Should we be able to smoke pot in public?

[Meister]

Oh, so we should be able to smoke cigarettes wherever public drinking is allowed too? Like restaurants?

There are bars in airports. Should we be able to smoke harmless pot there but not icky tobacco?

See post #18

Pot is decriminalized. You are still subject to the same laws that apply to public drinking and smoking

Tobacco is criminalized? You miss the point and of course this thread again proves me right. When it comes to tobacco, liberals certainly seem to be united in their disdain for smoking tobacco in public.

Of course when it comes to pot, the same left that is digusted by tobacco are all over the place in regards to pot in public.

You probably think it's ok to smoke a doobie on your morning break, right?
Idiot

 

[nodoginnafight]

Any legal activity should be allowed anywhere any time.

If you don't want to allow it then make it illegal.

So people should be able to screw on the table at a restaurant??????

 

[Skull Pilot]

Any legal activity should be allowed anywhere any time.

If you don't want to allow it then make it illegal.

So people should be able to screw on the table at a restaurant??????

I thought the thread was about public spaces not private businesses.

 

[Kosh]

I voted NO, but not because of: "pot is very bad for you "

If someone wants to do this in their home and on their property go for it..

Since even people can get a "contact buzz" from smoking pot then it should not be allowed. It is the relatively the same argument that was used of cigarettes. So the same rules should be applied equally.

 

[Noomi]

Real simple question, yes or no.

Who wants idiotic pot heads walking the streets?

 

[Skull Pilot]

Real simple question, yes or no.

Who wants idiotic pot heads walking the streets?

They already are.

 

[Noomi]

Why on earth would you want more.

 

[westwall]

Real simple question, yes or no.

Nope. If people can't smoke tobacco in public then there's no way they should be allowed to smoke weed.