who reject a full-body scan or who are selected for secondary screening may be searched using the enhanced pat-down.
“Pat downs are one important tool to help TSA detect hidden and dangerous items such as explosives,” a TSA statement issued on Oct. 28 stated. “Passengers should continue to expect an unpredictable mix of security layers that include explosives trace detection, advanced imaging technology, canine teams, among others.”
Posted on its Web site under “TSA’s Head-to-Toe Screening Policies,” the agency said how people are dressed may lead to closer inspection, including baggy or loose clothing. Those policies also include individuals being searched by a “professional” of the same sex.
“It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner,” the policy reads.
In February, the Figh Council of North America, a group of Islamic scholars, issued a fatwa, or religious ruling, that full-body scanners violate Islamic law.
“It is a violation of clear Islamic teaching that men or women be seen naked by other men and women,” the ruling states. “Islam highly emphasizes haya (modesty) and considers it part of the faith. The Qu’ran has commanded the believers, both men and women, to cover their private parts.”
CAIR endorsed the fatwa, according to a Feb. 21 article in the Detroit Free Press.
CAIR's press release on the TSA screening issue was first reported on by the Web site Black&Right.

Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ?Enhanced Pat Downs? Only on Head and Neck Area | CNSnews.com

Now, please explain how you have any legitimate argument to the claim you make. You seem pretty misinformed or disingenuous to me.

you could explain how you bridged the gap from the CAIR info to your thread title.

as asked days ago.

no need to further highlight your lack of judgement, btw.

Should Muslim's be Exempt from Enhanced Security Checks at our Airports?

Please explain how this Title is misleading. Be Specific. What is genuine in your claim and accusation, what is it based on? What planet are you from? More scorch and burn? Is that it? Destroy or discredit that which you can't otherwise address.

no, that's not how it works.

you explain how your thought process went from reading the CAIR info to posting it with that thread title.

be specific, clown.

 

[Intense]

It is really amazing to me, considering the typical Thread Title, Scanning the entire community here, knowing how much I tried to Title this one in the most fair minded way I know. I see nothing misleading about it at all, I see nothing baiting about it either. It is a simple question. My answer to the Poll, was 3 out of 4. I'd ask you to guess, but some of you, caught up in Pack Attack, blind rage Scorch and Burn mentality, have proven incapable. You question my integrity on false argument, and claim conquest because I ignore your stupidity. Why do you think I should explain the obvious to you, as if I owe it to you? Who are you that I should be obligated to deal with you on your terms, which I personally find unreasonable?

 

[Intense]

you could explain how you bridged the gap from the CAIR info to your thread title.

as asked days ago.

no need to further highlight your lack of judgement, btw.

Should Muslim's be Exempt from Enhanced Security Checks at our Airports?

Please explain how this Title is misleading. Be Specific. What is genuine in your claim and accusation, what is it based on? What planet are you from? More scorch and burn? Is that it? Destroy or discredit that which you can't otherwise address.

no, that's not how it works.

you explain how your thought process went from reading the CAIR info to posting it with that thread title.

be specific, clown.

There is one Clown here, and I am addressing you, on my Terms. You don't like my Thread Title? Fuck You. It's that simple. You want to add imaginary reasons why you think things are the way they are, what goes on in your head is your business, Jack Ass.

My reaction to that article was that Question. It is too complicated for your corrupted peanut sized brain to process, so why don't you just go back to eating paste and let the grown ups talk, you disingenuous Fuck.

 

[L.K.Eder]

It is really amazing to me, considering the typical Thread Title, Scanning the entire community here, knowing how much I tried to Title this one in the most fair minded way I know. I see nothing misleading about it at all, I see nothing baiting about it either. It is a simple question. My answer to the Poll, was 3 out of 4. I'd ask you to guess, but some of you, caught up in Pack Attack, blind rage Scorch and Burn mentality, have proven incapable. You question my integrity on false argument, and claim conquest because I ignore your stupidity. Why do you think I should explain the obvious to you, as if I owe it to you? Who are you that I should be obligated to deal with you on your terms, which I personally find unreasonable?

you are so misunderstood. now don't become all bitter and consumed.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Should Muslim's be Exempt from Enhanced Security Checks at our Airports?

