Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
since when is the minimum wage "luxurious", story teller?you make up your own stories, story teller. we are discussing an amount less than the minimum wage to actually work.you need more moral fortitude that any mere false witness bearer.Employment is a the Will of Either party. Persons should work because they want to.
Because they want to work or they want the money that comes with it. You don't get money for luxuries unless you work. The decision is yours.
Even if you do not earn the money to take care of your basic needs, you need the moral fortitude to earn your own money for your own luxuries.
Yes, as I recall you want $14 an hour if the minimum wage goes to $15 an hour.
Once again, you need to earn your own money for luxuries.
The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.that is not equal protection of the law and should be challenged in every at-will employment State.There is no for-cause employment in an at-will employment state. But there is for-cause termination in an at-will state.
Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
If you understood Anything about economics, you would know why.whatever can you mean, story teller. Aesop told much better stories.lol. we really are entitled to equal protection of the law.Employment is a the Will of Either party. Persons should work because they want to.
This speaks to the root of your entitlement mentality.
People do not work because they want to work. They work because the want the results of working.
If anyone who didn't want to work was paid by the gov't, how many people would be working? A lot less.
At what point will the number of people not working no longer be sustainable by the taxes of those who do work?
And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
You know what I mean. Why do you expect the tax payers to pay for luxuries for you, why by doing so they limit the resources for others?
an employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.the Law is the Law. be legal to the Law, right wingers. fix that moral example for the rest.employment is at-will not for-cause because that would have to be in Writing in Any at-will employment State.enforce the law, right wingers. don't be illegal to State law:
n employment, having no specified term, may be terminated at the will of either party on notice to the other. Employment for a specified term means an employment for a period greater than one month.
They do enforce it. There is equal protection under the law. If you are fired for cause, you don't get any money. If you quit because your employer is break the law you can sue for back wages and even damages.
I find it amusing that you think an employee should be able to do virtually anything they want, ignore any rules, and still be compensated if they are fired for it.
No, the law states that an employer CAN, in fact, fire you for cause. You just don't like it and want the law changed. It won't happen.
since when is the minimum wage "luxurious", story teller?you make up your own stories, story teller. we are discussing an amount less than the minimum wage to actually work.you need more moral fortitude that any mere false witness bearer.Because they want to work or they want the money that comes with it. You don't get money for luxuries unless you work. The decision is yours.
Even if you do not earn the money to take care of your basic needs, you need the moral fortitude to earn your own money for your own luxuries.
Yes, as I recall you want $14 an hour if the minimum wage goes to $15 an hour.
Once again, you need to earn your own money for luxuries.
why does the right wing not have enough moral fortitude and complain about mere minimum wages for the Poor but not maximum wages for the Rich.
lol. my what stories you tell under our form of capitalism, story telling right winger.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.that is not equal protection of the law and should be challenged in every at-will employment State.
Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
Regardless of that, at some point there will be more people wanting these benefits that you want to setup than the system can afford.
If you understood Anything about economics, you would know why.whatever can you mean, story teller. Aesop told much better stories.lol. we really are entitled to equal protection of the law.This speaks to the root of your entitlement mentality.
People do not work because they want to work. They work because the want the results of working.
If anyone who didn't want to work was paid by the gov't, how many people would be working? A lot less.
At what point will the number of people not working no longer be sustainable by the taxes of those who do work?
And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
You know what I mean. Why do you expect the tax payers to pay for luxuries for you, why by doing so they limit the resources for others?
lol. my what stories you tell under our form of capitalism, story telling right winger.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
Regardless of that, at some point there will be more people wanting these benefits that you want to setup than the system can afford.
why do You believe people will flock to a minimum wage and not a maximum wage under Capitalism?
lol. with a Minimum wage instead of a Maximum wage?since when is the minimum wage "luxurious", story teller?you make up your own stories, story teller. we are discussing an amount less than the minimum wage to actually work.you need more moral fortitude that any mere false witness bearer.
Even if you do not earn the money to take care of your basic needs, you need the moral fortitude to earn your own money for your own luxuries.
Yes, as I recall you want $14 an hour if the minimum wage goes to $15 an hour.
