Snowfalls Are Now Just A Thing Of The Past*

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

GISS is part of NASA, they are the ones who are playing the numbers, you being unaware of this long standing problem, means you aren't paying attention.

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

 

[Taz]

* On March 20, 2000, The Independent, a British newspaper, reported that “Snowfalls are just a thing of the past.” Global warming was simply making the UK too warm for heavy snowfalls.

———————-
October snowstorm set to smash early-season records

Beyond Local: Mt. Norquay set for earliest opening day in 95 year history

For opening day, Mt. Norquay will be operating the Cascade Chair, with the Cascade Lodge accessible to guests

www.albertaprimetimes.com

Near-record cold continues this evening

Meteorologist Jason Sydejko has the latest forecast.

news.yahoo.com

October snowstorm set to smash early-season records

Another potentially record-setting snowstorm is set to target millions of Americans in the coming days.

www.upi.com

First Ski Resort In The United States OPENS For The Ski Season

October 21, 2020 marked the opening day of the 2020/21 ski season. Wild Mountain, MN is open for skiing and riding.

unofficialnetworks.com

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

Fake data. Show me the risen oceans, the zero snow, the deserts that were forests.

It's from NASA's website. Things aren't fake just because you don't like them, no matter what Donnie says.

Man releasing carbon changing the weather is FAKE as hell.

How do I know for sure----if it were real there would be ONLY ONE solution that would save the rice-------and that would be cutting the number people in the lower classes---they would be advocating for sterilizations.

The temperature change of the earth corresponds with its relationship with the sun just like every other planet.

Man can change local weather only--but adding roads/cement/buildings. THIS RAISES the local tempature up to 3 degrees..........

Let's see, on one side there's NASA, on the other side is you rambling on some gibberish. Hmmm... I think I'll stick with NASA.

You don't like the facts? Man made carbon isn't warming the planet----------- There is not scientific evidence to back that carbon is warming the planet. Nasa and other making big money off the carbon hoax are using a faulty computer mode that continues to prove itselve wrong over and over and over again.

Cement and asphalt and concrete does locally though.


Again if man released carbon was warming the planet as they claim--the rich would sterilize the poor instead of encouraging them to breed.

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

Genders are not science?

Another science denier genius.

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

Genders are not science?

Another science denier genius.

WOW another science denier and dupe...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Again I post PHYSICAL EVIDENCE vs a Model. Where is NASA's warming?

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

View attachment 406494

So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?

 

[Sunsettommy]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

LINK

===

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

View attachment 406494

So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?

Does CO2's interaction with water vapor actually amplify or does it dampen? ERBE shows a dampening and thus no hot spot. With out this basic premise CAGW FAILS...

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

NASA cooled the past tempratures and increased the present temps. This was clearly shown in Suns previous posts. They have been caught data manipulating many, many times.

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

View attachment 406494

So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?

Does CO2's interaction with water vapor actually amplify or does it dampen? ERBE shows a dampening and thus no hot spot. With out this basic premise CAGW FAILS...

I'm not sure how these separate details all plug in with GW, because taken as a whole, the temperature has been rising since the industrial revolution, and is predicted to keep on rising into the future.

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

NASA cooled the past tempratures and increased the present temps. This was clearly shown in Suns previous posts. They have been caught data manipulating many, many times.

NASA did not create global warming by manipulating data

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

View attachment 406494

So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?

Does CO2's interaction with water vapor actually amplify or does it dampen? ERBE shows a dampening and thus no hot spot. With out this basic premise CAGW FAILS...

I'm not sure how these separate details all plug in with GW, because taken as a whole, the temperature has been rising since the industrial revolution, and is predicted to keep on rising into the future.

The earth is a cyclical system..

Warming spikes are seen every time we begin a cooling cycle and we are over due...

 

[Billy_Bob]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

NASA cooled the past tempratures and increased the present temps. This was clearly shown in Suns previous posts. They have been caught data manipulating many, many times.

NASA did not create global warming by manipulating data

They have been caught "fixing" data many times..

.xyz 10th Anniversary | .xyz Domain Names | Join Generation XYZ

Celebrating 10 years of .xyz - over a decade of innovation! We are beginning the countdown to our decade-iversary! Over ten chapters, journey through a decade of innovation with .xyz. From its ambitious inception to quickly becoming a leader in the domain industry, each press release will unveil...

www.spaceref.com

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

I will provide a link again to the basics of Anthroprogenic Global Warming. Most of the facts are not in dispute. There is conjecture around the effect of CO2 in our atmosphere. The ERBE satellite data shows there is no hot spot and that the input/output balance is unchanged by adding more CO2.

