Should Obama be on trial for treason?

Should Obama be tried for treason?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 9 27.3%
  • No!

    Votes: 15 45.5%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
Treason is the highest crime in the United States, it is even specified in the Constitution:

Section 3

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

It is now revealed that Obama and his criminal racket have been training and arming Al Qaeda for quite some time, particularly in Syria, USA TODAY and CBS have both broken the stories (although many alternate news sources have been saying this for years):

Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda

U.S. training Syrian rebels at secret bases - CBS News


Nothing in either story "reveals" that.

You must be a complete fucking retard.
 
Answer:

Yes, but not until he's out of office and no longer has any delusion of being able to overturn His own conviction with another unconstitutional executive order.
 
Two years later: ISIS running around with US supplied weapons. Mccain and Obama still not in jail. Phony scandal!
 

Forum List

Back
Top