SNAP (food stamps) should be restricted to rice, flour, rolled oats, and sugar

[owebo]

Would you care to share the point you think you have with us then?

Both, promote and provide are terms used when referring to the general welfare, in our federal Constitution.

Again....did you have a fucking point?

Yes, that you are simply clueless and Causeless.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

and,

if foul language is tolerated in the name of free speech, then why isn't relevant forms of porn, in the Information Age?

Then do you care to share your FUCKING point with us?

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

 

[owebo]

You missed my point. I'm not talking about rich heirs. Of course they didn't earn their millions. But even rich people with jobs usually do nothing of any social value. What does lebron do to help america? Maybe he works real hard and no doubt he makes money for his owner, but the fact remains that athletes are useless people. THINK

How much does the one percent actually pay in real, personal income tax?

We know our, tax avoider in chief, may not have to pay any personal income taxes, for decades.

Link?

don't believe me? if i have to post a link, i won't take your arguments seriously either, with links for Every point of contention.

i don't have to lie or resort to fallacy for my Cause.

No I don't believe you....link?

cool. i don't believe you either, person on the fantastical right wing, in advance.

here is the link:

Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years, records obtained by The New York Times show.--http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0

The rich cannot care if they don't pay personal income taxes for it.

So another post where you have no fucking link...

One could easily confuse you with a fascist LWNJ.....

 

[danielpalos]

[


Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

That is not enough for these greedy dumbass Moon Bats. They want it all, every last cent. They think they are entitled to the money that other people make because they are alive. Filthy Liberal greed and thievery.

should robots have to care how much they get taxed?

 

[danielpalos]

Both, promote and provide are terms used when referring to the general welfare, in our federal Constitution.

Again....did you have a fucking point?

Yes, that you are simply clueless and Causeless.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

and,

if foul language is tolerated in the name of free speech, then why isn't relevant forms of porn, in the Information Age?

Then do you care to share your FUCKING point with us?

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

 

[danielpalos]

How much does the one percent actually pay in real, personal income tax?

We know our, tax avoider in chief, may not have to pay any personal income taxes, for decades.

Link?

don't believe me? if i have to post a link, i won't take your arguments seriously either, with links for Every point of contention.

i don't have to lie or resort to fallacy for my Cause.

No I don't believe you....link?

cool. i don't believe you either, person on the fantastical right wing, in advance.

here is the link:

Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years, records obtained by The New York Times show.--http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html?_r=0

The rich cannot care if they don't pay personal income taxes for it.

So another post where you have no fucking link...

One could easily confuse you with a fascist LWNJ.....

just right wing fantasy?

i included the link. why Only continuance, diversion, and other forms of fallacy instead of a valid argument for rebuttal?

 

[owebo]

Again....did you have a fucking point?

Yes, that you are simply clueless and Causeless.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

and,

if foul language is tolerated in the name of free speech, then why isn't relevant forms of porn, in the Information Age?

Then do you care to share your FUCKING point with us?

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Some have inherited wealth but most rich people that pay into that filthy ass trillion a year in income tax earned their money somewhere along the line.

You missed my point. I'm not talking about rich heirs. Of course they didn't earn their millions. But even rich people with jobs usually do nothing of any social value. What does lebron do to help america? Maybe he works real hard and no doubt he makes money for his owner, but the fact remains that athletes are useless people. THINK

How much does the one percent actually pay in real, personal income tax?

We know our, tax avoider in chief, may not have to pay any personal income taxes, for decades.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

special pleading if you don't distinguish, real personal income taxes, like the ninety percent usually pay.

Simply having a foundation pay all of your taxes for you, is not the same as personal income taxes on personal, earned income.

What foundation are you talking about? It's right there in front of you. The top 1% of wage earners in this country pay nearly half of all collected federal income tax. The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay 70% of all collected income taxes.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, that you are simply clueless and Causeless.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

and,

if foul language is tolerated in the name of free speech, then why isn't relevant forms of porn, in the Information Age?

Then do you care to share your FUCKING point with us?

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

[


Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

That is not enough for these greedy dumbass Moon Bats. They want it all, every last cent. They think they are entitled to the money that other people make because they are alive. Filthy Liberal greed and thievery.

They are amazing people. When you show them how much the rich pay, and if that's not enough, what percentage should they pay, they say all of it. Then call rich people greedy two posts later.

 

[owebo]

Then do you care to share your FUCKING point with us?

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

 

[danielpalos]

Some have inherited wealth but most rich people that pay into that filthy ass trillion a year in income tax earned their money somewhere along the line.