The Skeptic's Case | Mises Institute

Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message.

mises.org

Again, even NASA has not answered the question of how and where their missing energy is..

View attachment 406494

So they're saying that 2/3 of the CO2 increase is from a feedback loop and amplification. Ya, so what? It means that the CO2 we put into the system amplifies itself to make it worse? Is that about right? Or did I get something wrong?

Does CO2's interaction with water vapor actually amplify or does it dampen? ERBE shows a dampening and thus no hot spot. With out this basic premise CAGW FAILS...

I'm not sure how these separate details all plug in with GW, because taken as a whole, the temperature has been rising since the industrial revolution, and is predicted to keep on rising into the future.

The earth is a cyclical system..

View attachment 406523

Warming spikes are seen every time we begin a cooling cycle and we are over due...

But the red spike at the far right goes off the chart for the first time, and the blue part is more bunched up closer to today, also for the first time. What exactly are you trying to prove?

 

[Adrenochrome Junkie]

Since it’s so damn hot. Why don’t all you liberals go ahead and move to Antarctica.

If you believe in Global Warming wouldn’t you take advantage of the opportunity to be the first to civilize Antarctica?

 

[Taz]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

NASA cooled the past tempratures and increased the present temps. This was clearly shown in Suns previous posts. They have been caught data manipulating many, many times.

NASA did not create global warming by manipulating data

They have been caught "fixing" data many times..

.xyz 10th Anniversary | .xyz Domain Names | Join Generation XYZ

Celebrating 10 years of .xyz - over a decade of innovation! We are beginning the countdown to our decade-iversary! Over ten chapters, journey through a decade of innovation with .xyz. From its ambitious inception to quickly becoming a leader in the domain industry, each press release will unveil...

www.spaceref.com

Ya, I saw that. If you find a link to NASA apologizing for doing what they are accused of, I would accept that. A TV station? I'd first have to know if they are Trump supporters...

 

[Sunsettommy]

We just had an all time record snow for Oct and now cold weather for MN this week.
Until I see Palm Trees on the shores of Lake Superior I will be sceptical of this calamity of global warming.
Those Palms do start growing here, I will then believe the warming and celebrate with a Mai Tai on the beaches of Duluth.

Why is it that everyone who voted for Donnie denies science?

Like the liberals who claim multiple genders?

That's simply trying to help people who are going through a personal crisis, but you'd need empathy for that, which Trump voters also don't have.
You actually deny science.

How so?
I welcome the supposed warming. Still waiting for it to kick in. The climate has changed constantly for the planets entire history. That doesn't signify a world calamity. Species evolve or die out. That is nature and tough luck for some.
A scientist is supposed to be sceptical of supposed claims of consensus.

So when does your scientific consensus of the end of snow start? I am getting impatient with the yearly normal cold assed winters.

Man, what's it like to purposely choose to be ignorant, when you can read up on all the GW science out there on the internet.

The IPCC garbage is hyperbole... Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

Oh great, another clueless noob just in to say something inane.

Taz, who can't answer the question, yet has the gall to insult a scientist working on his PHD over it.

Here is the tuff question Taz ignores....

Tell me how CO2 is storing energy AND WHERE IT IS. I'll wait.

It appears another leftist AGW believer failing to defend the ideology.

Is this question supposed to prove that NASA is faking their data?

Answer the question fella, your dodging the question is boring.

LOL

I've given up on him.... He spouts crapola and has no science to back up his assertions..

I back what I say with NASA. You peeps have nothing but more fake news.

The following are from NASA:

View attachment 406519

LINK

===

View attachment 406521

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/graph_data/U.S._Temperature/graph.png

======

Now watch the resistance to the NASA only sources evidence from Taz....

What am I looking at? It seems like the temperature average is rising over time? And possibly accelerating the closer we get to today?

You are looking at two GISS generated charts with significant data alterations in them.

The 1999 version shows the 1930's high point as being hotter than 1998, while the 2019 version shows the obvious cooling of the past, warming the recent past.


The 1999 starting point in 1880 is 0 C, in 2019 the starting point is it now -.20C

In 1936 it was 1.5C, now it is 1.1C . in the 1999 chart, 1998 was .9C, now it is 1.2C in the 2019 chart.

This all from GISS (part of NASA)