Please explain how this Title is misleading. Be Specific. What is genuine in your claim and accusation, what is it based on? What planet are you from? More scorch and burn? Is that it? Destroy or discredit that which you can't otherwise address.

no, that's not how it works.

you explain how your thought process went from reading the CAIR info to posting it with that thread title.

be specific, clown.

There is one Clown here, and I am addressing you, on my Terms. You don't like my Thread Title? Fuck You. It's that simple. You want to add imaginary reasons why you think things are the way they are, what goes on in your head is your business, Jack Ass.

My reaction to that article was that Question. It is too complicated for your corrupted peanut sized brain to process, so why don't you just go back to eating paste and let the grown ups talk, you disingenuous Fuck.

wow, did not see that coming.

oh, wait. i saw that coming.

you should really not be so bitter and consumed.

 

[Intense]

It is really amazing to me, considering the typical Thread Title, Scanning the entire community here, knowing how much I tried to Title this one in the most fair minded way I know. I see nothing misleading about it at all, I see nothing baiting about it either. It is a simple question. My answer to the Poll, was 3 out of 4. I'd ask you to guess, but some of you, caught up in Pack Attack, blind rage Scorch and Burn mentality, have proven incapable. You question my integrity on false argument, and claim conquest because I ignore your stupidity. Why do you think I should explain the obvious to you, as if I owe it to you? Who are you that I should be obligated to deal with you on your terms, which I personally find unreasonable?

you are so misunderstood. now don't become all bitter and consumed.

How many on topic Posts have you made on this Thread Troll????? Thought so.

 

[Intense]

no, that's not how it works.

you explain how your thought process went from reading the CAIR info to posting it with that thread title.

be specific, clown.

There is one Clown here, and I am addressing you, on my Terms. You don't like my Thread Title? Fuck You. It's that simple. You want to add imaginary reasons why you think things are the way they are, what goes on in your head is your business, Jack Ass.

My reaction to that article was that Question. It is too complicated for your corrupted peanut sized brain to process, so why don't you just go back to eating paste and let the grown ups talk, you disingenuous Fuck.

wow, did not see that coming.

oh, wait. i saw that coming.

you should really not be so bitter and consumed.

You should lighten up on the Bullshit Sparky, and find something on topic or find someone else to Stalk.

 

[L.K.Eder]

It is really amazing to me, considering the typical Thread Title, Scanning the entire community here, knowing how much I tried to Title this one in the most fair minded way I know. I see nothing misleading about it at all, I see nothing baiting about it either. It is a simple question. My answer to the Poll, was 3 out of 4. I'd ask you to guess, but some of you, caught up in Pack Attack, blind rage Scorch and Burn mentality, have proven incapable. You question my integrity on false argument, and claim conquest because I ignore your stupidity. Why do you think I should explain the obvious to you, as if I owe it to you? Who are you that I should be obligated to deal with you on your terms, which I personally find unreasonable?

you are so misunderstood. now don't become all bitter and consumed.

How many on topic Posts have you made on this Thread Troll????? Thought so.

I made 4 on topic posts in your Troll Thread.

Thanks for asking.

 

[L.K.Eder]

There is one Clown here, and I am addressing you, on my Terms. You don't like my Thread Title? Fuck You. It's that simple. You want to add imaginary reasons why you think things are the way they are, what goes on in your head is your business, Jack Ass.

My reaction to that article was that Question. It is too complicated for your corrupted peanut sized brain to process, so why don't you just go back to eating paste and let the grown ups talk, you disingenuous Fuck.

wow, did not see that coming.

oh, wait. i saw that coming.

you should really not be so bitter and consumed.

You should lighten up on the Bullshit Sparky, and find something on topic or find someone else to Stalk.

is this an order, melty mcmeltdown?