Snowflakes Condemning Trump For Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Should Answer These Questions:

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,142
2,645
Actually, before Obama dragged the United States in his Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized War, perhaps HE should have answered these questions...right before going to Congress to ask for permission to take the country to war:



1) What national security interest, rather than pure humanitarian interest, is served by the use of American military power to depose Assad’s regime?

2) How will deposing Assad make America safer?

3) What does final political victory in Syria look like (be specific), and how long will it take for that political victory to be achieved?

4) What military resources (e.g., ground troops), diplomatic resources, and financial resources will be required to achieve this political victory?

5) How long will it take to achieve political victory?

6) What costs, in terms of lives (both military and civilian), dollars, and forgone options elsewhere as a result of resource deployment in Syria, will be required to achieve political victory?

7) What other countries will join the United States in deposing Assad, in terms of military, monetary, or diplomatic resources?

8) Should explicit congressional authorization for the use of military force in Syria be required, or should the president take action without congressional approval?

9) What is the risk of wider conflict with Russia, given that nation’s presence and stake in Syria, if the United States chooses to invade and depose Assad, a key Russian ally in the Middle East?

10) If U.S. intervention in Syria does spark a larger war with Russia, what does political victory in that scenario look like, and what costs will it entail?

11) Given that Assad has already demonstrated a willingness to use chemical weapons, how should the United States respond if the Assad regime deploys chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons against the United States?

12) Assuming the Assad regime is successfully removed from power, what type of government structure will be used to replace Assad, who will select that government, and how will that government establish and maintain stability going forward?

13) Given that a change in political power in the United States radically altered the American position in Iraq in 2009, how will you mitigate or address the risk of a similar political dynamic upending your preferred strategy in Syria, either in 2018, 2020, or beyond?

14) What lessons did you learn from America’s failure to achieve and maintain political victory following the removal of governments in Iraq and Libya, and how will you apply those lessons to a potential war in Syria?

Answer These 14 Questions Before You Push For U.S. War In Syria


Obama never answered these questions before dragging the US into a war in Syria on his own. He sure as hell never answered any of them before he dragged the US into a war in Libya on his own to help Al Qaeda take over, either.




Now that we are still stuck with the mess Obama left, here are a few questions that should be answered now:

1) What national security interest, rather than pure humanitarian interest, is NOW served by the continued use of American military power to depose Assad’s regime?

2) How will deposing Assad make America safer?

3) What does final political victory in Syria look like NOW (be specific), and how long will it take for that political victory to be achieved?

4) What military resources (e.g., ground troops), diplomatic resources, and financial resources will still be required to achieve this political victory?

5) How long will it take to achieve political victory NOW?

6) What costs, in terms of lives (both military and civilian), dollars, and forgone options elsewhere as a result of resource deployment in Syria, will be required to achieve political victory? How much MORE?



FROM NOW ON, unless a President can come before the American people and answer these questions and unless a President can stand before Congress and answer these questions and make a legitimate case for the US to go to war again, the united States should NOT do so....IMHO.
 
We asked virtually the same questions in 2003 vis-a-vis Iraq.

We were told that either you're with us or against us.
Who signed the Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs?

Go ahead you fucking loser. Answer it.

Do you know wmds were found in Iraq as reported by your beloved NY Times?

You are a fucking loser.
 
We asked virtually the same questions in 2003 vis-a-vis Iraq.

We were told that either you're with us or against us.
One big difference, snowflake:

Bush went before Congress and asked for the Constitutional authority to take the country. Not only did Democrats vote to give him that authority, they gave long speeches advocating it and declaring how we had to do this.

Obama never went before Congress to ask for the authority to take the Country to war in Syria - he just did it.
 
Trump is going to continue to follow Obama's policy in Syria, cooperate with Russia in fighting ISIS which means cooperate with the forces that gas civilians.

War and Politics makes strange bedfellows.
How is Trump going to follow Obama's failed policy of regime change in Syria by working with the Russians who are protecting al-Assad and keeping him in power?
 
