Oldestyle
Diamond Member
Yes, there are more opportunities in cities, ceteris paribus.So if there are more opportunities in big cities then why are cities that have been run by liberals for generations like New York, Detroit, Chicago and Los Angeles doing so badly? Why haven't the liberal policies in those cities turned them into worker paradises?Not really. There is simply more opportunity in big cities. Every person in a City is a potential market participant in any given market. More rural areas tend to be more "hunter gatherer" in their capacity to find meaningful work for their population.Isn't it amazing though...that the poorest people seem to reside in cities run for decades by liberal Democrats? Why hasn't liberal policies in THOSE cities created wealth for the poor, Daniel? Care to take a crack at explaining that?
"Hunter Gatherer"? LOL You don't really know how people live in the "fly over" areas of this country...do you, Daniel?
And, I have no idea what you are talking about.
The economy of Los Angeles is driven by international trade, entertainment (television, motion pictures, video games, music recording, and production), aerospace, technology, petroleum, fashion, apparel, and tourism.[citation needed] Other significant industries include finance, telecommunications, law, healthcare, and transportation. In the 2017 Global Financial Centres Index, Los Angeles was ranked as having the 19th most competitive financial center in the world, and sixth most competitive in United States (after New York City, San Francisco, Chicago, Boston, and Washington, D.C.).[137]--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles#Economy
![thehill.com](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/newyorkcity_trash_042418gn.jpg?w=1280)
The great exodus out of America’s blue cities
Major liberal metropolitan areas have become so over-regulated, so overpriced and so mismanaged that people are leaving in droves.
![thehill.com](https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/03/cropped-favicon-512px-1.png?w=32)