Once again, you need to earn your own money for luxuries.
why does the right wing not have enough moral fortitude and complain about mere minimum wages for the Poor but not maximum wages for the Rich.
Since when did I say the minimum wage is luxurious? I didn't.
The state paying you for your luxuries is what I said.
you should strive to be Good and not Bad, right winger. that is the "gospel Truth" way.16 There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
lol. only story tellers who understand Nothing about economics, say that.If you understood Anything about economics, you would know why.whatever can you mean, story teller. Aesop told much better stories.lol. we really are entitled to equal protection of the law.
And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
You know what I mean. Why do you expect the tax payers to pay for luxuries for you, why by doing so they limit the resources for others?
I understand economics quite well. You, obviously, do not. You want others to work so that there will be tax money to give to you, despite having your needs already met.
lol. to a market based wage for actually working ?lol. my what stories you tell under our form of capitalism, story telling right winger.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
Regardless of that, at some point there will be more people wanting these benefits that you want to setup than the system can afford.
why do You believe people will flock to a minimum wage and not a maximum wage under Capitalism?
A minimum wage for doing nothing? Many people would find that attractive.
The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.that is not equal protection of the law and should be challenged in every at-will employment State.There is no for-cause employment in an at-will employment state. But there is for-cause termination in an at-will state.
Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
lol. only story tellers who understand Nothing about economics, say that.If you understood Anything about economics, you would know why.whatever can you mean, story teller. Aesop told much better stories.And why do you expect to be taken care of financially, including luxuries, by the state when by doing so you make it so others cannot?
You know what I mean. Why do you expect the tax payers to pay for luxuries for you, why by doing so they limit the resources for others?
I understand economics quite well. You, obviously, do not. You want others to work so that there will be tax money to give to you, despite having your needs already met.
lol. with a Minimum wage instead of a Maximum wage?since when is the minimum wage "luxurious", story teller?you make up your own stories, story teller. we are discussing an amount less than the minimum wage to actually work.Even if you do not earn the money to take care of your basic needs, you need the moral fortitude to earn your own money for your own luxuries.
Yes, as I recall you want $14 an hour if the minimum wage goes to $15 an hour.
Once again, you need to earn your own money for luxuries.
why does the right wing not have enough moral fortitude and complain about mere minimum wages for the Poor but not maximum wages for the Rich.
Since when did I say the minimum wage is luxurious? I didn't.
The state paying you for your luxuries is what I said.
you should strive to be Good and not Bad, right winger. that is the "gospel Truth" way.16 There are six things the LORD hates, seven that are detestable to him:
17 haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood,
18 a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil,
19 a false witness who pours out lies and a person who stirs up conflict in the community.
lol. that is Your story not my story.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.that is not equal protection of the law and should be challenged in every at-will employment State.
Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
"The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal."???? That is bullshit. YOur goal is to be able to spend money on luxuries without having to get a job.
lol. that is Your story not my story.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.Yes, it is equal protection under the law. And since you can be terminated for any or no reason, being terminated for cause is the same result.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
"The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal."???? That is bullshit. YOur goal is to be able to spend money on luxuries without having to get a job.
Yes, it is. The right wing and You, are much bigger liars than me. I really do have the lowest numbers and least amount of practice, and that makes me the most moral if not the most holy.lol. that is Your story not my story.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.so is being able to quit for no reason or any reason and collect unemployment compensation.
Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
"The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal."???? That is bullshit. YOur goal is to be able to spend money on luxuries without having to get a job.
According to what you have posted on USMB, it is your story. Of course, you lying on here is not unheard of.
Yes, it is. The right wing and You, are much bigger liars than me. I really do have the lowest numbers and least amount of practice, and that makes me the most moral if not the most holy.lol. that is Your story not my story.The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal. I am advocating for a general tax that everyone with an income could contribute to. It could be collected at point of sale.Only if the state were to pay for the employer's loss of a laborer.
"The way and means for an more equitable of ensuring capital circulates is the goal."???? That is bullshit. YOur goal is to be able to spend money on luxuries without having to get a job.
According to what you have posted on USMB, it is your story. Of course, you lying on here is not unheard of.
You tell nothing but stories, story teller.
We should bear true witness to our own laws.