Wait, I thought Obama drew a red line in Syria and fixed all those problems.../sarcasm
The British Parliament said no to military actions in Syria and the Republican lead congress said no. Now Trump faces the same problem Obama faced and he will certainly do same thing Obama did because it's the only thing that makes sense. You can't fight Assad without fighting Russia and if you do you'll be fighting along side ISIS.
 
Trump is going to continue to follow Obama's policy in Syria, cooperate with Russia in fighting ISIS which means cooperate with the forces that gas civilians.

War and Politics makes strange bedfellows.
How is Trump going to follow Obama's failed policy of regime change in Syria by working with the Russians who are protecting al-Assad and keeping him in power?
What other choice does Trump have?
 
What other choice does Trump have?
Regime change is OUT, as long as Russia is protecting him.

Nikki Haley needs to continue to kick Russia's ass on the floor of the UN for starters.

She needs to demand that the Russian UN Ambassador address the UN and explain how al-Assad just used chemical weapons when Russia was responsible for ensuring the Assad Regime did not have any more. Demand that if Russia is incapable of doing that then they need to pull out of Syria, to be replaced by a U.N. Force that can and will do so. With enough public / UN pressure there is a slight chance of getting Russia out...a very slim chance.

She needs to demand that UN Inspectors / Troops be allowed to enter Syria, locate and secure not only any and all chemical weapons but all chemical weapons manufacturing locations as well.
 
What other choice does Trump have?
Regime change is OUT, as long as Russia is protecting him.

Nikki Haley needs to continue to kick Russia's ass on the floor of the UN for starters.

She needs to demand that the Russian UN Ambassador address the UN and explain how al-Assad just used chemical weapons when Russia was responsible for ensuring the Assad Regime did not have any more. Demand that if Russia is incapable of doing that then they need to pull out of Syria, to be replaced by a U.N. Force that can and will do so. With enough public / UN pressure there is a slight chance of getting Russia out...a very slim chance.

She needs to demand that UN Inspectors / Troops be allowed to enter Syria, locate and secure not only any and all chemical weapons but all chemical weapons manufacturing locations as well.

'Kremlin support for Assad not unconditional'

News from The Associated Press

"MOSCOW (AP) -- President Vladimir Putin's spokesman said Thursday that Russia's support for Syrian President Bashar Assad is not unconditional, but that the country demands a full investigation of the suspected chemical attack on a rebel-held province in Syria before the United Nations takes any action.

Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov's remarks came two days after the suspected chemical attack killed at least 72 people. Moscow, Assad's key backer, has supported the Syrian government militarily in the ongoing conflict since 2015.

Peskov told The Associated Press in an interview that "unconditional support is not possible in this current world," but added that "it is not correct to say that Moscow can convince Mr. Assad to do whatever is wanted in Moscow. This is totally wrong."


This is evidence that Russia knows that al-Assad may have just F*ed Up ROYALLY...and their comment that their support it NOT un-conditional is a big move for Russia. Assad should be nervous.

If it is proven that Assad's forces used chemical weapons - chemical weapons Russia assured the world / the U.N. they would no longer have - they now they will have a LOT to answer for!

The US needs to put the proverbial 'hammer down' right now on proving this attack was definitely perpetrated by Assad's forces then light a VERY public fire under Russia's ass!
 
We asked virtually the same questions in 2003 vis-a-vis Iraq.

We were told that either you're with us or against us.
Who signed the Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs?

Go ahead you fucking loser. Answer it.

Do you know wmds were found in Iraq as reported by your beloved NY Times?

You are a fucking loser.
Are you sure about that?
Sure about what dick?

The Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs signed by democrats?



Am I sure they were found in Iraq as reported by the NY Times?

Actually I am you piece of ignorant shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

https://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/who-was-right-about-w-m-d-s-in-iraq/

U.S. Intelligence Documents on Chemical Weapons Found in Iraq
American troops secretly reported finding more than 4,990 chemical munitions, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials and to heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. OCT. 14, 2014RELATED ARTICLEFULL COVERAGE

------------------------

I know none of these efforts by me will have any effect on you, you pathetic blob. You are a fucking loser. You are a fucking liar. You are not worth one ounce of my time. Yet I gave it to you anyway.
 