You missed my point. I'm not talking about rich heirs. Of course they didn't earn their millions. But even rich people with jobs usually do nothing of any social value. What does lebron do to help america? Maybe he works real hard and no doubt he makes money for his owner, but the fact remains that athletes are useless people. THINK

How much does the one percent actually pay in real, personal income tax?

We know our, tax avoider in chief, may not have to pay any personal income taxes, for decades.

Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

special pleading if you don't distinguish, real personal income taxes, like the ninety percent usually pay.

Simply having a foundation pay all of your taxes for you, is not the same as personal income taxes on personal, earned income.

What foundation are you talking about? It's right there in front of you. The top 1% of wage earners in this country pay nearly half of all collected federal income tax. The top 10% of wage earners in this country pay 70% of all collected income taxes.

Personal income taxes versus non personal income taxes. Who cares if artificial persons pay all of the taxes for the rich. we merely need to change our tax codes so robots can pay all the taxes for the poor.

 

[danielpalos]

[


Top 1% pay nearly half of federal income taxes

That is not enough for these greedy dumbass Moon Bats. They want it all, every last cent. They think they are entitled to the money that other people make because they are alive. Filthy Liberal greed and thievery.

They are amazing people. When you show them how much the rich pay, and if that's not enough, what percentage should they pay, they say all of it. Then call rich people greedy two posts later.

just right wing fantasy until the tax returns come in.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

You're not kidding. I don't think he understands one word of the US Constitution. His claim is that because we have laws that we enforce in this country, it shouldn't be allowed because it's not in the Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

thank you for the practice in patience, with you, grasshopper.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

you must be on the right.

there is a difference between the general welfare and the general badfare; only one term is in our federal Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

You're not kidding. I don't think he understands one word of the US Constitution. His claim is that because we have laws that we enforce in this country, it shouldn't be allowed because it's not in the Constitution.

i understand the fantastical right wing has nothing but fallacy, instead of valid arguments.

 

[owebo]

So, you have no point.....

Why didn't you just say that....

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

you must be on the right.

there is a difference between the general welfare and the general badfare; only one term is in our federal Constitution.

Oir SCOTUS will fix your problem soon...very,soon....

 

[danielpalos]

Because, unlike you, i do have some clue and some Cause.

Promoting the general welfare does not mean, promoting the general badfare, or the general warfare or the common offense.

Where, for example, can a war on drugs, be found in the Republican Doctrine?

No, it's cool...you're pointless....

The point is, promoting the general welfare does not mean prosecuting a drug war; it does mean providing for the general welfare and general prosperity. Solving for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment on an at-will basis, does just that.

Pointless....

You are a LWNJ....

you must be on the right.

there is a difference between the general welfare and the general badfare; only one term is in our federal Constitution.

Oir SCOTUS will fix your problem soon...very,soon....

not my problem; the right still can't find their lost clue or their lost Cause, through Any enumeration of such power, in the Republican Party Doctrine.

 

[Flash]

[Q

we merely need to change our tax codes so robots can pay all the taxes for the poor.

Libtard Moon Bat greed. You haz it! Use the oppression of government to force other people to pay your bills. That is the definition of slavery, isn't it? That pretty well makes you thief and a scumbag, doesn't it?

You are confused about this.

Instead of stealing money from those that make it what we really need to do is reduce the size of this corrupt, oppressive, out of control government to the bare minimum and then charge everybody equally for the services they get, including you Moon Bat leeches. That way when you go to the polls you won't vote in big government Liberal assholes that will affect your pocketbook.

 

[danielpalos]

how can the fantastical right wing, have a problem with it?

we merely need to change our tax codes so robots can pay all the taxes for the poor.

Money has already been earned and taxed, at least once; Only the right wing, never gets it.

Fiat money has no intrinsic worth; its value comes as a medium of exchange; thus, why capital must circulate.

 

[danielpalos]

[


So you think lebron james is as valuable to america as steve jobs was?

What do you mean by valuable?

People are willing to give him money for what he does the same as they gave Jobs money for what he did.

I would not personally give James one cent of my money because I am not a fan of professional basketball. I wouldn't pay 50 cents to go to a game. However, there are a lot of people that enjoy professional basketball and are willing to spend money to see him and his team play. That is called the free market.

Tax policy is not be based upon a subjective determination of social worth of a particular profession as far as I know. Is that what you are are advocating? What if your determination of social worth is different than mine? Which one do we go with? I propose we go with mine. That would be fair.

the right wing claims a work or die ethic from the Age of Iron should be more valued than a work ethic from the Age of Corporate Welfare.