Here's a flashback to think about. Remember 1990, when Bush Sr's representative April Glaspie assured Saddam Hussein that Iraq's beef with Kuwait was none of our business?

Then after Iraq acted we suddenly made it our business? ...and made it our excuse to go to war with Iraq?

Can you connect those dots to how this Syria/Assad thing may be playing out?
 
We asked virtually the same questions in 2003 vis-a-vis Iraq.

We were told that either you're with us or against us.
Who signed the Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs?

Go ahead you fucking loser. Answer it.

Do you know wmds were found in Iraq as reported by your beloved NY Times?

You are a fucking loser.
Are you sure about that?
Sure about what dick?

The Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs signed by democrats?



Am I sure they were found in Iraq as reported by the NY Times?

Actually I am you piece of ignorant shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

https://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/who-was-right-about-w-m-d-s-in-iraq/

U.S. Intelligence Documents on Chemical Weapons Found in Iraq
American troops secretly reported finding more than 4,990 chemical munitions, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials and to heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. OCT. 14, 2014RELATED ARTICLEFULL COVERAGE

------------------------

I know none of these efforts by me will have any effect on you, you pathetic blob. You are a fucking loser. You are a fucking liar. You are not worth one ounce of my time. Yet I gave it to you anyway.
Are you sure that calling folks names and casting obscene aspersions on their character is the best way to make your feeble point? Where's the nobility in behaving so crassly?
 
What other choice does Trump have?
Regime change is OUT, as long as Russia is protecting him.

Nikki Haley needs to continue to kick Russia's ass on the floor of the UN for starters.

She needs to demand that the Russian UN Ambassador address the UN and explain how al-Assad just used chemical weapons when Russia was responsible for ensuring the Assad Regime did not have any more. Demand that if Russia is incapable of doing that then they need to pull out of Syria, to be replaced by a U.N. Force that can and will do so. With enough public / UN pressure there is a slight chance of getting Russia out...a very slim chance.

She needs to demand that UN Inspectors / Troops be allowed to enter Syria, locate and secure not only any and all chemical weapons but all chemical weapons manufacturing locations as well.
And US demands on Russia at the UN have been so effective:cuckoo:
More sanctions would have a better chance of success.
 
We asked virtually the same questions in 2003 vis-a-vis Iraq.

We were told that either you're with us or against us.
Who signed the Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs?

Go ahead you fucking loser. Answer it.

Do you know wmds were found in Iraq as reported by your beloved NY Times?

You are a fucking loser.
Are you sure about that?
Sure about what dick?

The Iraq Liberation Act for WMDs signed by democrats?



Am I sure they were found in Iraq as reported by the NY Times?

Actually I am you piece of ignorant shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html?_r=0

https://op-talk.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/17/who-was-right-about-w-m-d-s-in-iraq/

U.S. Intelligence Documents on Chemical Weapons Found in Iraq
American troops secretly reported finding more than 4,990 chemical munitions, according to interviews with dozens of participants, Iraqi and American officials and to heavily redacted intelligence documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. OCT. 14, 2014RELATED ARTICLEFULL COVERAGE

------------------------

I know none of these efforts by me will have any effect on you, you pathetic blob. You are a fucking loser. You are a fucking liar. You are not worth one ounce of my time. Yet I gave it to you anyway.
Are you sure that calling folks names and casting obscene aspersions on their character is the best way to make your feeble point? Where's the nobility in behaving so crassly?

Yeah, I knew I was right about you. Go home. You lost again. Take your fucking ball too dick. I win.

Feeble point eh?

Go fuck yourself. On ignore loser. You are not worth a pouch of warm piss, let alone my time. Have fun knowing you were wrong about everything this entire time.

Giggle away and pretend you are not bothered you pathetic fat blob.

Bye bye loser.
 

Forum List

Back
Top